| Literature DB >> 32435933 |
Jaromir Richter1,2, Peter Sklienka3, Adarsh Eshappa Setra4, Roman Zahorec5, Samaresh Das4, Nilay Chatterjee4.
Abstract
Cerebral protection against secondary hypoxic-ischemic brain injury is a key priority area in post-resuscitation intensive care management in survivors of cardiac arrest. Nevertheless, the current understanding of the incidence, diagnosis and its' impact on neurological outcome remains undetermined. The aim of this study was to evaluate jugular bulb oximetry as a potential monitoring modality to detect the incidences of desaturation episodes during post-cardiac arrest intensive care management and to evaluate their subsequent impact on neurological outcome. We conducted a prospective, observational study in unconscious adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit who had successful resuscitation following out of hospital cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac causes. All the patients were treated as per European Resuscitation Council 2015 guidelines and they received jugular bulb catheter. Jugular bulb oximetry measurements were performed at six hourly intervals. The neurological outcomes were evaluated on 90th day after the cardiac arrest by cerebral performance categories scale. Forty patients met the eligibility criteria. Measurements of jugular venous oxygen saturation were performed for 438 times. Altogether, we found 2 incidences of jugular bulb oxygen saturation less than 50% (2/438; 0.46%), and 4 incidences when it was less than 55% (4/438; 0.91%). The study detected an association between SjVO2 and CO2 (r = 0.26), each 1 kPa increase in CO2 led to an increase in SjvO2 by 3.4% + / - 0.67 (p < 0.0001). There was no association between SjvO2 and PaO2 or SjvO2 and MAP. We observed a statistically significant higher mean SjvO2 (8.82% + / - 2.05, p < 0.0001) in unfavorable outcome group. The episodes of brain hypoxia detected by jugular bulb oxygen saturation were rare during post-resuscitation intensive care management in out of hospital cardiac arrest patients. Therefore, this modality of monitoring may not yield any additional information towards prevention of secondary hypoxic ischemic brain injury in post cardiac arrest survivors. Other factors contributing towards high jugular venous saturation needs to be considered.Entities:
Keywords: Brain hypoxia; Cerebral edema; Jugular bulb oxygen saturation; Monitoring; Out of hospital cardiac arrest
Year: 2020 PMID: 32435933 PMCID: PMC8286927 DOI: 10.1007/s10877-020-00530-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Monit Comput ISSN: 1387-1307 Impact factor: 2.502
Study variables
| Variables | Favorable outcome | Unfavorable outcome | Total | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of patients | 17 | 23 | 40 | |
| Gender (% of male) | 15/17 (88) | 21/23 (91) | 36/40 (90) | NS |
| Age (years) (mean + / − SD) | 55.47 + / − 10.84 | 61.39 + / − 9.66 | 58.88 + / − 10.47 | NS |
| Time of arrest to ROSC (min) (mean + / − IQR) | 14/17 (8–25) | 21/23 (18–33) | 20.5 (14–29.3) | 0.012 |
| Initial rhythm | ||||
| Asystole/PEA (%) | 0/17 (0) | 7/23 (30) | 7/40 (18) | 0.014 |
| Shockable rhythm (%) | 17/17 (100) | 16/23 (70) | 33/40 (82) | 0.014 |
| APACHE II (mean + / − IQR) | 25 (23.5–27) | 29 (26.5–33) | 28 (25–30) | 0.014 |
| Initial tests | ||||
| Hemoglobin (g/dl) (mean + / − SD) | 14.4 + / − 1.7 | 14.1 + / − 1.6 | 14.2 + / − 1.6 | NS |
| pH (mean + / − SD) | 7.27 (7.25–7.33) | 7.27 (7.11–7.37) | 7.27 (7.18–7.36) | NS |
| Lactate (mmol/l) (mean + / − IQR) | 1.9 (1.3–3.9) | 2.2 (1.65–6.15) | 2.1 (1.3–5.72) | NS |
| Underwent coronary angiography (%) | 16/17 (94) | 22/23 (96) | 38/40 (95) | NS |
| Underwent PCI + coronary angiography (%) | 10/17 (59) | 13/23 (57) | 23/40 (58) | NS |
SD standard deviation, IQR 25–75% inter quartile range
SjvO2 levels at different time intervals and outcomes
| SjvO2 values | Favorable outcome (mean + / | Unfavorable outcome (mean + / | p |
|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | 75 (68–79) | 75 (63.5–78.5) | NS |
| T6 | 77 (72–80) | 79 (69.5–82) | NS |
| T12 | 75 (72–83) | 81 (77–86) | NS |
| T18 | 74.5 (68.5–78.25) | 83 (79–87.5) | 0.0003 |
| T24 | 76 (71–80) | 84 (78–87.5) | 0.004 |
| T30 | 78 (71–81) | 83 (77–85.5) | 0.01 |
| T36 | 75 (62.5–79) | 82 (76–86.5) | 0.007 |
| T42 | 71 (64.25–78.75) | 81 (78.25–84.75) | 0.0006 |
| T48 | 77 (66–78) | 82.5 (80–85) | 0.002 |
| T54 | 70 (68–77) | 82 (81–86) | < 0.0001 |
| T60 | 72 (67.5–76) | 83 (79.25–86.5) | 0.003 |
| T66 | 71 (67.25–74.25) | 81.5 (79.25–85.75) | 0.0004 |
Incidence of SjvO2 < 50% and < 55% and relation with outcomes
| SjvO2 | Favorable outcome (n = 17) | Unfavorable outcome (n = 23) | Overall (n = 40) |
|---|---|---|---|
| SjvO2 (no of measurements) | 170 (39%) | 268 (61%) | 438 (100%) |
| SjvO2 < 50% (number of episodes) | 1 | 1 | 2 (0.46%) |
| SjvO2 < 55% (number of episodes) | 3 | 1 | 4 (0.91%) |
Fig. 1SjvO2 levels at different time intervals in favorable and unfavorable groups
Fig. 2MAP levels at different time intervals in favorable and unfavorable groups
Fig. 3Correlation between SjvO2 and PaCO2