Literature DB >> 32431942

Crystal structure and DFT computational studies of (E)-2,4-di-tert-butyl-6-{[3-(tri-fluoro-meth-yl)benz-yl]imino-meth-yl}phenol.

Nihal Kan Kaynar1, Hasan Tanak1, Mustafa Macit2, Namık Özdemir3.   

Abstract

The title compound, C23H28F3NO, is an ortho-hy-droxy Schiff base compound, which adopts the enol-imine tautomeric form in the solid state. The mol-ecular structure is not planar and the dihedral angle between the planes of the aromatic rings is 85.52 (10)°. The tri-fluoro-methyl group shows rotational disorder over two sites, with occupancies of 0.798 (6) and 0.202 (6). An intra-molecular O-H⋯N hydrogen bonding generates an S(6) ring motif. The crystal structure is consolidated by C-H⋯π inter-actions. The mol-ecular structure was optimized via density functional theory (DFT) methods with the B3LYP functional and LanL2DZ basis set. The theoretical structure is in good agreement with the experimental data. The frontier orbitals and mol-ecular electrostatic potential map were also examined by DFT computations. © Kan Kaynar et al. 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DFT; Schiff base; crystal structure; enol–imine; rotational disorder; tert-but­yl

Year:  2020        PMID: 32431942      PMCID: PMC7199268          DOI: 10.1107/S205698902000537X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

Schiff base ligands have played an important role in the development of coordination chemistry, specifically in relation to magnetism, enzymatic reactions (Moutet & Ourari, 1997 ▸) and mol­ecular architectures (Kaynar et al., 2018 ▸). Schiff bases and their metal complexes have been used in anti­bacterial, anti­cancer, anti­fungal, anti­tubercular and hypothermic reagents (Marchant et al., 1981 ▸; Turwatker & Mahta, 2007 ▸). Generally, ortho-hy­droxy Schiff base compounds display two tautomeric, enol–imine (OH) and keto–amine (NH), forms. Depending on the tautomers, two types of intra­molecular hydrogen bonds are observed in ortho-hy­droxy Schiff bases, namely, O—H⋯N in enol–imine and N—H⋯O in keto–amine tautomers (Tanak et al., 2009 ▸, 2010 ▸). In this study, we report the synthesis, crystal structure and density functional theory (DFT) calculations of the title Schiff base compound.

Structural commentary

The mol­ecular structure of the title compound is shown in Fig. 1 ▸(a). The crystal structure is monoclinic and has the space-group type P21/c. The CF3 group exhibits rotational disorder [Fig. 1 ▸(a)]. The site-occupancy factors are 0.798 (6) and 0.202 (6) for F1A/F2A/F3A and F1B/F2B/F3B, respectively. The DFT computations of the title compound were performed with the Gaussian 09W program package (Frisch et al., 2009 ▸) using the B3LYP functional and the LanL2DZ basis set. The optimized mol­ecular structure is illustrated in Fig. 1 ▸(b). Some selected theoretical bond lengths, bond angles and torsion angles are given in Table 1 ▸ along with the experimental values. The mol­ecular structure of the title compound is not planar: the dihedral angle between the 2,4-di-tert-butyl­phenol and the tri­fluoro­methyl rings is 85.52 (10)°. This dihedral angle was calculated to be 65.73° for the B3LYP computationally derived structure. The imino group is nearly coplanar with the 2,4-di-tert-butyl­phenol ring, as indicated by the C1—C14—C15—N1 torsion angle [−3.9 (3)° for X-ray and −0.14° for B3LYP]. There is an intra­molecular O1—H1⋯N1 hydrogen bond present (Fig. 1 ▸ and Table 2 ▸), generating an S(6) ring motif. The C1—O1 bond length [1.353 (2) Å for X-ray and 1.376 Å for B3LYP] indicates single-bond character. The imine C15=N1 bond length [1.273 (2) Å for X-ray and 1.308 Å for B3LYP] indicates double-bond character. In the title compound, the bond lengths and bond angles are within normal ranges and they are comparable with those in related Schiff base structures (Li et al., 2007 ▸; Sun et al., 2007 ▸; Çelik et al., 2009 ▸; Şahin et al., 2009 ▸; Kansiz et al., 2018 ▸). The C1—O1 and C15=N1 bond lengths confirm the enol–imine form of the title compound (Tanak, 2011 ▸; Kaynar et al., 2018 ▸).
Figure 1

(a) The mol­ecular structure of the title compound, showing the atom-numbering scheme and 20% probability displacement ellipsoids and (b) the optimized mol­ecular structure of the title compound generated at the DFT/B3LYP/LanL2DZ level.

Table 1

Some selected bond lengths, bond angles and torsion angles (Å, °) in the experimentally determined and computed mol­ecular structures

ParametersX-rayDFT
O1—C11.353 (2)1.376
N1—C151.273 (2)1.308
N1—C161.457 (3)1.467
C14—C151.456 (3)1.457
   
C15—N1—C16118.68 (18)120.83
O1—C1—C2119.87 (16)120.63
O1—C1—C14119.60 (17)119.16
N1—C15—C14122.99 (18)121.96
N1—C16—C17113.09 (16)112.67
   
O1—C1—C14—C152.2 (3)0.28
C16—N1—C15—C14178.67 (18)178.34
C13—C14—C15—N1175.7 (2)179.87
C15—N1—C16—C17107.5 (2)130.42
Table 2

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

Cg1 and Cg2 are the centroids of the C1/C2/C7/C8/C13/C14 and C17–C23 rings, respectively.

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O1—H1⋯N10.92 (3)1.73 (3)2.587 (2)154 (3)
C16—H16BCg2i 0.972.773.705 (3)162
C21—H21⋯Cg1ii 0.932.853.631 (3)143

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

Supra­molecular features

The crystal structure of the title compound is consolidated by C—H⋯π inter­actions (Fig. 2 ▸), details of which are summarized in Table 2 ▸. A packing diagram is shown in Fig. 3 ▸. The only other inter­actions are van der Waals contacts.
Figure 2

A partial packing plot of the title crystal. Dashed lines indicate the O—H⋯N intra­molecular hydrogen bonding and C—H⋯π inter­actions.

Figure 3

The crystal packing of the title compound, viewed along the a axis.

Mol­ecular electrostatic potential (MEP)

The mol­ecular electrostatic potential (MEP) is a very useful descriptor for classifying and understanding regions that are susceptible to electrophilic versus nucleophilic attack. In order to analyse reactive regions for electrophilic and nucleophilic reactions for the investigated Schiff base mol­ecule, the MEP surface was computed using the B3LYP/LanL2DZ basis set for the optimized geometry. In the MEP surface, the negative potential regions (red areas) are associated with electrophilic reactivity, while the positive potential regions (blue areas) are related to nucleophilic reactivity. The MEP surface of the compound is shown in Fig. 4 ▸. The negative MEP regions are mainly over the O1, F1, F2, and F3 atoms and have values of −0.049 a.u., −0.031 a.u., −0.032 a.u. and −0.035 a.u., respectively. The largest maximum positive MEP region is localized on atom H15, and has a value of +0.048 a.u. According to these results, the preferred sites for electrophilic attack are around the oxygen and fluorine atoms, while the preferred region for nucleophilic attack is the imine group C—H atom, H15.
Figure 4

The mol­ecular electrostatic potential map of the title compound.

Frontier mol­ecular orbitals

The highest occupied mol­ecular orbitals (HOMOs) and lowest unoccupied mol­ecular orbitals (LUMOs) are known as frontier mol­ecular orbitals. The electronic, optical and chemical reactivity properties of compounds are predicted by their frontier mol­ecular orbitals (Tanak, 2019 ▸). The frontier mol­ecular orbitals of the title compound were obtained using the DFT/B3LYP method with the LanL2DZ basis set. The energy levels and distributions of the frontier mol­ecular orbitals are shown in Fig. 5 ▸. The HOMO–LUMO gap is used to analyse the chemical reactivity and stability of a mol­ecule. If the mol­ecule has a large HOMO–LUMO gap, the mol­ecule is more stable and less chemically reactive. The term ‘hard mol­ecule’ is used to describe such cases. The electron affinity (A = -E HOMO), the ionization potential (I = -E LUMO), HOMO–LUMO energy gap (ΔE), the chemical hardness (η) and softness (S) of the title compound were predicted based on the E HOMO and E LUMO energies (Tanak, 2019 ▸). For the title compound, I = 5.912 eV, A= 1.807 eV, ΔE = 4.105 eV, η = 2.052 eV and S = 0.243 eV. As a result of the large ΔE and η values, the title compound can be classified as a hard mol­ecule.
Figure 5

The frontier mol­ecular orbitals.

Synthesis and crystallization

(E)-2,4-Di-tert-butyl-6-((3-(tri­fluoro­meth­yl)benzyl­imino)meth­yl)phenol was prepared by refluxing a mixture of a solution containing 3,5-di-tert-butyl-2-hy­droxy­benzaldehyde (46.8 mg, 0.2 mmol) in ethanol (30 ml) and a solution containing 3-(tri­fluoro­meth­yl)benzyl­amine (35.03 mg, 0.2 mmol) in ethanol (20 ml). The reaction mixture was stirred for 4 h under reflux. The title compound was obtained by slow evaporation of an ethanol solution (m.p. 401–403 K; yield 78%)

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 3 ▸. C-bound H atoms were positioned geometrically and refined using a riding model, with C—H = 0.93–0.97 Å and U iso(H) = 1.2–1.5U eq(C). The position of the H1 atom was obtained from a difference map of the electron density in the unit cell and was refined freely.
Table 3

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC23H28F3NO
M r 391.46
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)296
a, b, c (Å)15.6783 (10), 15.7880 (14), 8.7054 (5)
β (°)91.217 (5)
V3)2154.4 (3)
Z 4
Radiation typeMo Kα
μ (mm−1)0.09
Crystal size (mm)0.72 × 0.56 × 0.09
 
Data collection
DiffractometerSTOE IPDS 2
Absorption correctionIntegration (X-RED32; Stoe & Cie, 2002)
T min, T max 0.938, 0.992
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections24168, 4981, 2875
R int 0.062
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.652
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.059, 0.149, 1.01
No. of reflections4981
No. of parameters291
No. of restraints67
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.17, −0.14

Computer programs: X-AREA and X-RED32 (Stoe & Cie, 2002 ▸), SHELXS97 and SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸) and ORTEP-3 for Windows and WinGX (Farrugia, 2012 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, namiko43. DOI: 10.1107/S205698902000537X/pk2624sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S205698902000537X/pk2624Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S205698902000537X/pk2624Isup3.cml CCDC reference: 1997654 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C23H28F3NOF(000) = 832
Mr = 391.46Dx = 1.207 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 15.6783 (10) ÅCell parameters from 19720 reflections
b = 15.7880 (14) Åθ = 1.8–28.0°
c = 8.7054 (5) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
β = 91.217 (5)°T = 296 K
V = 2154.4 (3) Å3Plate, orange
Z = 40.72 × 0.56 × 0.09 mm
STOE IPDS 2 diffractometer4981 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube2875 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.062
Detector resolution: 6.67 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.6°, θmin = 2.6°
rotation method scansh = −20→20
Absorption correction: integration (X-RED32; Stoe & Cie, 2002)k = −20→20
Tmin = 0.938, Tmax = 0.992l = −10→11
24168 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.059Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.149H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.01w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.072P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
4981 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
291 parametersΔρmax = 0.17 e Å3
67 restraintsΔρmin = −0.14 e Å3
Experimental. 248 frames, detector distance = 80 mm
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
F1A0.82817 (19)0.75361 (18)1.1564 (8)0.1412 (18)0.798 (6)
F2A0.8487 (2)0.6371 (4)1.2628 (5)0.1492 (18)0.798 (6)
F3A0.86847 (16)0.6497 (4)1.0276 (5)0.1431 (18)0.798 (6)
F1B0.8509 (6)0.7243 (11)1.0355 (15)0.108 (4)0.202 (6)
F2B0.8298 (5)0.7109 (13)1.2651 (14)0.112 (4)0.202 (6)
F3B0.8690 (5)0.6084 (6)1.140 (2)0.119 (4)0.202 (6)
O10.42489 (9)0.60037 (10)0.54544 (18)0.0583 (4)
N10.47793 (10)0.69181 (11)0.77476 (19)0.0517 (4)
C10.34413 (11)0.61230 (12)0.5935 (2)0.0442 (4)
C20.27563 (12)0.57558 (12)0.5121 (2)0.0474 (5)
C30.28920 (14)0.52313 (15)0.3652 (2)0.0604 (6)
C40.3291 (2)0.57867 (19)0.2417 (3)0.0900 (9)
H4A0.38430.59770.27700.135*
H4B0.29310.62680.22160.135*
H4C0.33500.54640.14900.135*
C50.34662 (19)0.44671 (17)0.4018 (3)0.0866 (8)
H5A0.40100.46620.44050.130*
H5B0.35460.41420.31010.130*
H5C0.32020.41200.47790.130*
C60.20508 (18)0.4890 (2)0.2985 (3)0.0923 (9)
H6A0.21600.45650.20780.138*
H6B0.16800.53540.27280.138*
H6C0.17840.45350.37320.138*
C70.19492 (12)0.58784 (13)0.5719 (2)0.0520 (5)
H70.14870.56390.51920.062*
C80.17838 (12)0.63327 (13)0.7047 (2)0.0539 (5)
C90.08888 (13)0.64131 (16)0.7727 (3)0.0680 (6)
C100.02115 (17)0.5997 (3)0.6718 (5)0.1314 (15)
H10A−0.03380.60800.71590.197*
H10B0.03270.54020.66420.197*
H10C0.02160.62460.57120.197*
C110.0905 (2)0.5998 (3)0.9306 (4)0.1116 (12)
H11A0.13380.62610.99420.167*
H11B0.10280.54060.92020.167*
H11C0.03590.60670.97700.167*
C120.06544 (18)0.7341 (2)0.7915 (4)0.1009 (10)
H12A0.06390.76110.69260.151*
H12B0.10730.76150.85650.151*
H12C0.01040.73840.83710.151*
C130.24757 (12)0.67031 (14)0.7790 (2)0.0550 (5)
H130.23880.70240.86680.066*
C140.32996 (11)0.66083 (12)0.7260 (2)0.0463 (5)
C150.40013 (12)0.70132 (13)0.8100 (2)0.0512 (5)
H150.38750.73570.89320.061*
C160.54326 (13)0.73660 (13)0.8642 (3)0.0547 (5)
H16A0.51620.77970.92580.066*
H16B0.58140.76500.79450.066*
C170.59483 (12)0.67922 (12)0.9685 (2)0.0456 (4)
C180.67935 (12)0.69802 (13)1.0007 (2)0.0509 (5)
H180.70440.74460.95430.061*
C190.72737 (13)0.64835 (15)1.1014 (2)0.0581 (5)
C200.81794 (16)0.6718 (2)1.1355 (4)0.0818 (7)
C210.69155 (16)0.57852 (15)1.1692 (3)0.0685 (6)
H210.72390.54451.23530.082*
C220.60725 (16)0.55961 (15)1.1381 (3)0.0706 (7)
H220.58240.51291.18450.085*
C230.55955 (14)0.60916 (14)1.0392 (2)0.0571 (5)
H230.50270.59551.01920.069*
H10.4592 (18)0.6288 (18)0.616 (3)0.088 (9)*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
F1A0.0791 (18)0.100 (2)0.242 (5)−0.0161 (14)−0.055 (3)−0.027 (2)
F2A0.099 (2)0.203 (4)0.143 (3)−0.021 (2)−0.066 (2)0.050 (3)
F3A0.0563 (14)0.225 (5)0.149 (3)−0.002 (2)0.0203 (16)−0.047 (3)
F1B0.060 (5)0.146 (9)0.116 (7)−0.030 (6)−0.012 (5)0.022 (7)
F2B0.073 (5)0.162 (10)0.102 (6)−0.002 (7)−0.011 (5)−0.046 (6)
F3B0.075 (5)0.130 (7)0.151 (10)0.046 (5)−0.023 (7)−0.009 (6)
O10.0422 (8)0.0723 (10)0.0606 (9)−0.0033 (7)0.0091 (7)−0.0136 (8)
N10.0455 (9)0.0569 (10)0.0526 (9)−0.0018 (7)−0.0032 (7)−0.0023 (8)
C10.0407 (10)0.0457 (10)0.0465 (10)0.0016 (8)0.0054 (8)0.0020 (9)
C20.0491 (11)0.0469 (11)0.0462 (11)−0.0004 (8)0.0016 (9)−0.0005 (9)
C30.0616 (13)0.0663 (14)0.0532 (12)−0.0070 (10)0.0051 (10)−0.0139 (11)
C40.115 (2)0.105 (2)0.0502 (14)−0.0252 (17)0.0177 (14)−0.0142 (14)
C50.0966 (19)0.0724 (17)0.0909 (19)0.0110 (14)0.0060 (15)−0.0301 (15)
C60.0825 (18)0.114 (2)0.0805 (17)−0.0190 (16)−0.0042 (14)−0.0440 (17)
C70.0446 (11)0.0576 (12)0.0536 (11)−0.0041 (9)−0.0025 (9)−0.0021 (10)
C80.0420 (10)0.0612 (13)0.0586 (12)0.0046 (9)0.0044 (9)−0.0025 (10)
C90.0438 (11)0.0861 (17)0.0744 (15)0.0031 (11)0.0112 (10)−0.0033 (13)
C100.0439 (14)0.200 (4)0.151 (3)−0.0211 (19)0.0191 (17)−0.066 (3)
C110.0784 (19)0.144 (3)0.114 (3)0.0155 (19)0.0436 (18)0.036 (2)
C120.0669 (17)0.107 (2)0.130 (3)0.0267 (16)0.0250 (17)−0.003 (2)
C130.0492 (11)0.0631 (13)0.0528 (11)0.0048 (9)0.0041 (9)−0.0113 (10)
C140.0426 (10)0.0490 (11)0.0473 (10)0.0027 (8)0.0008 (8)−0.0026 (9)
C150.0521 (12)0.0519 (11)0.0494 (11)0.0026 (9)0.0001 (9)−0.0063 (9)
C160.0508 (11)0.0525 (12)0.0607 (12)−0.0066 (9)−0.0058 (9)0.0001 (10)
C170.0476 (10)0.0460 (11)0.0433 (10)−0.0035 (8)0.0035 (8)−0.0069 (8)
C180.0475 (11)0.0524 (12)0.0530 (11)−0.0068 (9)0.0040 (9)−0.0036 (9)
C190.0515 (11)0.0658 (14)0.0569 (12)0.0044 (10)−0.0030 (9)−0.0076 (11)
C200.0551 (13)0.0978 (19)0.0921 (18)0.0080 (13)−0.0109 (13)−0.0007 (15)
C210.0743 (16)0.0650 (15)0.0655 (15)0.0072 (12)−0.0106 (12)0.0095 (12)
C220.0817 (17)0.0594 (14)0.0706 (15)−0.0142 (12)−0.0044 (13)0.0155 (12)
C230.0558 (12)0.0585 (13)0.0570 (12)−0.0127 (10)−0.0018 (10)0.0007 (11)
F1A—C201.313 (4)C7—C81.390 (3)
F2A—C201.318 (4)C8—C131.381 (3)
F3A—C201.290 (4)C8—C91.540 (3)
F1B—C201.315 (6)C9—C101.514 (4)
F2B—C201.296 (6)C9—C121.521 (4)
F3B—C201.282 (6)C9—C111.522 (4)
O1—C11.355 (2)C13—C141.389 (3)
N1—C151.273 (2)C14—C151.456 (3)
N1—C161.457 (3)C16—C171.506 (3)
C1—C21.400 (3)C17—C181.381 (3)
C1—C141.406 (3)C17—C231.387 (3)
C2—C71.392 (3)C18—C191.386 (3)
C2—C31.542 (3)C19—C211.376 (3)
C3—C61.528 (3)C19—C201.491 (3)
C3—C41.531 (3)C21—C221.376 (3)
C3—C51.535 (4)C22—C231.373 (3)
C15—N1—C16118.71 (18)C18—C17—C16119.59 (17)
O1—C1—C2119.84 (17)C23—C17—C16122.23 (17)
O1—C1—C14119.60 (17)C17—C18—C19120.85 (19)
C2—C1—C14120.55 (16)C21—C19—C18120.2 (2)
C7—C2—C1116.51 (17)C21—C19—C20120.6 (2)
C7—C2—C3121.84 (18)C18—C19—C20119.2 (2)
C1—C2—C3121.64 (17)F3B—C20—F3A54.5 (8)
C6—C3—C4107.3 (2)F3B—C20—F2B105.4 (10)
C6—C3—C5107.4 (2)F3A—C20—F2B133.2 (5)
C4—C3—C5110.5 (2)F3B—C20—F1A133.6 (5)
C6—C3—C2111.79 (18)F3A—C20—F1A107.0 (4)
C4—C3—C2109.91 (19)F2B—C20—F1A52.9 (9)
C5—C3—C2109.89 (19)F3B—C20—F1B105.1 (10)
C8—C7—C2124.77 (19)F3A—C20—F1B55.4 (8)
C13—C8—C7116.71 (17)F2B—C20—F1B103.0 (10)
C13—C8—C9119.89 (19)F1A—C20—F1B54.8 (7)
C7—C8—C9123.37 (19)F3B—C20—F2A55.3 (8)
C10—C9—C12108.2 (3)F3A—C20—F2A106.3 (3)
C10—C9—C11109.6 (3)F2B—C20—F2A54.8 (8)
C12—C9—C11108.5 (3)F1A—C20—F2A104.5 (4)
C10—C9—C8112.0 (2)F1B—C20—F2A132.6 (4)
C12—C9—C8110.2 (2)F3B—C20—C19113.8 (5)
C11—C9—C8108.3 (2)F3A—C20—C19112.6 (3)
C8—C13—C14121.71 (19)F2B—C20—C19114.2 (4)
C13—C14—C1119.70 (18)F1A—C20—C19112.7 (2)
C13—C14—C15118.93 (17)F1B—C20—C19114.2 (4)
C1—C14—C15121.36 (16)F2A—C20—C19113.2 (3)
N1—C15—C14123.01 (18)C19—C21—C22119.2 (2)
N1—C16—C17113.12 (16)C23—C22—C21120.5 (2)
C18—C17—C23118.13 (19)C22—C23—C17121.1 (2)
O1—C1—C2—C7177.52 (18)C16—N1—C15—C14178.69 (18)
C14—C1—C2—C7−1.8 (3)C13—C14—C15—N1175.7 (2)
O1—C1—C2—C3−1.6 (3)C1—C14—C15—N1−3.9 (3)
C14—C1—C2—C3179.11 (19)C15—N1—C16—C17107.5 (2)
C7—C2—C3—C60.3 (3)N1—C16—C17—C18148.23 (18)
C1—C2—C3—C6179.3 (2)N1—C16—C17—C23−34.4 (3)
C7—C2—C3—C4119.4 (2)C23—C17—C18—C19−0.2 (3)
C1—C2—C3—C4−61.6 (3)C16—C17—C18—C19177.26 (19)
C7—C2—C3—C5−118.9 (2)C17—C18—C19—C210.9 (3)
C1—C2—C3—C560.2 (3)C17—C18—C19—C20−178.8 (2)
C1—C2—C7—C80.0 (3)C21—C19—C20—F3B42.0 (11)
C3—C2—C7—C8179.0 (2)C18—C19—C20—F3B−138.3 (10)
C2—C7—C8—C131.8 (3)C21—C19—C20—F3A101.8 (4)
C2—C7—C8—C9−176.4 (2)C18—C19—C20—F3A−78.5 (4)
C13—C8—C9—C10177.7 (3)C21—C19—C20—F2B−79.1 (12)
C7—C8—C9—C10−4.3 (4)C18—C19—C20—F2B100.6 (12)
C13—C8—C9—C1257.2 (3)C21—C19—C20—F1A−137.1 (4)
C7—C8—C9—C12−124.7 (3)C18—C19—C20—F1A42.6 (5)
C13—C8—C9—C11−61.3 (3)C21—C19—C20—F1B162.7 (10)
C7—C8—C9—C11116.7 (3)C18—C19—C20—F1B−17.6 (11)
C7—C8—C13—C14−1.6 (3)C21—C19—C20—F2A−18.8 (5)
C9—C8—C13—C14176.5 (2)C18—C19—C20—F2A160.9 (4)
C8—C13—C14—C1−0.1 (3)C18—C19—C21—C22−1.2 (4)
C8—C13—C14—C15−179.8 (2)C20—C19—C21—C22178.5 (2)
O1—C1—C14—C13−177.42 (18)C19—C21—C22—C230.8 (4)
C2—C1—C14—C131.9 (3)C21—C22—C23—C17−0.1 (4)
O1—C1—C14—C152.3 (3)C18—C17—C23—C22−0.2 (3)
C2—C1—C14—C15−178.41 (18)C16—C17—C23—C22−177.6 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1···N10.92 (3)1.73 (3)2.587 (2)154 (3)
C16—H16B···Cg2i0.972.773.705 (3)162
C21—H21···Cg1ii0.932.853.631 (3)143
  6 in total

1.  Crystal structure, spectroscopy, and quantum chemical studies of (E)-2-[(2-chlorophenyl)iminomethyl]-4-trifluoromethoxyphenol.

Authors:  Hasan Tanak
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 2.781

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Experimental and quantum chemical calculational studies on 2-[(4-Fluorophenylimino)methyl]-3,5-dimethoxyphenol.

Authors:  Hasan Tanak; Ayşen Ağar; Metin Yavuz
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 1.810

4.  2-[(2,4-Dimethyl-phen-yl)imino-meth-yl]-6-methyl-phenol.

Authors:  Hasan Tanak; Ferda Erşahin; Erbil Ağar; Metin Yavuz; Orhan Büyükgüngör
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-08-29

5.  (E)-2-[3-(Trifluoro-meth-yl)phenyl-imino-meth-yl]benzene-1,4-diol.

Authors:  Zarife Sibel Sahin; Sümeyye Gümüş; Mustafa Macit; Samil Işık
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-10-17

6.  2,4-Di-tert-butyl-6-[(2,5-difluorophenyl)iminomethyl]phenol.

Authors:  Omer Celik; Veli T Kasumov; Ertan Sahin
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-10-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.