Literature DB >> 27467246

Inferring the Mutational History of a Tumor Using Multi-state Perfect Phylogeny Mixtures.

Mohammed El-Kebir1, Gryte Satas1, Layla Oesper2, Benjamin J Raphael3.   

Abstract

Phylogenetic techniques are increasingly applied to infer the somatic mutational history of a tumor from DNA sequencing data. However, standard phylogenetic tree reconstruction techniques do not account for the fact that bulk sequencing data measures mutations in a population of cells. We formulate and solve the multi-state perfect phylogeny mixture deconvolution problem of reconstructing a phylogenetic tree given mixtures of its leaves, under the multi-state perfect phylogeny, or infinite alleles model. Our somatic phylogeny reconstruction using combinatorial enumeration (SPRUCE) algorithm uses this model to construct phylogenetic trees jointly from single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and copy-number aberrations (CNAs). We show that SPRUCE addresses complexities in simultaneous analysis of SNVs and CNAs. In particular, there are often many possible phylogenetic trees consistent with the data, but the ambiguity decreases considerably with an increasing number of samples. These findings have implications for tumor sequencing strategies, suggest caution in drawing strong conclusions based on a single tree reconstruction, and explain difficulties faced by applying existing phylogenetic techniques to tumor sequencing data.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27467246     DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2016.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Syst        ISSN: 2405-4712            Impact factor:   10.304


  59 in total

1.  CALDER: Inferring Phylogenetic Trees from Longitudinal Tumor Samples.

Authors:  Matthew A Myers; Gryte Satas; Benjamin J Raphael
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 10.304

Review 2.  The evolution of tumour phylogenetics: principles and practice.

Authors:  Russell Schwartz; Alejandro A Schäffer
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Phylogenetic Copy-Number Factorization of Multiple Tumor Samples.

Authors:  Simone Zaccaria; Mohammed El-Kebir; Gunnar W Klau; Benjamin J Raphael
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 1.479

4.  Differential Allele-Specific Expression Uncovers Breast Cancer Genes Dysregulated by Cis Noncoding Mutations.

Authors:  Pawel F Przytycki; Mona Singh
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 10.304

Review 5.  Machine learning approaches to drug response prediction: challenges and recent progress.

Authors:  George Adam; Ladislav Rampášek; Zhaleh Safikhani; Petr Smirnov; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Anna Goldenberg
Journal:  NPJ Precis Oncol       Date:  2020-06-15

Review 6.  Intratumoral Heterogeneity in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Chaos and Consequence.

Authors:  Vidya C Sinha; Helen Piwnica-Worms
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 2.673

7.  A Two-State Model of Tree Evolution and Its Applications to Alu Retrotransposition.

Authors:  Niema Moshiri; Siavash Mirarab
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 15.683

Review 8.  A population genetics perspective on the determinants of intra-tumor heterogeneity.

Authors:  Zheng Hu; Ruping Sun; Christina Curtis
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 10.680

9.  Assessing intratumor heterogeneity and tracking longitudinal and spatial clonal evolutionary history by next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Yuchao Jiang; Yu Qiu; Andy J Minn; Nancy R Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  SCARLET: Single-cell tumor phylogeny inference with copy-number constrained mutation losses.

Authors:  Gryte Satas; Simone Zaccaria; Geoffrey Mon; Benjamin J Raphael
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 10.304

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.