Literature DB >> 32431448

A Comparison of User Behaviors for a Fertility-Tracking App: Does Training in an NFP Method Improve Persistence and Use?

Michael D Manhart1.   

Abstract

This study explores differences in the use of CycleProGo™ (CPG), a fertility-tracking app developed by Couple to Couple League (CCL), between those exposed to it as a part of natural family planning (NFP) instruction versus those who find it on their own. An anonymous data set of 17,543 CPG accounts opened between April 2013 and June 2016 was used for analysis. Nonmember users opened the most accounts (58 percent, n = 10,134), CCL members represented 38 percent (n = 6,758) of new accounts, and 207 CCL teachers (4 percent) were using CPG for personal charting. Significantly more nonmember accounts had zero days of use after the initial opening compared to CCL member accounts (61 percent vs. 23 percent, respectively, χ2 = 2,405.9, p < .001). Conversely, significantly more CCL member accounts were used for ninety days or longer than nonmember accounts (47 percent vs. 13 percent, respectively, χ2 = 2,404.2, p < .001). CCL students-those who began using the app as part of a formal NFP teaching curriculum-were more likely to use the app for > six cycles compared to nonmembers. In accounts with at least one complete cycle, CCL students were the most diligent at daily recording (95 percent of cycle days with observation recorded) followed by CCL members (88 percent) and nonmembers (76 percent). CCL teachers had the lowest frequency of cycle days with a recorded observation (73 percent). Within each cohort, accounts with > six recorded cycles had a lower proportion of cycle days with an observation recorded, likely reflecting increasing knowledge of their personal fertility patterns. Long-term users who had no known formal training in NFP still had the lowest proportion cycle days with a fertility observation. We conclude formal NFP instruction increases the probability of long-term app use, and regardless of training, long-term users will likely record observations on about 70 percent of cycle days.
SUMMARY: "CycleProGo™ users with NFP training were more persistent and diligent about daily data input than those without training." © Catholic Medical Association 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fertility awareness; Fertility awareness information technology; NFP; Natural fertility care; Persistence with app use; Women’s reproductive health

Year:  2019        PMID: 32431448      PMCID: PMC7016424          DOI: 10.1177/0024363919870435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Linacre Q        ISSN: 0024-3639


  9 in total

1.  The Performance of Fertility Awareness-based Method Apps Marketed to Avoid Pregnancy.

Authors:  Marguerite Duane; Alison Contreras; Elizabeth T Jensen; Amina White
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.657

2.  Natural Family Planning Instruction as a Marriage Requirement a Retrospective Analysis of the First Two Years' Experience in the Diocese of Covington.

Authors:  Michael D Manhart
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2012-11-01

3.  Evaluation of Smartphone Menstrual Cycle Tracking Applications Using an Adapted APPLICATIONS Scoring System.

Authors:  Michelle L Moglia; Henry V Nguyen; Kathy Chyjek; Katherine T Chen; Paula M Castaño
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  The effectiveness of a fertility awareness based method to avoid pregnancy in relation to a couple's sexual behaviour during the fertile time: a prospective longitudinal study.

Authors:  P Frank-Herrmann; J Heil; C Gnoth; E Toledo; S Baur; C Pyper; E Jenetzky; T Strowitzki; G Freundl
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Randomized comparison of two Internet-supported fertility-awareness-based methods of family planning.

Authors:  Richard J Fehring; Mary Schneider; Kathleen Raviele; Dana Rodriguez; Jessica Pruszynski
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Perfect-use and typical-use Pearl Index of a contraceptive mobile app.

Authors:  E Berglund Scherwitzl; O Lundberg; H Kopp Kallner; K Gemzell Danielsson; J Trussell; R Scherwitzl
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Plausibility of Menstrual Cycle Apps Claiming to Support Conception.

Authors:  Alexander Freis; Tanja Freundl-Schütt; Lisa-Maria Wallwiener; Sigfried Baur; Thomas Strowitzki; Günter Freundl; Petra Frank-Herrmann
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-04-03

8.  Lessons From the Dot Contraceptive Efficacy Study: Analysis of the Use of Agile Development to Improve Recruitment and Enrollment for mHealth Research.

Authors:  Liya T Haile; Rebecca G Simmons; Dominick Shattuck
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 4.773

9.  billingsMentor: Adapting natural family planning to information technology and relieving the user of unnecessary tasks.

Authors:  Audrey D Smith; John L Smith
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2014-08
  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Menstrual Cycle Tracking Applications and the Potential for Epidemiological Research: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Joelle S Schantz; Claudia S P Fernandez; Z Jukic Anne Marie
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2021-02-20
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.