Literature DB >> 30792136

Impact of "psychosis risk" identification: Examining predictors of how youth view themselves.

Lawrence H Yang1, Kristen A Woodberry2, Bruce G Link3, Cheryl M Corcoran4, Caitlin Bryant5, Daniel I Shapiro6, Donna Downing7, Ragy R Girgis8, Gary Brucato8, Debbie Huang9, Francesca M Crump10, Mary Verdi7, William R McFarlane11, Larry J Seidman6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Identifying young people as at clinical high-risk (CHR) for psychosis affords opportunities for intervention to possibly prevent psychosis onset. Yet such CHR identification could plausibly increase stigma. We do not know whether these youth already perceive themselves to be at psychosis-risk (PR) or how their being told they are at PR might impact how they think about themselves.
METHODS: 148 CHR youth were asked about labels they had been given by others (labeling by others) or with which they personally identified (self-labeling). They were then asked which had the greatest impact on how they thought about themselves. We evaluated whether being told vs. thinking they were at PR had stronger effects.
FINDINGS: The majority identified nonpsychotic disorders rather than PR labels as having the greatest impact on sense of self (67.6% vs. 27.7%). However, participants who identified themselves as at PR had an 8.8 (95% CI = 2.0-39.1) increase in the odds of the PR label having the greatest impact (p < 0.01). Additionally, having been told by others that they were at PR was associated with a 4.0 increase in odds (95% CI = 1.1-15.0) that the PR label had the most impact (p < 0.05).
INTERPRETATION: Nonpsychotic disorder labels appear to have a greater impact on CHR youth than psychosis-risk labels. However, thinking they are at PR, and, secondarily, being told they are at PR, appears to increase the relative impact of the PR label. Understanding self- and other-labeling may be important to how young people think of themselves, and may inform early intervention strategies.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical high risk state for psychosis; Early intervention; Identity; Psychosis risk; Stigma

Year:  2019        PMID: 30792136      PMCID: PMC7079577          DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.01.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schizophr Res        ISSN: 0920-9964            Impact factor:   4.939


  31 in total

1.  Prodromal assessment with the structured interview for prodromal syndromes and the scale of prodromal symptoms: predictive validity, interrater reliability, and training to reliability.

Authors:  Tandy J Miller; Thomas H McGlashan; Joanna L Rosen; Kristen Cadenhead; Tyrone Cannon; Joseph Ventura; William McFarlane; Diana O Perkins; Godfrey D Pearlson; Scott W Woods
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.306

2.  Potential stigma associated with inclusion of the psychosis risk syndrome in the DSM-V: an empirical question.

Authors:  Lawrence H Yang; Ahtoy J Wonpat-Borja; Mark G Opler; Cheryl M Corcoran
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Stigma as a stressor and transition to schizophrenia after one year among young people at risk of psychosis.

Authors:  Nicolas Rüsch; Karsten Heekeren; Anastasia Theodoridou; Mario Müller; Patrick W Corrigan; Benjamin Mayer; Sibylle Metzler; Diane Dvorsky; Susanne Walitza; Wulf Rössler
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2015-05-31       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Is living with psychosis demoralizing? Insight, self-stigma, and clinical outcome among people with schizophrenia across 1 year.

Authors:  Marialuisa Cavelti; Nicolas Rüsch; Roland Vauth
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.254

5.  Treatment Precedes Positive Symptoms in North American Adolescent and Young Adult Clinical High Risk Cohort.

Authors:  Kristen A Woodberry; Larry J Seidman; Caitlin Bryant; Jean Addington; Carrie E Bearden; Kristin S Cadenhead; Tyrone D Cannon; Barbara A Cornblatt; Thomas H McGlashan; Daniel H Mathalon; Diana O Perkins; Ming T Tsuang; Elaine F Walker; Scott W Woods
Journal:  J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol       Date:  2016-10-05

Review 6.  The psychosis high-risk state: a comprehensive state-of-the-art review.

Authors:  Paolo Fusar-Poli; Stefan Borgwardt; Andreas Bechdolf; Jean Addington; Anita Riecher-Rössler; Frauke Schultze-Lutter; Matcheri Keshavan; Stephen Wood; Stephan Ruhrmann; Larry J Seidman; Lucia Valmaggia; Tyrone Cannon; Eva Velthorst; Lieuwe De Haan; Barbara Cornblatt; Ilaria Bonoldi; Max Birchwood; Thomas McGlashan; William Carpenter; Patrick McGorry; Joachim Klosterkötter; Philip McGuire; Alison Yung
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 21.596

7.  Examining a progressive model of self-stigma and its impact on people with serious mental illness.

Authors:  Patrick W Corrigan; Jennifer Rafacz; Nicolas Rüsch
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.222

8.  Are current labeling terms suitable for people who are at risk of psychosis?

Authors:  Sung-Wan Kim; Andrea Polari; Fritha Melville; Bridget Moller; Jae-Min Kim; Paul Amminger; Helen Herrman; Patrick McGorry; Barnaby Nelson
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Self-labeling and its effects among adolescents diagnosed with mental disorders.

Authors:  Tally Moses
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Preliminary findings for two new measures of social and role functioning in the prodromal phase of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Barbara A Cornblatt; Andrea M Auther; Tara Niendam; Christopher W Smith; Jamie Zinberg; Carrie E Bearden; Tyrone D Cannon
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2007-04-17       Impact factor: 9.306

View more
  6 in total

1.  Reducing Stigma Among Youth at Risk for Psychosis: A Call to Action.

Authors:  Joseph S DeLuca; Lawrence H Yang; Alicia A Lucksted; Philip T Yanos; Jordan DeVylder; Deidre M Anglin; Yulia Landa; Cheryl M Corcoran
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 7.348

2.  Emotional and stigma-related experiences relative to being told one is at risk for psychosis.

Authors:  Kristen A Woodberry; Kate S Powers; Caitlin Bryant; Donna Downing; Mary B Verdi; Katherine M Elacqua; Audrey R L Reuman; Leda Kennedy; Daniel I Shapiro; Michelle L West; Debbie Huang; Francesca M Crump; Margaux M Grivel; Drew Blasco; Shaynna N Herrera; Cheryl M Corcoran; Larry J Seidman; Bruce G Link; William R McFarlane; Lawrence H Yang
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 4.662

Review 3.  Real-World Implementation of Precision Psychiatry: A Systematic Review of Barriers and Facilitators.

Authors:  Helen Baldwin; Lion Loebel-Davidsohn; Dominic Oliver; Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo; Daniel Stahl; Heleen Riper; Paolo Fusar-Poli
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-07-16

4.  A qualitative study on identity in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis: " … Why does it have to be one thing?".

Authors:  Cansu Sarac; Joseph S DeLuca; Zarina R Bilgrami; Shaynna N Herrera; Jonathan J Myers; Matthew F Dobbs; Shalaila S Haas; Therese L Todd; Agrima Srivastava; Rachel Jespersen; Riaz B Shaik; Yulia Landa; Larry Davidson; Anthony J Pavlo; Cheryl M Corcoran
Journal:  Psychiatr Rehabil J       Date:  2021-06-17

5.  Preliminary support for using the Atypicality Scale from the Behavior Assessment System for Children, Second Edition, to screen for psychosis-spectrum disorders within a college counselling centre.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Thompson; Joseph S DeLuca; Emily Petti; Pamela Rakhshan Rouhakhtar; Jason Schiffman
Journal:  Early Interv Psychiatry       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 2.732

Review 6.  Advances in clinical staging, early intervention, and the prevention of psychosis.

Authors:  Tina Gupta; Vijay A Mittal
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-11-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.