| Literature DB >> 32435235 |
Na Li1,2, Fenfen Yan1,2, Nana Wang1,2, Yue Song1,2, Yingxue Yue1,2, Jiaqi Guan1,2, Bailiang Li1,2, Guicheng Huo1,2.
Abstract
Human milk is closely correlated with infant gut microbiota and is important for infant development. However, most infants receive exclusively insufficient breast milk, and the discordance between effects of commercial formula and human milk exists. To elucidate the differences induced by various feeding methods, we determined microbiota and metabolites composition in fecal samples from 77 healthy infants in Northeast China and identified the differences in various feeding methods. Bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis demonstrated that the fecal samples of exclusively breastfed (BF) infants were abundant in Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus; the mixed-fed (MF) infants had the highest abundance of Veillonella and Klebsiella; the exclusively formula-fed (FF) infants were enriched in Bacteroides and Blautia; and the complementary food-fed (CF) infants were associated with higher relative abundance of Lachnoclostridium and Akkermansia. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS)-based metabolomics data revealed that the fecal samples of BF infants had the highest abundance of dl-citrulline, threonine, l-proline, l-glutamine, guanine, and l-arginine; the MF infants were abundant in d-maltose, stearidonic acid, capric acid, and myristic acid; the FF infants were enriched in itaconic acid, 4-pyridoxic acid, prostaglandin B2, thymine, dl-α-hydroxybutyric acid, and orotic acid; and the CF infants were associated with higher relative abundance of taurine, l-tyrosine, adenine, and uric acid. Furthermore, compared with the BF infants, the MF and FF infants were more abundant in fatty acid biosynthesis. Collectively, these findings will provide probable explanations for some of the risks and benefits related to infant feeding methods and will support a theoretical basis for the development of infant formula.Entities:
Keywords: complementary food; formula milk; human milk; infant; metabolite; microbiota
Year: 2020 PMID: 32435235 PMCID: PMC7219020 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00714
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Characteristics of the cohort given, stratified by feeding method.
| Infant age, weeks | 16.4 ± 9.5 | 14.1 ± 6.0a | 12.9 ± 7.7a | 15.8 ± 6.4a | 35.1 ± 4.6b |
| Maternal age in years, year | 26.9 ± 5.0 | 27.9 ± 4.6a | 29.2 ± 4.9b | 22.4 ± 3.3b | 24.0 ± 3.1a |
| Gender of baby, | |||||
| Male | 41 (53.2) | 20 (76.9) | 14 (50.0) | 3 (21.4) | 4 (44.4) |
| Female | 36 (46.8) | 6 (23.1) | 14 (50.0) | 11 (78.6) | 5 (55.6) |
| Gestational age, weeks | 38.7 ± 2.2 | 38.5 ± 2.4a | 38.9 ± 1.4a | 39.0 ± 2.2a | 38.2 ± 3.9a |
| Mode of delivery, | |||||
| Vaginal | 33 (42.9) | 10 (38.5) | 13 (46.4) | 4 (28.6) | 6 (66.7) |
| Cesarean | 44 (57.1) | 16 (61.5) | 15 (53.6) | 10 (71.4) | 3 (33.3) |
| Birth weight, g | 3,466.8 ± 598.8 | 3,509.6 ± 431.3a | 3,536.6 ± 836.9a | 3,215.7 ± 429.8a | 3,516.7 ± 160.1a |
| Birth height, cm | 50.5 ± 1.3 | 50.5 ± 1.3a | 50.6 ± 1.4a | 50.0 ± 0.4a | 50.6 ± 1.3a |
| Parity | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 1.2 ± 0.4a | 1.1 ± 0.4a | 1.1 ± 0.1a | 1.1 ± 0.3a |
| Nationality, | |||||
| Han | 67 (87.0) | 25 (96.2) | 28 (100.0) | 5 (35.7) | 9 (100.0) |
| Manchu | 10 (13.0) | 1 (3.8) | 0 (0.0) | 9 (64.3) | 0 (0.0) |
| Antepartum folic acid (%) | |||||
| Yes | 67 (87.0) | 24 (92.3) | 23 (82.1) | 14 (100.0) | 6 (66.7) |
| No | 10 (13.0) | 2 (7.7) | 5 (17.9) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (33.3) |
| Maternal education, | |||||
| College degree or above | 33 (42.9) | 14 (53.8) | 18 (64.3) | 1 (7.1) | 0 (0.0) |
| High school and vocational education | 21 (27.3) | 6 (23.1) | 4 (14.3) | 9 (64.3) | 2 (22.2) |
| Junior high school education or below | 23 (29.9) | 6 (23.1) | 6 (21.4) | 4 (28.6) | 7 (77.8) |
| Work mode, | |||||
| Full time | 36 (46.8) | 16 (61.5) | 17 (60.7) | 2 (14.3) | 1 (11.1) |
| Part-time | 41 (53.2) | 10 (38.5) | 11 (29.3) | 12 (84.7) | 8 (88.9) |
“±” indicates standard deviation from mean where applicable. Different lowercase letters in the same line indicate significant difference (p < 0.05). Statistical analysis between infants who fed with breast milk (BF), formula (FF), breast milk and formula (MF), or complementary food (CF) was determined using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA, SPSS 17.0) followed by multiple comparisons with Duncan's multiple range test.
Figure 1Microbial community structure of infant stool in various feeding methods. (A) Alpha diversity in groups. (B) Venn diagram of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) among the four groups. (C) Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) on unweighted UniFrac distances in groups; p < 0.001, R2 = 0.1461.
Figure 2(A) Comparison of community composition at the genera level. Only the top 10 most abundant genera are shown for demonstration and clarity. Each column represents a group. (B) Comparison of community composition at the phyla level. Only the top 10 most abundant phyla are shown for demonstration and clarity.
Figure 3Functional differences analysis between the breastfed (BF) group and the other three groups, respectively. (A) The BF group vs. the mixed-fed (MF) group. (B) The BF group vs. the formula-fed (FF) group. (C) The BF group vs. the CF group.
Figure 4(A) Venn diagram of metabolites among all groups. (B) Principal component analysis (PCA) diagram of metabolites in all fecal samples.
Figure 5Heatmap of the most abundant metabolites of four feeding methods, as identified by variable importance in projection (VIP) scores in partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA). Every column represents a different metabolite in stool samples. Higher abundances are marked in red color, whereas lower abundances in blue color.
Figure 6The bubble diagrams of metabolic pathways in level 3. (A) The mixed-fed (MF) group vs. the breastfed (BF) group. (B) The formula-fed (FF) group vs. the BF group. (C) The complementary food-fed (CF) group vs. the BF group.
Figure 7Heatmap diagram representing the correlation between the top 20 microbiota and specific metabolites of the four feeding methods. *p < 0.05.
Figure 8Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) diagram that showed the associations between infant feeding, gut microbiota, and metabolites. The blue dots represent the gut microbiota correlated with the pathways; the lower right picture shows the relationship between pathways and groups.
Figure 9The liner regression diagram of predicted functional differences multiples by bacteria and functional differences multiples of metabolites.