| Literature DB >> 32435496 |
Liqing Kang1, Jian Zhang2,3, Minghao Li1, Nan Xu1, Wei Qi1, Jingwen Tan1, Xiaoyan Lou4, Zhou Yu4, Juanjuan Sun4, Zhenkun Wang5, Chengcheng Fu2,3, Xiaowen Tang2,3, Haiping Dai2,3, Jia Chen2,3, Depei Wu2,3, Lei Yu1,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Treatment with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-engineered T cells directed against the B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) promoted transient recovery from multiple myeloma (MM). However, the absence of this antigen on immature plasma cells may limit the efficacy of this modality and facilitate relapse. The purpose of this study is to characterize a novel CAR that includes both a single-chain variable fragment (scFv)-BCMA and an scFv-CD19 in tandem orientation (tan-CAR) in an attempt to target both BCMA and CD19 expression on MM cells.Entities:
Keywords: BCMA; CD19; Multiple myeloma; Relapse; Tandem-CAR T
Year: 2020 PMID: 32435496 PMCID: PMC7222432 DOI: 10.1186/s40364-020-00192-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomark Res ISSN: 2050-7771
Fig. 1Generation and characterization of tan-CAR T cells. (a) Schematic representation of the plasmid design used to construct single and tandem scFv-CAR-modified T cells. The tan-CAR construct encodes a tandem fusion of the BCMA-scFv and CD19-scFv domains, a CD28 costimulatory domain, and a CD3 zeta-mediated activation signaling domain. (b) Analysis of transduction efficiency. Isolated and activated human T cells were transduced with the lentiviral vectors CD19-CAR, BCMA-CAR, or tan-CAR. Transduction efficiency was evaluated by flow cytometry using fluorescent-tagged protein L to detect variable light chain Ig together with human CD19 and human BCMA protein. (c) Quantitative evaluation of CD4+/CD8+ T-cell ratios. CAR-positive CD4+ T cells and CAR-positive CD8+ T cells were detected by flow cytometry. Data are representative of three donors
Fig. 2Activation, proliferation and cytotoxicity of Tan-CAR T cells. CAR T-cell activation was evaluated by flow cytometric identification of cell surface expression of CD69. CD69 detected on tan-CAR T cells after co-culture with K562 cells overexpressing CD19, BCMA, or both at levels that were comparable to those of the single scFv-CAR T cells co-cultured with target cells expressing their cognate antigens (n = 3). B) Proliferation in response to mitomycin treated K562-transfectant target tumor cells. CAR T cells were labeled with CFSE prior to 5-day co-culture with replication-incompetent target cells. T-cell proliferation was evaluated by flow cytometry. (C)&(D) CAR T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity was evaluated by quantitative assessment of LDH in the supernatants of co-cultured cells as indicated; data are presented as the mean ± SD, *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 vs. un-transduced T cells (NC) from the same donor
Fig. 3CD107a and cytokines release of Tan-CAR T cells responded to antigen-expressing tumor cells. (a) Degranulation of modified T cells was assessed by the appearance of lysosomal protein CD107a on the surface of the CAR T cells in response to co-culture as described. (b) Cytokine release in response to co-culture of CAR T cells and target K562 cells as indicated; cytokines evaluated include IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α, IFN-γ, and IL-17A. Bars represent the mean ± SD of replicate samples. Data are representative of three independent experiments, each with CAR T cells generated from peripheral blood T cells from a different donor
Fig. 4Tan-CAR-transduced T cells effectively clear tumors in vivo. (a) Schematic of the xenograft model used to investigate the activity of tan-CAR T cells in vivo. NSG mice were injected with 7 × 106 K562-transduced luciferase-positive target cells via the tail vein; bioluminescent imaging was performed on day 7 and every 4 days thereafter. CAR T cells (107) or NC T cells (107) were provided by intravenous injection on days 8 and 10. (b) Bioluminescence radiance was used as a surrogate marker for tumor burden. (c) Time course of tumor growth based on mouse whole-body bioluminescence. The mean signal per mouse ± SD is as shown. Statistical analysis was performed using day 19 data (the last time point at which a sufficient number of mice that did not receive treatments remained viable) using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. The data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3); ***p < 0.001