Literature DB >> 32432139

Prognosis factors of advanced gastric cancer according to sex and age.

Abdulaziz Alshehri1, Hussain Alanezi1, Beom Su Kim2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer has a relatively high prevalence and is one of the most common causes of cancer-related death worldwide. However, the prognosis for gastric cancer remains poor, especially in the advanced stages, despite many improvements in diagnosis and treatment. AIM: To evaluate the outcomes regarding advanced gastric cancer development according to sex and age.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 2005 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer between 2002 and 2007 at a single Korean centre. Prognosis and risk factors for nodal involvement were evaluated according to sex and age.
RESULTS: In this retrospective cohort study, we examined the cases of 2005 patients [sex, 1384 men (69%), 621 women (31%)] with advanced gastric cancer. The patients' age range was 22-87 years (mean age: 57.7 ± 12.3 years), with approximately 53.3% of the patients being ≤ 60 years old. Based on a Cox proportional hazards model, overall survival was independently predicted by older age, larger tumour size, lymphovascular invasion, lymph node metastasis, deeper tumour invasion, moderately-to-poorly differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma, and signet ring cell carcinoma. The same model revealed that relapse-free survival was independently predicted by advanced age, larger tumour size, lymphovascular invasion, deeper tumour invasion, poorly differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma, and signet ring cell carcinoma.
CONCLUSION: Among patients with advanced gastric cancer, older age independently predicted poor overall survival and relapse-free survival. However, there were no significant sex-based differences in relapse-free and overall survival. ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adenocarcinoma; Age; Carcinoma; Gastrectomy; Prognosis; Risk factors

Year:  2020        PMID: 32432139      PMCID: PMC7211541          DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i9.1608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Clin Cases        ISSN: 2307-8960            Impact factor:   1.337


  22 in total

1.  Age-specific trends in incidence of noncardia gastric cancer in US adults.

Authors:  William F Anderson; M Constanza Camargo; Joseph F Fraumeni; Pelayo Correa; Philip S Rosenberg; Charles S Rabkin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Gastric cancer: descriptive epidemiology, risk factors, screening, and prevention.

Authors:  Parisa Karimi; Farhad Islami; Sharmila Anandasabapathy; Neal D Freedman; Farin Kamangar
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Signet ring cell type and other histologic types: differing clinical course and prognosis in T1 gastric cancer.

Authors:  Beom Su Kim; Seong Tae Oh; Jeong Hwan Yook; Byung Sik Kim
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Pathology and prognosis of gastric carcinoma: well versus poorly differentiated type.

Authors:  Y Adachi; K Yasuda; M Inomata; K Sato; N Shiraishi; S Kitano
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of signet ring cell carcinoma of the stomach.

Authors:  Kyoung-Joo Kwon; Ki-Nam Shim; Eun-Mi Song; Ju-Young Choi; Seong-Eun Kim; Hye-Kyung Jung; Sung-Ae Jung
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 7.370

6.  Extreme aggressiveness and lethality of gastric adenocarcinoma in the very young.

Authors:  Brian R Smith; Bruce E Stabile
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2009-06

7.  Clinicopathological features and prognosis of gastric cancer in young patients.

Authors:  Shushang Liu; Fan Feng; Guanghui Xu; Zhen Liu; Yangzi Tian; Man Guo; Xiao Lian; Lei Cai; Daiming Fan; Hongwei Zhang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Prediction of Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Korea, 2018.

Authors:  Kyu-Won Jung; Young-Joo Won; Hyun-Joo Kong; Eun Sook Lee
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 4.679

9.  Impact of Age on the Prognosis of Operable Gastric Cancer Patients: An Analysis Based on SEER Database.

Authors:  Jie Chen; Jinggui Chen; Yu Xu; Ziwen Long; Ye Zhou; Huiyan Zhu; Yanong Wang; Yingqiang Shi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Age-specific effects on the prognosis after surgery for gastric cancer: A SEER population-based analysis.

Authors:  Peng Song; Lei Wu; Bo Jiang; Zhijian Liu; Ke Cao; Wenxian Guan
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-07-26
View more
  6 in total

1.  Development and validation of a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-based prognostic nomogram for predicting survival in gastric cancer with multi-organ metastases.

Authors:  Ting Wang; Chuan Liu; Wancong Wang; Binglu Huang; Rong Yu; Mengting Huang; Weiguo Dong
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 0.496

2.  Prognostic Nomograms to Predict Survival of Patients with Resectable Gallbladder Cancer: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Based Analysis.

Authors:  Yan Lin; Hua Chen; Fan Pan
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2021-03-30

3.  Epigallocatechin Gallate Enhances Inhibition Effect of DDP on the Proliferation of Gastric Cancer BGC-823 Cells by Regulating p19Arf-p53-p21Cip1 Signaling Pathway.

Authors:  Mengya Xue; XiaoLv Liu; Bing Cheng; XingKai Rui; MingCai Wu; Jun Lv
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2021-04-01

4.  The Value of Whole-Tumor Histogram and Texture Analysis Using Intravoxel Incoherent Motion in Differentiating Pathologic Subtypes of Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Huan-Huan Li; Bo Sun; Cong Tan; Rong Li; Cai-Xia Fu; Robert Grimm; Hui Zhu; Wei-Jun Peng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Survival nomogram for different grades of gastric cancer patients based on SEER database and external validation cohort.

Authors:  Lei Hu; Kang Yang; Yue Chen; Chenyu Sun; Xu Wang; Shaopu Zhu; Shiyi Yang; Guodong Cao; Maoming Xiong; Bo Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 5.738

6.  A Practical Nomogram for Predicting the Prognosis of Elderly Patients with Gastric Adenocarcinoma After Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Heli Yang; Xin Ji; Chenggen Jin; Ke Ji; Ziyu Jia; Xiaojiang Wu; Ji Zhang; Zhaode Bu
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-01-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.