| Literature DB >> 32435286 |
Thamiris V Marsico1, Janine de Camargo2, Roniele S Valente1, Mateus J Sudano1,2.
Abstract
Global cattle genetic market is experiencing a change of strategy, large genetic companies, traditionally recognized in the artificial insemination field, have also begun to operate in the embryo market. Consequently, the demand for in vitro produced (IVP) embryos has grown. However, the overall efficiency of the biotechnology process remains low. Additionally, the lack of homogeneity of post-cryopreservation survival results of IVP embryos still impairing a massive dissemination of this biotechnology in the field. A great challenge for in vitro production labs is to increase the amount of embryos produced with exceptional quality after each round of in vitro fertilization. Herein, we discuss the molecular and cellular features associated with the competence and cryosurvival of IVP embryos. First, morphofunctional, cellular and molecular competence of the embryos were addressed and a relationship between embryo developmental ability and quality were established with cryosurvival and pregnancy success. Additionally, determinant factors of embryo competence and cryosurvival were discussed including the following effects: genotype, oocyte quality and follicular microenvironment, in vitro production conditions, and lipids and other determining molecules. Finally, embryo cryopreservation aspects were addressed and an embryo-focused approach to improve cryosurvival was presented.Entities:
Keywords: bovine; cryopreservation; cryotolerance; embryo quality; in vitro production of embryos; pregnancy success
Year: 2019 PMID: 32435286 PMCID: PMC7234140 DOI: 10.21451/1984-3143-AR2019-0072
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anim Reprod ISSN: 1806-9614 Impact factor: 1.807
Figure 1Total number, in vivo derived (IVD) and in vitro produced (IVP) bovine embryos in the world over the last 20 years (A). Number of cryopreserved IVD and IVP bovine embryos in the world in the last 20 years (B). Source: Data retrieval committee, International embryo technology society – IETS (https://www.iets.org/comm_data.asp?autotry=true&ULnotkn=true, accessed June 2019; and Perry, 2017).
Figure 2Cellular and molecular events required for embryonic developmental competence acquisition and its impact on cryosurvival. Interconnected steps (blue dashed arrows, from the left to the right) to in vitro produce an embryo of superior quality and improved embryo cryosurvival success. Overall environmental and genetic effects on embryo competence acquisition (Black Box). Determinant variables associated with the in vitro production of superior embryo quality (Gold Box, in detail fresh IVP blastocysts with great quality). Successful resumption of development after cryopreservation and cryopreservation technique effects (Green Box, in detail re-expanded IVP blastocysts after warming). All Box events (Black, Gold and Green) impact embryo cryosurvival.
Figure 3Vitrified in vitro produced bovine embryos immediately after warming (A), and following 6 h (B) and 12 h (re-expanded and hatched blastocysts, respectively for C and D) of re-culture.
Post-cryopreservation survival of in vitro produced bovine embryos following slow-freezing and vitrification.
| Reference | Slow-freezing (%) | Vitrification (%) | P-value | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Re-expansion | Hatching | Re-expansion | Hatching | |||||
|
| 62.0a (n = 63) | 81.0A (n=63) | 81.0b (n = 64) | 70.0A (n = 64) | <or>0.05 | |||
|
| 58a (n =73) | - | 86b (n = 64) | - | <0.05 | |||
|
| 40.0a (n = 297) | 22.0A (n = 297) | 64b (n = 297) | 54.0B (n = 297) | <0.05 | |||
|
| 16.7a (n = 275) | 19.6A (n = 275) | 52.1b (n = 265) | 51.3B (n = 265) | <0.05 | |||
| Barceló-Fimbres and Seidel, 2007 | 80.4 (n = 360) | 19.1 (n = 360) | 77.7 (n = 360) | 16.0 (n = 360) | >0.05 | |||
|
| 46.9a (n = 155) | 24.7A (n = 155) | 58b (n = 153) | 36.2B (n = 153) | <0.05 | |||
|
| 88.6 (n = 44) | 75.0A (n = 44) | 100 (n = 44) | 93.2B (n = 44) | <0.05 | |||
Re-expansion rate was evaluated 24h after thawing/warming and hatching/hatched rate was evaluate with 48 or 72 h after thawing/warming according the study methodology. Values without a common lowercase (comparisons between re-expansion rates) or uppercase (comparisons between hatching rates) letters differ (P < 0.05).
Post-cryopreservation survival of in vivo produced bovine embryos following slow-freezing and vitrification.
| Reference | Pregnancy rate (%) | P-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slow-freezing | Vitrification | ||||
|
| 51.8 (n = 27) | 39.1 (n = 23) | >0.05 | ||
|
| 59 (n = 40) | 43 (n = 34) | 0.10 | ||
|
| 45.1 (n = 335) | 44.5 (n = 393) | 0.79 | ||
| Mattos | 19.5 (n = 79) | 17.8 (n = 73) | >0.05 | ||
| 29.8 (n = 102) | 36.6 (n = 100) | >0.05 | |||
|
| 45.2 (n = 62) | 46.7 (n = 30) | >0.05 | ||
Features positively or negatively associated with cryosurvival evaluated so far by our group.
| Variables | Associated Cryosurvival |
|---|---|
| Sire | Positively or Negatively |
| Genotype ( | Positively or Negatively |
| Metabolic regulators and lipolytic molecule | Positively, Negatively or none |
| Embryo origin (IVP | Positively or Negatively |
| Increased embryo quality | Positively |
| Increased fresh apoptosis rate | Negatively |
| Increased cytoplasmic lipid content | Negatively or positively |
| Membrane phospholipids profiles | Negatively or positively |
| Increased serum concentration | Negatively |