Ysabel C Ilagan-Ying1, Jin Xu1, Joseph K Lim1,2, Albert Do1,2. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine. 2. Section of Digestive Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is the most common liver disease in the USA. Clinical trials have stringent study criteria which may limit real-world generalizability. Thus, we studied whether a real-world, university-based cohort of patients could be eligible for a pivotal phase 3 NASH clinical trial. METHODS: We queried Yale-New Haven Health System electronic medical records for patients with a diagnosis of NASH from 2013 to 2017. Of those who received liver biopsy, we extracted demographic, clinical, laboratory, and biopsy data. We compared patient characteristics to enrollment criteria of the Randomized Global Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Impact on NASH with Fibrosis of Obeticholic Acid Treatment. RESULTS: Of 14 403 patients with NASH, 478 (3.3%) completed liver biopsy, of whom 237 (49.6%) had histological confirmation by a gastrointestinal pathologist. Histologically-confirmed NASH patients were 51.1 ± 13.2 years old, 56.5% female, 69.6% white race, and 24.6% had cirrhosis. In this group, 68 (28.7%) patients met all inclusion criteria, 87 (36.7%) had no exclusions, and 34 (14.4%) met all enrollment criteria. Other than cirrhosis, common reasons for ineligibility were presence of medical comorbidity (n = 83) or laboratory abnormalities (n = 47). Multiple logistic regression did not reveal significant predictors of eligibility. CONCLUSION: Within a university-based cohort of NASH patients, few met phase 3 clinical trial enrollment criteria, mostly due to low rates of liver biopsy. Of those with histologic confirmation, 14.4% met enrollment criteria. Validation of generalizability for safety and efficacy of NASH investigational agents in real-world populations is needed.
OBJECTIVE: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is the most common liver disease in the USA. Clinical trials have stringent study criteria which may limit real-world generalizability. Thus, we studied whether a real-world, university-based cohort of patients could be eligible for a pivotal phase 3 NASH clinical trial. METHODS: We queried Yale-New Haven Health System electronic medical records for patients with a diagnosis of NASH from 2013 to 2017. Of those who received liver biopsy, we extracted demographic, clinical, laboratory, and biopsy data. We compared patient characteristics to enrollment criteria of the Randomized Global Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Impact on NASH with Fibrosis of Obeticholic Acid Treatment. RESULTS: Of 14 403 patients with NASH, 478 (3.3%) completed liver biopsy, of whom 237 (49.6%) had histological confirmation by a gastrointestinal pathologist. Histologically-confirmed NASH patients were 51.1 ± 13.2 years old, 56.5% female, 69.6% white race, and 24.6% had cirrhosis. In this group, 68 (28.7%) patients met all inclusion criteria, 87 (36.7%) had no exclusions, and 34 (14.4%) met all enrollment criteria. Other than cirrhosis, common reasons for ineligibility were presence of medical comorbidity (n = 83) or laboratory abnormalities (n = 47). Multiple logistic regression did not reveal significant predictors of eligibility. CONCLUSION: Within a university-based cohort of NASH patients, few met phase 3 clinical trial enrollment criteria, mostly due to low rates of liver biopsy. Of those with histologic confirmation, 14.4% met enrollment criteria. Validation of generalizability for safety and efficacy of NASH investigational agents in real-world populations is needed.
Authors: Katherine M Flegal; Deanna Kruszon-Moran; Margaret D Carroll; Cheryl D Fryar; Cynthia L Ogden Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-06-07 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: P N Lara; R Higdon; N Lim; K Kwan; M Tanaka; D H Lau; T Wun; J Welborn; F J Meyers; S Christensen; R O'Donnell; C Richman; S A Scudder; J Tuscano; D R Gandara; K S Lam Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-03-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: David E Kleiner; Elizabeth M Brunt; Mark Van Natta; Cynthia Behling; Melissa J Contos; Oscar W Cummings; Linda D Ferrell; Yao-Chang Liu; Michael S Torbenson; Aynur Unalp-Arida; Matthew Yeh; Arthur J McCullough; Arun J Sanyal Journal: Hepatology Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Charlie C Park; Phirum Nguyen; Carolyn Hernandez; Ricki Bettencourt; Kimberly Ramirez; Lynda Fortney; Jonathan Hooker; Ethan Sy; Michael T Savides; Mosab H Alquiraish; Mark A Valasek; Emily Rizo; Lisa Richards; David Brenner; Claude B Sirlin; Rohit Loomba Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2016-10-27 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Kristian Kragholm; Sarah A Goldstein; Qinghong Yang; Renato D Lopes; Phillip J Schulte; Gwen M Bernacki; Harvey D White; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Robert P Giugliano; Paul W Armstrong; Robert A Harrington; Pierluigi Tricoci; Frans Van de Werf; John H Alexander; Karen P Alexander; L Kristin Newby Journal: Circulation Date: 2016-03-08 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Stefano Romeo; Julia Kozlitina; Chao Xing; Alexander Pertsemlidis; David Cox; Len A Pennacchio; Eric Boerwinkle; Jonathan C Cohen; Helen H Hobbs Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2008-09-25 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Yasser Fouad; Melissa Palmer; Minjun Chen; Arie Regev; Rajarshi Banerjee; Rob Myers; Robert Riccio; Richard Torstenson; Ramy Younes; Puneet S Arora; Henrik Landgren; Morten A Karsdal; Martin Blake; David A Shapiro; Hans-Juergen Gruss; Muhammad Y Sheikh; Dina Attia; Steven Bollipo; Alastair D Smith; Bradley Freilich; Robert G Gish; Detlef Schuppan Journal: J Clin Transl Hepatol Date: 2021-10-22