Literature DB >> 32431959

Algorithmic approaches to clonal reconstruction in heterogeneous cell populations.

Wazim Mohammed Ismail1, Etienne Nzabarushimana1, Haixu Tang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The reconstruction of clonal haplotypes and their evolutionary history in evolving populations is a common problem in both microbial evolutionary biology and cancer biology. The clonal theory of evolution provides a theoretical framework for modeling the evolution of clones.
RESULTS: In this paper, we review the theoretical framework and assumptions over which the clonal reconstruction problem is formulated. We formally define the problem and then discuss the complexity and solution space of the problem. Various methods have been proposed to find the phylogeny that best explains the observed data. We categorize these methods based on the type of input data that they use (space-resolved or time-resolved), and also based on their computational formulation as either combinatorial or probabilistic. It is crucial to understand the different types of input data because each provides essential but distinct information for drastically reducing the solution space of the clonal reconstruction problem. Complementary information provided by single cell sequencing or from whole genome sequencing of randomly isolated clones can also improve the accuracy of clonal reconstruction. We briefly review the existing algorithms and their relationships. Finally we summarize the tools that are developed for either directly solving the clonal reconstruction problem or a related computational problem.
CONCLUSIONS: In this review, we discuss the various formulations of the problem of inferring the clonal evolutionary history from allele frequeny data, review existing algorithms and catergorize them according to their problem formulation and solution approaches. We note that most of the available clonal inference algorithms were developed for elucidating tumor evolution whereas clonal reconstruction for unicellular genomes are less addressed. We conclude the review by discussing more open problems such as the lack of benchmark datasets and comparison of performance between available tools.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bacteria evolution; clonal reconstruction problem; clonal theory; combinatorial algorithm; infinite sites assumption; probabilistic algorithm; tumor evolution

Year:  2019        PMID: 32431959      PMCID: PMC7236794          DOI: 10.1007/s40484-019-0188-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Biol        ISSN: 2095-4689


  51 in total

1.  PyClone: statistical inference of clonal population structure in cancer.

Authors:  Andrew Roth; Jaswinder Khattra; Damian Yap; Adrian Wan; Emma Laks; Justina Biele; Gavin Ha; Samuel Aparicio; Alexandre Bouchard-Côté; Sohrab P Shah
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2014-03-16       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  Epistasis and allele specificity in the emergence of a stable polymorphism in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Jessica Plucain; Thomas Hindré; Mickaël Le Gac; Olivier Tenaillon; Stéphane Cruveiller; Claudine Médigue; Nicholas Leiby; William R Harcombe; Christopher J Marx; Richard E Lenski; Dominique Schneider
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Inferring the Mutational History of a Tumor Using Multi-state Perfect Phylogeny Mixtures.

Authors:  Mohammed El-Kebir; Gryte Satas; Layla Oesper; Benjamin J Raphael
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 10.304

4.  The number of heterozygous nucleotide sites maintained in a finite population due to steady flux of mutations.

Authors:  M Kimura
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1969-04       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Escherichia coli cultures maintain stable subpopulation structure during long-term evolution.

Authors:  Megan G Behringer; Brian I Choi; Samuel F Miller; Thomas G Doak; Jonathan A Karty; Wanfeng Guo; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Mutation Rate Inferred From Synonymous Substitutions in a Long-Term Evolution Experiment With Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Sébastien Wielgoss; Jeffrey E Barrick; Olivier Tenaillon; Stéphane Cruveiller; Béatrice Chane-Woon-Ming; Claudine Médigue; Richard E Lenski; Dominique Schneider
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 3.154

7.  PhyloWGS: reconstructing subclonal composition and evolution from whole-genome sequencing of tumors.

Authors:  Amit G Deshwar; Shankar Vembu; Christina K Yung; Gun Ho Jang; Lincoln Stein; Quaid Morris
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 13.583

8.  TITAN: inference of copy number architectures in clonal cell populations from tumor whole-genome sequence data.

Authors:  Gavin Ha; Andrew Roth; Jaswinder Khattra; Julie Ho; Damian Yap; Leah M Prentice; Nataliya Melnyk; Andrew McPherson; Ali Bashashati; Emma Laks; Justina Biele; Jiarui Ding; Alan Le; Jamie Rosner; Karey Shumansky; Marco A Marra; C Blake Gilks; David G Huntsman; Jessica N McAlpine; Samuel Aparicio; Sohrab P Shah
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Computing tumor trees from single cells.

Authors:  Alexander Davis; Nicholas E Navin
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  Sustained fitness gains and variability in fitness trajectories in the long-term evolution experiment with Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Richard E Lenski; Michael J Wiser; Noah Ribeck; Zachary D Blount; Joshua R Nahum; J Jeffrey Morris; Luis Zaman; Caroline B Turner; Brian D Wade; Rohan Maddamsetti; Alita R Burmeister; Elizabeth J Baird; Jay Bundy; Nkrumah A Grant; Kyle J Card; Maia Rowles; Kiyana Weatherspoon; Spiridon E Papoulis; Rachel Sullivan; Colleen Clark; Joseph S Mulka; Neerja Hajela
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.