| Literature DB >> 32430086 |
Dandan Sun1, Dongliang Yang2, Yafen Li1, Jie Zhou1, Wenqing Wang1, Quanliang Wang1, Nan Lin1, Ailin Cao1, Haichen Wang3, Qingyun Zhang1.
Abstract
The first case of 2019-nCoV pneumonia infection occurred in Wuhan, Hubei Province, South China Seafood Market in December 2019. As a group with a high probability of infection, health workers are faced with a certain degree of psychological challenges in the process of facing the epidemic. This study attempts to evaluate the impact of 2019-nCoV outbreak on the psychological state of Chinese health workers and to explore the influencing factors. During the period from 31 January 2020 to 4 February 2020, the 'Questionnaire Star' electronic questionnaire system was used to collect data. The 2019-nCoV impact questionnaire and The Impact of Event Scale (IES) were used to check the psychological status of health workers in China. A total of 442 valid data were collected in this study. Seventy-four (16.7%) male and 368 (83.3%) female individuals participated in this study. The average score of high arousal dimension was 5.15 (s.d. = 4.71), and the median score was 4.0 (IQR 2.0, 7.0). The average score of IES was 15.26 (s.d. = 11.23), and the median score was 13.5 (IQR 7.0, 21.0). Multiple regression analysis showed that there were critical statistical differences in high arousal scores among different gender groups (male 3.0 vs. female 5.0, P = 0.075). Whether being quarantined had significant statistical differences of IES scores (being quarantined 16.0 vs. not being quarantined 13.0, P = 0.021). The overall impact of the 2019-nCoV outbreak on health workers is at a mild level. Chinese health workers have good psychological coping ability in the face of public health emergencies.Entities:
Keywords: 2019 Novel coronavirus; COVID-19; health workers; psychological
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32430086 PMCID: PMC7251284 DOI: 10.1017/S0950268820001090
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Epidemiol Infect ISSN: 0950-2688 Impact factor: 2.451
Comparison of IES and high arousal scores among different groups of health workers
| Item | Score of IES, median (IQR) | Score of high arousal, median (IQR) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hospital level | 0.123 | 0.102 | |||
| Grade 3A hospital | 369 (83.5) | 13.0 (7.0, 21.0) | 4.0 (1.0, 7.0) | ||
| Tertiary hospital | 26 (5.9) | 12.0 (6.5, 15.0) | 5.0 (2.25,5.75) | ||
| Secondary hospital | 30 (6.8) | 13.5 (6.5, 18.25) | 5.0 (1.0, 7.0) | ||
| Primary hospital | 13 (2.9) | 20.0 (15.0, 25.0) | 6.0 (4.0, 8.0) | ||
| Others | 4 (0.9) | 8.5 (7.25, 10.5) | 13.5 (12.5, 15.25) | ||
| Type of medical institution | 0.364 | 0.451 | |||
| Public hospital | 427 (96.6) | 13.0 (7.0, 21.0) | 4.0 (2.0, 7.0) | ||
| Non-public hospital | 15 (3.4) | 17.0 (10.0, 22.5) | 4.0 (0.5, 6.0) | ||
| Hospital type | 0.301 | 0.366 | |||
| General hospital | 396 (89.6) | 13.0 (7.0, 21.0) | 4.0 (1.75, 7.0) | ||
| Traditional Chinese medicine hospital | 15 (3.4) | 11.0(6.0,14.5) | 3.0 (0.0, 6.0) | ||
| Integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine hospital | 5 (1.1) | 19.0 (16.0,26.0) | 10.0 (5.0, 13.0) | ||
| Specialist hospital | 24 (5.4) | 15.0 (5.0, 23.0) | 4.5 (2.0, 8.0) | ||
| Others | 2 (0.5) | 5.0 (4.0, 6.0) | 7.5 (6.25, 8.5) | ||
| Age | 0.018 | 0.016 | |||
| ⩽25 | 36 (8.1) | 11.0 (7.75, 26.0) | 3.0(2.0, 7.25) | ||
| 26–35 | 261 (59.0) | 14.0 (7.0, 21.0) | 4.0 (2.0, 7.0) | ||
| 36–45 | 114 (25.8) | 12.0 (6.25, 17.0) | 4.0 (1.0, 6.0) | ||
| 46–55 | 28 (6.3) | 19.5 (14.5, 26.0) | 7.0 (4.75, 9.5) | ||
| ⩾56 | 3 (0.7) | 29.0 (16.5, 32.5) | 5.0 (4.5, 7.5) | ||
| Gender | 0.873 | 0.077 | |||
| Male | 74 (16.7) | 13.5 (8.0, 18.0) | 3.0 (1.0, 5.75) | ||
| Female | 368 (83.3) | 13.5 (7.0, 22.0) | 5.0 (2.0, 7.0) | ||
| Job title | 0.159 | 0.156 | |||
| Doctors | 53 (12.0) | 16.0 (11.0, 22.0) | 5.0 (3.0, 8.0) | ||
| Nursing staff | 348 (78.7) | 13.0 (7.0, 20.25) | 4.0 (1.0, 7.0) | ||
| Administrative and logistics staff | 18 (4.1) | 13.0 (6.25, 26.5) | 5.0 (1.25, 9.0) | ||
| Others | 23 (5.2) | 15.0 (5.5, 18.0) | 6.0 (2.5, 7.5) | ||
| Working years | 0.162 | 0.379 | |||
| <3 | 75 (17.0) | 11.0 (7.0, 19.0) | 3.0 (2.0, 7.0) | ||
| 3–5 | 66 (14.9) | 15.0 (9.0, 22.75) | 5.0 (2.0, 8.0) | ||
| 6–8 | 61 (13.8) | 16.0 (9.0, 23.0) | 5.0 (2.0, 7.0) | ||
| ⩾9 | 240 (54.3) | 13.0 (6.75, 19.0) | 4.0 (1.0, 7.0) | ||
| Marital status | 0.738 | 0.560 | |||
| Unmarried | 94 (21.3) | 11.5 (7.0, 18.75) | 3.5 (1.0, 7.0) | ||
| Married | 339 (76.7) | 14.0 (7.0, 21.0) | 4.0 (2.0, 7.0) | ||
| Divorced | 9 (2.0) | 16.0 (5.0, 34.0) | 5.0 (1.0, 12.0) | ||
| Number of children | 0.330 | 0.136 | |||
| 0 | 137 (31.0) | 12.0 (7.0, 23.0) | 4.0 (2.0, 7.0) | ||
| 1 | 203 (45.9) | 15.0 (8.0, 22.0) | 5.0 (2.0, 7.0) | ||
| 2 | 98 (22.2) | 12.0 (6.0, 19.0) | 4.0 (1.0, 6.0) | ||
| ⩾3 | 4 (0.9) | 16.0 (12.0, 19.0) | 5.0 (3.5, 6.75) | ||
| Living conditions | 0.915 | 0.581 | |||
| Living with family members | 377 (85.3) | 14.0 (7.0, 21.0) | 4.0 (2.0, 7.0) | ||
| Dormitory | 27 (6.1) | 11.0 (8.5, 17.5) | 3.0 (1.0, 6.0) | ||
| Living alone | 38 (8.6) | 11.0 (7.0, 22.0) | 4.0 (2.0, 6.75) | ||
| Whether contact with 2019-nCov confirmed patients | 0.327 | 0.303 | |||
| Yes | 70 (15.8) | 15.0 (8.25, 22.0) | 5.0 (2.0, 7.0) | ||
| No | 372 (84.2) | 13.0 (7.0, 20.0) | 4.0 (1.0, 7.0) | ||
| Whether contact with suspected 2019-nCov patients | 0.273 | 0.279 | |||
| Yes | 161 (36.4) | 14.0 (8.0, 22.0) | 5.0 (2.0, 7.0) | ||
| No | 281 (63.6) | 13.0 (7.0, 19.0) | 4.0 (1.0, 7.0) | ||
| Whether being quarantined | 0.042 | 0.068 | |||
| Yes | 29 (6.6) | 16.0 (11.0, 27.0) | 6.0 (3.0, 9.0) | ||
| No | 413 (93.4) | 13.0 (7.0, 20.0) | 4.0 (1.0, 7.0) | ||
| Whether participated in SARS treatment in 2003 | 0.133 | 0.153 | |||
| Yes | 28 (6.3) | 16.0 (7.75, 25.25) | 6.0 (2.0, 8.25) | ||
| No | 414 (93.7) | 13.0 (7.0, 20.0) | 4.0 (1.0, 7.0) |
Impact of 2019-nCoV outbreak on health workers in China (n = 442)
| Item | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|
| 1. My work puts me at great risk. | 395 | 89.4 |
| 2. I feel more pressure at work than before. | 381 | 86.2 |
| 3. I can accept the risk of exposure to or care for patients with the 2019-nCoV. | 361 | 81.7 |
| 4. I am afraid of being infected with the 2019-nCoV. | 334 | 75.6 |
| 5. I can ensure that my protective measures are effective enough. | 207 | 46.8 |
| 6. If I am infected with the 2019-nCoV, I am confident that I can recover. | 336 | 76.0 |
| 7. The 2019-nCoV outbreak makes me feel the urge to resign. | 52 | 11.8 |
| 8. Because of working in the hospital, my family or friends are worried that they might get infected through me. | 280 | 63.3 |
| 9. People stay away from me because of the nature of my work. | 144 | 32.6 |
Multiple linear regression with high arousal score as dependent variable
| Variables and intercept | Std error | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 5.365 | 2.174 | 2.467 | 0.014 |
| Age | 0.106 | 0.304 | 0.349 | 0.727 |
| Quarantined | −1.431 | 0.904 | −1.583 | 0.114 |
| Gender | 1.229 | 0.689 | 1.785 | 0.075 |
Univariate analysis of the scores of each dimension of IES and whether being quarantined
| Items | Avoidance | Intrude | High arousal | IES |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quarantined | 9.0 (4.0,14.0) | 10.0 (5.0,13.0) | 6.0 (3.0,9.0) | 16.0 (11.0,27.0) |
| Not being quarantined | 6.0 (3.0,9.0) | 8.0 (6.0,10.0) | 4.0 (1.0,7.0) | 13.0 (7.0,20.0) |
| −2.674 | −1.282 | −1.826 | −2.033 | |
| 0.008 | 0.200 | 0.068 | 0.042 |
Multiple linear regression with IES score as the dependent variable
| Variables and intercept | Std error | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 24.717 | 4.484 | 5.513 | <0.001 |
| Age | 0.060 | 0.718 | 0.084 | 0.933 |
| Quarantined | −4.958 | 2.149 | −2.307 | 0.021 |