Literature DB >> 32435664

Allopregnanolone in premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD): Evidence for dysregulated sensitivity to GABA-A receptor modulating neuroactive steroids across the menstrual cycle.

Liisa Hantsoo1, C Neill Epperson2.   

Abstract

Premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) is a severe mood disorder with core symptoms (affective lability, irritability, depressed mood, anxiety) and increased sensitivity to stress occurring in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. PMDD can be conceptualized as a disorder of suboptimal sensitivity to neuroactive steroid hormones (NASs). In this review, we describe the role of the NAS allopregnanolone (ALLO), a positive allosteric modulator of the GABAA receptor (GABAA-R), in PMDD's pathophysiology. We review evidence of impaired interaction between ALLO and GABAA-Rs in terms of affective symptom expression, with evidence from rodent and human studies. We discuss evidence of increased luteal phase stress sensitivity as a result of poor ALLO-GABA control of the HPA axis. Finally, we describe how treatments such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and new drugs targeting GABAA-Rs provide evidence for impaired ALLO-GABA function in PMDD. In sum, the literature supports the hypothesis that PMDD pathophysiology is rooted in impaired GABAA-R response to dynamic ALLO fluctuations across the menstrual cycle, manifesting in affective symptoms and poor regulation of physiologic stress response.
© 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allopregnanolone; Menstrual cycle; Premenstrual dysphoric disorder; Premenstrual syndrome; Progesterone; Women's health

Year:  2020        PMID: 32435664      PMCID: PMC7231988          DOI: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2020.100213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurobiol Stress        ISSN: 2352-2895


Introduction

PMDD is a unique cyclic mood disorder. Premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) is a severe mood disorder, unique in that symptoms emerge and remit with the hormonal fluctuations of the menstrual cycle. Symptoms emerge monthly in the luteal phase, roughly one to two weeks before menses, when sex steroid hormones are fluctuating. Symptoms quickly remit in the hormonally stable follicular phase of the menstrual cycle, the roughly two weeks between menses and ovulation. Symptoms then return with the following menstrual cycle's luteal phase. Characteristic PMDD symptoms include affective lability, irritability, depressed mood, anxiety, as well as decreased interest in usual activities, poor concentration, fatigability, change in appetite, sleep changes, sense of overwhelm, and physical symptoms such as breast tenderness, bloating or headaches (Epperson et al., 2012). The monthly waxing and waning of these symptoms produces distress and functional impairment totaling 24 days to up to 6 months annually (Hantsoo and Epperson, 2015). Across the roughly 450 menstrual cycles that a woman has in her lifetime (Halbreich et al., 2003), a woman who experiences PMDD symptoms for one week per cycle would experience 8.6 cumulative years of symptoms, similar to what someone with recurrent major depressive disorder would experience across their lifetime (Kessler and Walters, 1998). PMDD affects three to eight percent of women worldwide (Halbreich et al., 2003), roughly similar to the prevalence of generalized anxiety disorder or panic disorder (Altemus et al., 2014; Kessler et al., 2005; McLean et al., 2011). PMDD is a disorder of suboptimal sensitivity to sex steroids. Reflected in symptom emergence during a hormonally dynamic phase of the menstrual cycle, PMDD's pathophysiology likely involves altered central nervous system (CNS) sensitivity to neuroactive steroid (NAS) hormones. NASs are steroid hormones produced in endocrine tissue or brain that interact with neuron receptors, such as the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-A receptor (GABAA-R) or NMDA receptors. Examples of NASs are pregnenolone, progesterone, estradiol, and corticosterone. This review will focus on the NAS allopregnanolone (ALLO), a progesterone metabolite. ALLO acts as an allosteric modulator of the GABAA-R to potentiate the effect of GABA, the main inhibitory neurotransmitter in the CNS. In this review, we describe the role of ALLO in PMDD's pathophysiology. Stress response is altered in PMDD. Along with the core mood symptoms of the luteal phase, women with PMDD experience increased sensitivity to stress during the luteal phase. This includes not only increased greater subjective perceived stress (Beddig et al., 2019; Petersen et al., 2016), but altered physiologic stress responsivity such as hypothalamic pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis function (Beddig et al., 2019; Girdler et al., 1998; Parry et al., 2000) and acoustic startle response (ASR) (Epperson et al., 2007; Hantsoo et al., 2015). In this review, we describe alterations in stress response among women with PMDD, particularly as related to interactions between the HPA and hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axes.

Suboptimal sensitivity to allopregnanolone in PMDD

While there are multiple potential contributors to PMDD's etiology including genetic factors (Dubey et al., 2017) and psychosocial factors (Pilver et al., 2011), this review focuses on impaired CNS sensitivity to NASs. The timing of symptom onset and offset in PMDD implicates hormonal fluctuation as a critical component of PMDD's etiology. Paradoxically, women with PMDD cannot be distinguished from asymptomatic women in terms of peripheral ovarian hormone levels (Thys-Jacobs et al., 2008), including ALLO (Nguyen et al., 2017). Instead, it is hypothesized that women with PMDD have altered sensitivity at the receptor level to normal hormonal fluctuations across the menstrual cycle (Bäckström et al., 2011; MacKenzie and Maguire, 2014). The hormone sensitivity hypothesis proposes that PMDD represents an aberrant response to sex steroid hormones (Dubey et al., 2017; Schmidt et al., 1998). Growing evidence suggests that the hallmark symptoms of PMDD - mood lability, anxiety and irritability, often exacerbated by stress - reflect suboptimal GABAA-R sensitivity to ALLO.

Progesterone's metabolite, allopregnanolone

Progesterone, a sex steroid secreted by the corpus luteum responsible for preparing the uterus for implantation, is low during the follicular phase, rises across the luteal phase, and drops rapidly in the late luteal phase just prior to menses. Its levels are mirrored by its metabolite, ALLO (Timby, 2012). ALLO is a potent positive allosteric modulator of the GABAA-R; when it binds to its site on the receptor, it potentiates function by increasing Cl− ion flux when GABA binds GABAA-R (Chen et al., 2019; Lambert et al., 2009). ALLO thus has anxiolytic, anesthetic and sedative properties similar to barbiturates or benzodiazepines (Schüle et al., 2014).

ALLO synthesis from progesterone

ALLO is synthesized from progesterone in two steps: first, 5α-reductase converts progesterone to 5α-dihydroprogesterone (5α-DHP), then 3α hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3α-HSD) converts 5α-DHP to allopregnanolone (Agís-Balboa et al., 2006). Women with PMDD exhibited higher 5α-DHP in the mid-luteal phase than control women (Epperson et al., 2002), but there is no direct evidence to date that women with PMDD have alterations in the enzymatic pathway from progesterone to ALLO. Women with PMDD showed no differences in metabolic processing of exogenously administered estradiol or progesterone after ovarian suppression compared with controls (Nguyen et al., 2017). Further work in larger samples is needed to assess the function of these biosynthetic enzymes in PMDD.

ALLO levels and kinetics

While basal NAS levels do not differ between women with PMDD and controls at particular phases of the menstrual cycle (Nguyen et al., 2017; Thys-Jacobs et al., 2008), it is possible that there are differences in the dynamics of these hormones across the menstrual cycle in women with PMDD. ALLO exposure followed by rapid withdrawal may be a key factor in the etiology of PMDD (Smith et al., 2006). In an animal model of PMDD based on progesterone withdrawal, rats that rapidly withdrew from physiological doses of progesterone exhibited social withdrawal and anhedonia, symptoms characteristic of PMDD (Li et al., 2012). Indeed, when rate of decline of progesterone was manipulated in rodents, a rapid decline in plasma progesterone increased anxiety-like behavior, while a gradual progesterone decline did not (Doornbos et al., 2009). Similar patterns are emerging from human studies. Dutasteride, a 5-alpha reductase inhibitor, prevented symptom onset in women with PMDD in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study (Martinez et al., 2016). While the participants experienced luteal phase progesterone fluctuations, by blocking 5-alpha reductase's conversion of progesterone to ALLO, the researchers stabilized ALLO levels and reduced symptoms of irritability, low mood, anxiety, food cravings and bloating. This emphasizes that it is likely not the absolute level of ALLO, but changes in its levels across the luteal phase, that triggers PMDD symptoms. Indeed, a study that examined kinetics of progesterone levels across the luteal phase found differences in rates of change in progesterone between women with PMDD and asymptomatic controls (Lovick et al., 2017). In controls, progesterone levels gradually waned in the eight days prior to menses. In the women with premenstrual symptoms, progesterone levels remained stable until three days prior to menses, when they dropped sharply. This is similar to the rodent study in which an abrupt decline in progesterone produced anxiety symptoms while a gradual decline did not (Doornbos et al., 2009), although did not address why PMDD symptoms may also occur when ALLO levels are increasing (Martinez et al., 2016).

Animal models of PMDD are based on NAS withdrawal

Animal models of PMDD are based on withdrawal from progesterone or ALLO (Li et al., 2012; Smith et al., 2006). As described above, fluctuation in ALLO is thought to be a key trigger of PMDD symptoms (Martinez et al., 2016). In rodents, rapid withdrawal from progesterone or ALLO produces symptoms characteristic of PMDD, such as increased anxiety behavior (increased ASR, decreased open arm entries in elevated plus maze) (Gulinello and Smith, 2003; Smith et al., 2006) and depressive behavior (increased immobility in forced swim test, social withdrawal in social preference test, anhedonia in saccharin preference test) (Li et al., 2012). In these rodent models of PMDD, NAS withdrawal also alters GABAA-R structure, detailed in the next section. Briefly, in female rats, progesterone exposure and withdrawal upregulated the α4 subunit of GABAA-R (Smith et al., 1998b). Similarly, in a mouse model of PMDD, withdrawal from ALLO increased expression of the GABAA-R α4 subunit eight-fold, accompanied by anxiety-like behaviors (Smith et al., 2006). Female rats withdrawn from chronic progesterone similarly exhibited upregulation of GABAA-R α4 subunit expression, which was paralleled by elevated ASR (Gulinello et al., 2003). Importantly, progesterone withdrawal did not alter serotonin levels in rat cortex or hippocampus, indicating that PMDD symptoms may not be serotonin-driven (Li et al., 2012). These results from animal models also suggest that expression of the GABAA-R subunits, such as α4, may be a key piece of PMDD pathophysiology.

Altered interaction between ALLO and GABAA receptors in PMDD

GABAA-R subunits

GABAA-Rs are composed of five subunits of nineteen (α1–α6, β1–β3, γ1–γ3, δ, ε, θ, π, ρ1–ρ3) (Chua and Chebib, 2017; Simon et al., 2004). GABAA-R subunit expression is dynamic, and varies by sex and hormonal status (Bhandage et al., 2015; Maguire and Mody, 2008; Sanna et al., 2009). Different subunit combinations produce different sensitivity to pharmacologic compounds and NASs, i.e. structure informs function (Knoflach et al., 2018). While an exhaustive review of the GABAA-R subunits is beyond the scope of this article (instead, see Belelli et al., 2006; Wang, 2011; Lee and Maguire, 2014), we describe several subunits potentially relevant to PMDD. The α subunits of GABAA-Rs are sensitive to NASs, enhancing GABAergic current. α1-and α3-containing GABAA-Rs are sensitive to low concentrations of ALLO, while α2-, α4-, α5-and α6-containing receptors are sensitive to higher ALLO concentrations (Belelli et al., 2002). The expression of the subunits themselves is also responsive to fluctuations in NASs. Administration of pregnanolone, an isomer of ALLO, increased α4 subunit expression in female rats over a 48-h period (Shen et al., 2005). Administration of progesterone over 21 days (mimicking the human menstrual cycle) followed by rapid withdrawal increased GABAA-R α4 subunit expression by 2–3 fold in female rats within 24 h of withdrawal and increased anxiety, reflected in elevated ASR, in the rodent model of PMDD mentioned above (Gulinello et al., 2003). In another PMDD rodent model, withdrawal from ALLO via finasteride, a 5α-reductase inhibitor, increased expression of the GABAA-R α4 subunit eight-fold, accompanied by anxiety-like behaviors (Smith et al., 2006). Other studies have also shown that increases in the α4 subunit are associated with increased anxiety behavior (Gulinello et al., 2001; Smith et al., 1998b). δ-Containing GABAA-Rs are also sensitive to NASs, particularly at low concentrations (Belelli et al., 2002). The δ subunit is involved in tonic inhibition, in which GABA “spillover” in the extracellular space produces a persistent activation of GABAA-Rs, in contrast to the brief phasic inhibition resulting from presynaptic release of GABA (Farrant and Nusser, 2005). As mentioned above, administration of pregnanolone over 48 h influenced GABAA-R subunit expression, increasing not only α4 subunits but increasing δ subunit expression four-to five-fold in female rats (Shen et al., 2005). Further, ALLO withdrawal produced anxiety behavior except in δ knockout mice (Smith et al., 2006). The δ subunits are thought to be involved in regulating anxiety-like behavior (Maguire et al., 2005). Plasticity of GABAA-Rs or their subunits in response to NAS fluctuations may be a key aspect of PMDD pathophysiology (MacKenzie and Maguire, 2014). However, findings at this point are limited to animal research. Animal data on other reproductive affective disorders (e.g. postpartum depression) suggest that mice that were not able to regulate GABAA-R dynamics in response to the slow rise and rapid decrease in ALLO across pregnancy and postpartum showed depression-like behaviors postpartum (Maguire and Mody, 2008). In control mice, the rapid postpartum drop of NASs to pre-pregnancy levels was followed by an appropriate corresponding adjustment in number of functional GABAA-Rs (Maguire and Mody, 2008). Together, rodent models suggest impaired GABAA-R plasticity in response to NAS fluctuations in reproductive affective disorders such as postpartum depression and PMDD (Gallo and Smith, 1993; Gulinello et al., 2001; Reddy et al., 2012; Smith et al., 1998a; Sundstrom-Poromaa et al., 2002).

Evidence of altered interaction between ALLO and GABAA-Rs in clinical studies

Although data is sparse relative to animal studies, women with PMDD show evidence of altered GABAA-R response to ALLO. While intravenous administration of ALLO to healthy controls increased sedation and decreased maximal saccadic eye velocity (SEV; regulated by the GABAA-R (Ball et al., 1991)), women with PMDD did not experience ALLO-induced sedation in the luteal phase and paradoxically experienced sedation in the follicular phase (Timby et al., 2016). As SEV is a measure of GABAA-R sensitivity (Bixo et al., 2018), these findings suggest that women with PMDD have altered GABAA-R function that changes across the menstrual cycle. Preliminary data from our laboratory also indicates that women with PMDD have elevated anxiety-potentiated startle (APS) in the luteal phase relative to controls in the luteal phase, suggestive of altered GABAA-R function in the context of fluctuating ALLO levels (Hantsoo et al., 2015). Together, the findings in rodents and humans support the hypothesis that PMDD reflects a failure of GABAA-R plasticity; the GABAA-R in PMDD is unable to adapt its composition to changing ALLO levels across the menstrual cycle, resulting in affective symptoms and poor regulation of stress response.

Allopregnanolone and stress response in PMDD

The hypothalamic pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis

ALLO's sedative effects make it a critical aspect of acute stress response; it not only exerts calming effects, but regulates HPA axis response to acute stress (Cullinan et al., 2008). In the laboratory, a bolus injection of ALLO produces a subjective sense of sedation in healthy individuals (Kask et al., 2009). Accordingly, acute stress triggers an ALLO increase (Childs et al., 2010; Purdy et al., 1991), reflected both centrally in brain tissue and peripherally in blood (Klatzkin et al., 2006), peaking twenty to 60 min after stressor onset (Eser et al., 2005; Purdy et al., 1991). ALLO's role in acute stress response is to potentiate GABAergic transmission, promoting anxiolysis and attenuating stress response. ALLO attenuates corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) release from the hypothalamus, promoting negative feedback in the HPA axis to ultimately reduce adrenal gland cortisol secretion and restore homeostasis (Patchev et al., 1994; Turkmen et al., 2011). Women with PMDD show altered HPA axis function, including lower cortisol levels during mental stress (Girdler et al., 2001; Huang et al., 2015) and higher baseline cortisol levels during the luteal phase (Rasgon et al., 2000) compared to controls. However, findings are mixed, with some reports of typical HPA function in women with PMDD (Lee et al., 2012), or altered HPA indicators only in a subset of PMDD women (Segebladh et al., 2013). For instance, only women with both PMDD and high serum ALLO levels exhibited blunted nocturnal cortisol levels (Segebladh et al., 2013). Women with premenstrual mood symptoms also show alterations in ALLO response to acute stress. ALLO release to HPA axis stimulation was blunted in women with premenstrual syndrome (PMS), a less severe syndrome than PMDD with fewer, milder symptoms (Lombardi et al., 2004). In that study, controls and women with PMS underwent dexamethasone suppression of the HPA axis followed by ACTH stimulation. Women with PMS had a smaller, delayed ALLO response to ACTH stimulation than controls, particularly in the luteal phase. This suggests that women with premenstrual mood syndromes may have dysregulated interaction between the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal (HPG) and HPA axes. If GABAA-Rs fail to respond appropriately to fluctuating ALLO across the menstrual cycle in PMDD, it follows that these GABAA-Rs may exert poor control over the HPA axis in PMDD (Gordon et al., 2015). This poor GABA regulation of the HPA axis may be reflected in the increased stress sensitivity of women with PMDD in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle.

Acoustic startle response

Acoustic startle in animal models of PMDD

The startle reflex is an index of physiological arousal, and can be considered an aspect of stress response. As ASR is conserved across species, it is a highly translational tool and has been used in animal models of PMDD. As described above, progesterone or ALLO withdrawal are often used to model PMDD in rodents. In a rodent model of PMDD, progesterone withdrawal increased ASR and upregulated GABAA-R α4 subunit expression (Gulinello et al., 2003). In this rodent model, the authors proposed that elevated ASR represented greater anxiety levels.

Acoustic startle in women with PMDD

Physiological arousal may be altered at points in the menstrual cycle among women with PMDD. During the follicular phase when ALLO levels are low, ASR was similar between healthy controls and women with PMDD, but in the luteal phase, PMDD women showed increased ASR (Epperson et al., 2007). In another study, women with PMDD had greater ASR in both phases of the menstrual cycle compared to controls, with ASR particularly accentuated in the luteal phase (Kask et al., 2008). Women with PMDD also had enhanced ASR in anticipation of positive and negative images, compared with controls, during the luteal phase (Bannbers et al., 2011). Together, these ASR findings in women with PMDD show elevated physiologic arousal in the luteal phase, suggesting that ALLO action on GABAARs is failing to moderate arousal.

Anxiety-potentiated and fear-potentiated startle

Anxiety potentiated startle (APS) is the potentiation of ASR during sustained anxious anticipation of a potential threat (Davis et al., 2010). APS is mediated by the GABAAR-rich bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) (Davis, 2006; Davis et al., 2010; Lee and Davis, 1997; Sink et al., 2012). Fear-potentiated startle (FPS) is the phasic potentiation of ASR by an explicit and predictable threat, mediated by the amygdala (Alvarez et al., 2011). Intriguingly, in rodents ALLO dampens APS (operationalized as corticotrophin releasing factor (CRF)-enhanced startle) but not FPS (Toufexis et al., 2004). Ovariectomized rats injected with estradiol and progesterone showed a blunted CRF-enhanced startle compared with estradiol-only injected rats, an effect of progesterone mediated by ALLO (Toufexis et al., 2004). However, neither chronic progesterone nor acute ALLO affected FPS, indicating that ALLO's influence is specific to anticipatory anxiety as opposed to fear. APS may therefore serve as a marker of GABAA-R sensitivity, as it is mediated by the ALLO-sensitive and GABA-R-rich BNST (Schmitz and Grillon, 2012). APS's sensitivity to ALLO makes it a potential marker for altered sensitivity to NASs in women with PMDD (Hantsoo et al., 2018). APS may broadly reflect altered stress sensitivity in PMDD, as the BNST coordinates HPA and HPG axes (Oyola and Handa, 2017). Indeed, women with PMDD often report that they are more reactive to stressors during the symptomatic luteal phase, feeling unable to dampen their response to external stimuli (Hantsoo and Epperson, 2015; Petersen et al., 2016).

Lifetime stress exposure

History of significant lifetime stress exposure is associated with PMDD. These include adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) such as chronic household dysfunction, and trauma such as abuse. Higher rates of stressful life events and childhood abuse have been reported among women with PMDD compared with women without PMDD (Bunevicius et al., 2005; Golding et al., 2000; Perkonigg et al., 2004; Wittchen et al., 2003). In a sample of nearly 4000 women, trauma history was associated with PMDD diagnosis (Pilver et al., 2011). Past emotional and physical abuse were strongly correlated with moderate to severe PMS in a longitudinal case-control study of over 3000 women (Bertone-Johnson et al., 2014a). The Nurses' Health Study cohort found a greater risk for moderate to severe PMS in women with histories of childhood emotional, physical or sexual abuse (Bertone-Johnson et al., 2014b). Research by Epperson and colleagues suggests that adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) may prime women for risk of mood disorders at points of hormonal fluctuation. For instance, women who had experienced multiple ACEs prior to puberty had a 2.3 times greater risk of incident major depression at the menopausal transition, compared with women with no ACE history (Epperson et al., 2017). Similarly, women who experienced multiple ACEs had dysregulated HPA axis function perinatally (Morrison et al., 2017). In line with Epperson's work, a similar pattern may hold for PMDD. That is, history of ACEs or trauma exposure may make some women more vulnerable to the effects of hormonal fluctuations across the menstrual cycle. One potential mechanism linking stress exposure history and PMDD is ALLO. While ALLO increases with acute stress (Crowley and Girdler, 2014; Klatzkin et al., 2006), after repeated or chronic stress, serum ALLO levels become blunted in rodents (Serra et al., 2007). Given the possible impact of childhood adversity on physiologic arousal regulation (Jovanovic et al., 2009), it is possible that the organizational effect of adversity early in life contributes to dysregulation of the HPA-HPG axes and their modulation by ovarian steroids.

Treatment

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs)

SSRIs are the gold standard treatment for PMDD (Lovick, 2013). However, they exhibit unique properties when used for PMDD treatment, namely a rapid therapeutic effect and efficacy at low doses. In women with PMDD, SSRIs typically reduce symptoms over the course of one to three days, in contrast to the weeks often required for response to SSRIs in major depression (Landén and Thase, 2006; Steinberg et al., 2012). Using hourly mood ratings, nearly two-thirds of women with PMDD experienced a 50% reduction in symptoms relative to baseline within 2 days of luteal phase fluoxetine treatment (Steinberg et al., 2012). Similarly in placebo-controlled trials, luteal phase administration of sertraline (Yonkers et al., 2015) and paroxetine (Steiner et al., 2008) were more effective than placebo in reducing PMDD symptoms. SSRIs are also effective at low doses in PMDD, for instance, 25–50 mg sertraline (Kornstein et al., 2006) or 20 mg fluoxetine (Steinberg et al., 2012; Steiner et al., 2003). These unique characteristics of SSRIs in PMDD treatment suggest that the therapeutic effect is not entirely serotonergic. One suggested mechanism is that SSRIs alter the conversion of progesterone to ALLO (Devall et al., 2015; Pinna et al., 2009). According to this hypothesis, SSRIs increase conversion of the progesterone metabolite 5α-dihydroprogesterone (5α-DHP) to ALLO, via SSRI action on enzymes that catalyze this conversion (Griffin and Mellon, 1999; Trauger et al., 2002). Here, the SSRI would be acting as a selective brain steroidogenic stimulant (SBSS) (Pinna et al., 2009, 2006). In fact, research in animals (Matsumoto et al., 2007; Pinna et al., 2006) and humans (Gracia et al., 2009; Pinna et al., 2009; Uzunova et al., 1998) suggest that SSRIs enhance ALLO biosynthesis. Clinically, an open-label trial of sertraline in women with severe PMS or PMDD found that the SSRI increased peripheral ALLO levels in women with low baseline ALLO, and decreased ALLO in women with high baseline levels (Gracia et al., 2009). However, more research is needed in this area.

GABA-modulating drugs

Breakthrough GABA-modulating drugs are being developed for affective disorders, particularly those such as PMDD and postpartum depression (PPD) whose etiology involves NASs. For instance, in March 2019 brexanolone (Zulresso®, Sage Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA, USA), a synthetic version of ALLO, was FDA-approved for postpartum depression (PPD). PPD is similar to PMDD in that NAS changes are believed to contribute to its onset, with ALLO as a key player (Osborne et al., 2017). ALLO levels rise steadily through pregnancy, then drop rapidly following parturition. This rapid withdrawal may, in vulnerable women, result in failure to appropriately upregulate in GABAA-Rs that had gradually downregulated across pregnancy. In Phase II (Kanes et al., 2017) and Phase III clinical trials (Meltzer-Brody et al., 2018), brexanolone rapidly reduced PPD symptoms, within 60 h of administration. Again, this is a much more rapid response than seen with SSRIs for PPD treatment, which can take weeks for symptom relief (Hantsoo et al., 2014; Wisner et al., 2006) compared with <3 days for brexanolone. By acting as a positive allosteric modulator of GABAA-Rs, brexanolone exploits a mechanism that enables rapid symptom relief of PPD. Sepranolone is a similar drug, currently in Phase II clinical trials for PMDD (sepranolone (UC1010), AsarinaPharma, Solna, Sweden). Sepranolone, or isoallopregnanolone (3b–OH–5a-pregnan- 20-one), is an ALLO isomer and GABA-A modulating steroid antagonist (GAMSA). It inhibits the effect of ALLO on GABAA-Rs. In an initial placebo-controlled trial, sepranolone reduced PMDD mood symptom scores by 75% when administered in the luteal phase in women with PMDD (Bixo et al., 2017). Interestingly, sepranolone provided significant reduction in mood symptoms, but not physical symptoms (such as breast tenderness, headaches, bloating) in PMDD. Together, brexanolone and sepranolone represent cutting-edge treatment options for individuals experiencing mood symptoms related to NAS fluctuation. Continued evaluation of these drugs is needed, to reduce barriers to administration and access, and to determine for which patients these medications may be most effective, with attention to factors such as symptom profile, past psychiatric history, and lifetime stress exposure (Morrison et al., 2019; Payne and Maguire, 2019).

Conclusion

Evidence from animal and human literature suggests that PMDD's characteristic waxing and waning symptoms - mood lability, anxiety and irritability - reflect suboptimal GABAA-R response to fluctuating levels of ALLO across the menstrual cycle. PMDD is modeled in rodents via NAS exposure and withdrawal (Gallo and Smith, 1993; Li et al., 2012; Schneider and Popik, 2009; S. Smith et al., 2006), with a rapid NAS withdrawal eliciting symptoms more than a gradual NAS decline (Doornbos et al., 2009). Similarly, women with PMDD have a more rapid late luteal phase drop in progesterone than control women (Lovick et al., 2017). NAS withdrawal may elicit symptoms due to its impact on GABAA-Rs. Multiple studies have found that NAS withdrawal upregulates GABAA-R α4 subunits in the rodent brain (Gulinello et al., 2003; S. Smith et al., 2006; Smith et al., 1998b). Beyond simple up- or downregulation of receptors, some suggest that NAS exposure and withdrawal induces a GABAA-R subunit switch, as opposed to a change in GABA-R density (Shen et al., 2005). Human studies also suggest impaired GABAA-R function in PMDD, including lack of ALLO-induced sedation in the luteal phase (Timby et al., 2016) and elevated APS in the luteal phase relative to controls (Hantsoo et al., 2015). Together, these rodent and human studies support the hypothesis that PMDD represents impaired GABAA-R plasticity, with GABAA-Rs failing to adapt their composition in response to changing ALLO levels across the menstrual cycle. In addition to the core affective symptoms of PMDD, women with the diagnosis also evidence greater objective and subjective sensitivity to stress in the luteal phase. ALLO not only fluctuates across the menstrual cycle, but is released in response to stress. In response to stress, ALLO potentiates GABAergic transmission to promote anxiolysis, and regulates HPA axis function. Alterations in HPA axis response to stress in PMDD (Girdler et al., 2001; Huang et al., 2015; Rasgon et al., 2000; Segebladh et al., 2013) suggest that the disorder may include dysregulated interaction between the HPA and HPG axes, in specific, GABAARs exerting poor control over the HPA axis (Gordon et al., 2015). Thus, impaired ALLO function in PMDD may be implicated in both symptom expression and elevated stress sensitivity. Finally, treatment response in PMDD provides further evidence of altered ALLO-GABA function. SSRIs act rapidly in PMDD, taking effect over the course of days, as opposed to weeks required in other disorders such as major depressive disorder (Landén and Thase, 2006; Steinberg et al., 2012). A suggested mechanism is SSRI enhancement of ALLO biosynthesis from progesterone, stabilizing ALLO levels in the late luteal phase (Gracia et al., 2009; Pinna et al., 2009). However, double-blind controlled trials are needed to properly examine the impact of SSRIs on NAS levels across the menstrual cycle in PMDD. Sepranolone, a novel GABA-modulating drug that inhibits the effect of ALLO on GABAA-Rs, reduced affective symptoms in randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (Bixo et al., 2017). GABA modulating drugs may hold promise for PMDD treatment, but larger trials are needed. While SSRIs and sepranolone involve different mechanisms, both appear to impact ALLO-GABA function, suggesting that if ALLO levels are stabilized or ALLO activity at GABAA-R is inhibited, symptoms diminish. Future studies should continue to test the hypothesis that PMDD reflects impaired interaction between ALLO and GABAA-R. Clarifying the role of NAS dynamics and GABAA-R dynamics across the menstrual cycle, and mechanisms of SSRI action in PMDD, will lead to more effective and tailored treatments for the one in twenty women worldwide who suffer from PMDD.

Funding sources

This work was supported by the (K23 MH107831, Hantsoo).
  112 in total

Review 1.  Fluoxetine and norfluoxetine stereospecifically and selectively increase brain neurosteroid content at doses that are inactive on 5-HT reuptake.

Authors:  Graziano Pinna; Erminio Costa; Alessandro Guidotti
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Allopregnanolone levels before and after selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment of premenstrual symptoms.

Authors:  Clarisa R Gracia; Ellen W Freeman; Mary D Sammel; Hui Lin; Li Sheng; Cheryl Frye
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.153

3.  Elevation of brain allopregnanolone rather than 5-HT release by short term, low dose fluoxetine treatment prevents the estrous cycle-linked increase in stress sensitivity in female rats.

Authors:  Adam J Devall; Julia M Santos; Jonathan P Fry; John W Honour; Marcus L Brandão; Thelma A Lovick
Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 4.600

Review 4.  Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder: Epidemiology and Treatment.

Authors:  Liisa Hantsoo; C Neill Epperson
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.285

5.  Women with premenstrual dysphoric disorder have altered sensitivity to allopregnanolone over the menstrual cycle compared to controls-a pilot study.

Authors:  Erika Timby; Torbjörn Bäckström; Sigrid Nyberg; Hans Stenlund; Anna-Carin N Wihlbäck; Marie Bixo
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  A rodent model of premenstrual dysphoria: progesterone withdrawal induces depression-like behavior that is differentially sensitive to classes of antidepressants.

Authors:  Yan Li; Alan L Pehrson; David P Budac; Connie Sánchez; Maria Gulinello
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  GABA(A)R plasticity during pregnancy: relevance to postpartum depression.

Authors:  Jamie Maguire; Istvan Mody
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Changes in expression and function of extrasynaptic GABAA receptors in the rat hippocampus during pregnancy and after delivery.

Authors:  Enrico Sanna; Maria Cristina Mostallino; Luca Murru; Mario Carta; Giuseppe Talani; Stefano Zucca; Maria Luisa Mura; Elisabetta Maciocco; Giovanni Biggio
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Adrenal response to adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation in patients with premenstrual syndrome.

Authors:  I Lombardi; S Luisi; B Quirici; P Monteleone; F Bernardi; M Liut; E Casarosa; M Palumbo; F Petraglia; A R Genazzani
Journal:  Gynecol Endocrinol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.260

Review 10.  Sex differences in anxiety and depression clinical perspectives.

Authors:  Margaret Altemus; Nilofar Sarvaiya; C Neill Epperson
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 8.606

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  GABA System Modifications During Periods of Hormonal Flux Across the Female Lifespan.

Authors:  Rachel A Gilfarb; Benedetta Leuner
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.617

2.  Development and Psychometric Testing of a New Short-Form of the Premenstrual Symptoms Questionnaire (PSQ-S).

Authors:  Takashi Takeda; Kana Yoshimi; Sayaka Kai; Fumi Inoue
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2022-07-14

3.  Evaluation of a natural S-equol supplement in treating premenstrual symptoms and the effect of the gut microbiota: An open-label pilot study.

Authors:  Takashi Takeda; Yasutaka Chiba
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacol Rep       Date:  2022-02-06

4.  Association Between Smoking and Premenstrual Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  So Hee Choi; Ajna Hamidovic
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 4.157

5.  Effects of oral contraceptive pills on mood and magnetic resonance imaging measures of prefrontal cortical thickness.

Authors:  Nicole Petersen; Nicholas W Kearley; Dara G Ghahremani; Jean-Baptiste Pochon; Megan E Fry; Andrea J Rapkin; Edythe D London
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 15.992

6.  Trends in Research Related to Premenstrual Syndrome and Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder From 1945 to 2018: A Bibliometric Analysis.

Authors:  Mingzhou Gao; Dongmei Gao; Hui Sun; Xunshu Cheng; Li An; Mingqi Qiao
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-04-21

7.  Views of Dutch general practitioners about premenstrual symptoms: A qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Marijke S Labots-Vogelesang; Doreth A M Teunissen; Vivianne Kranenburg; Antoine L M Lagro-Janssen
Journal:  Eur J Gen Pract       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.904

Review 8.  Progesterone and Allopregnanolone Neuroprotective Effects in the Wobbler Mouse Model of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Authors:  Alejandro F De Nicola; María Meyer; Laura Garay; Maria Sol Kruse; Michael Schumacher; Rachida Guennoun; Maria Claudia Gonzalez Deniselle
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 5.046

9.  Response to sertraline is associated with reduction in anxiety-potentiated startle in premenstrual dysphoric disorder.

Authors:  Liisa Hantsoo; Christian Grillon; Mary Sammel; Rachel Johnson; Joanna Marks; C Neill Epperson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 10.  How to study the menstrual cycle: Practical tools and recommendations.

Authors:  Katja M Schmalenberger; Hafsah A Tauseef; Jordan C Barone; Sarah A Owens; Lynne Lieberman; Marc N Jarczok; Susan S Girdler; Jeff Kiesner; Beate Ditzen; Tory A Eisenlohr-Moul
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 4.905

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.