| Literature DB >> 32430020 |
Katarina Butorac1, Martina Banić1, Jasna Novak1, Andreja Leboš Pavunc1, Ksenija Uroić1, Ksenija Durgo2, Nada Oršolić3, Marina Kukolj3, Slobodanka Radović4, Simone Scalabrin4, Jurica Žučko5, Antonio Starčević5, Jagoda Šušković1, Blaženka Kos6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the functional capacity of plantaricin-producing Lactobacillus plantarum SF9C and S-layer-carrying Lactobacillus brevis SF9B to withstand gastrointestinal transit and to compete among the gut microbiota in vivo. Considering the probiotic potential of Lb. brevis SF9B, this study aims to investigate the antibacterial activity of Lb. plantarum SF9C and their potential for in vivo colonisation in rats, which could be the basis for the investigation of their synergistic functionality.Entities:
Keywords: Antibacterial activity; Gut colonisation; Lactobacillus; Microbiota; Plantaricin; S-layer
Year: 2020 PMID: 32430020 PMCID: PMC7236188 DOI: 10.1186/s12934-020-01365-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Cell Fact ISSN: 1475-2859 Impact factor: 5.328
Fig. 1Distribution of Lb. plantarum SF9C subsystem gene functions. The complete genome sequence of Lb. plantarum SF9C was annotated using the RAST server. The pie chart shows the count of each subsystem feature and the subsystem coverage
Fig. 2Hierarchical clustering of multiple Lactobacillus genomes based on single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) frequency. SNP frequency is “number of bases divided by bases aligned”. Origins and resources of the respected strains: WCFS1 [29], NC8 [4], RI-113 [28], B21 [23], BDGP2 [49], SF15C, SF9C, SF15B and SF9B [8], ATCC367 [36] and NCFM [1]
Fig. 3Genetic map of the plantaricin gene cluster of Lb. plantarum SF9C strain
Fig. 43D structures of PlnJK and PlnEF plantaricin peptides of SF9C strain predicted by the homology modelling and their helical wheel projections analysed by HeliQuest. aa—the amino acid residues (the one-letter code for amino acids is used); yellow—hydrophobic residues; purple—serine and threonine residues; dark blue—basic residues; red—acidic residues, pink—asparagine and glutamine residues; grey—alanine and glycine residues, light blue—histidine residues; green—proline residues; H—hydrophobicity; μH—hydrophobic moment; z—net charge (calculated at pH = 7.4, under the assumption that histidine is neutral and that the N-terminal amino group and the C-terminal carboxyl group of the sequence are uncharged)
Inhibition of Listeria monocytogenes ATCC 19111™, Staphylococcus aureus 3048, Escherichia coli 3014 and Salmonella Typhimurium FP1 by grown cultures of Lb. plantarum SF9C and Lb. brevis SF9B, separately and combined, evaluated by agar spot-test method and expressed as the diameter of inhibition zones around the grown cultures (cm)
| Diameter of inhibition zone (cm) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.50 ± 0.10az | 3.32 ± 0.13azx | 3.05 ± 0.05ay | 3.07 ± 0.06ayx | |
| 1.93 ± 0.40bz | 1.35 ± 0.05by | 1.75 ± 0.31bzy | 1.52 ± 0.08bzy | |
| Combined SF9C + SF9B | 2.57 ± 0.06bz | 1.50 ± 0.10bx | 2.17 ± 0.06by | 2.60 ± 0.10cz |
abcDifferent letter means statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) within the same column among the used Lactobacillus strains
xyzDifferent letter means statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) within the same row among the used pathogens. Statistical analysis was carried out using ANOVA and the results are reported as mean value ± SD of three independent experiments
Comparison of the antimicrobial activity of cell-free supernatants (CFSs) of Lb. plantarum SF9C and Lb. brevis SF9B, separately and combined, before and after the treatment with proteinase K and high temperature heating, against L. monocytogenes ATCC® 19111™, S. aureus 3048, E. coli 3014 and S. Typhimurium FP1, determined by agar well-diffusion assay and expressed as the diameter of inhibition zones around the wells (cm)
| Treatment of CFS | Diameter of inhibition zone (cm) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | 1.92 ± 0.03az | 1.57 ± 0.06ay | 1.50 ± 0.05ayw | 1.38 ± 0.03aw | |
| 0.00 ± 0.00ez | 0.00 ± 0.00ez | 0.00 ± 0.00ez | 0.00 ± 0.00fz | ||
| Combined SF9C + SF9B | 1.72 ± 0.03bz | 0.98 ± 0.03dx | 1.13 ± 0.06cy | 1.00 ± 0.00cx | |
| proteinase K | 1.10 ± 0.00dy | 1.17 ± 0.03cyz | 1.23 ± 0.03bz | 1.20 ± 0.00bxz | |
| 0.00 ± 0.00ez | 0.00 ± 0.00ez | 0.00 ± 0.00ez | 0.00 ± 0.00fz | ||
| Combined SF9C + SF9B | 1.02 ± 0.03dz | 0.90 ± 0.00dy | 0.98 ± 0.03dz | 0.85 ± 0.00ey | |
| 100 °C/30 min | 1.68 ± 0.03bz | 1.52 ± 0.03by | 1.30 ± 0.00bx | 1.23 ± 0.03bx | |
| 0.00 ± 0.00ez | 0.00 ± 0.00ez | 0.00 ± 0.00ez | 0.00 ± 0.00fz | ||
| Combined SF9C + SF9B | 1.53 ± 0.06cz | 0.93 ± 0.06dx | 1.03 ± 0.06cdy | 0.92 ± 0.03dx | |
abcdefDifferent letter means statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) within the same column among the treatments of CFSs and used Lactobacillus strains
wxyzDifferent letter means statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) within the same row among the used pathogens. Statistical analysis was carried out using ANOVA and the results are reported as mean value ± SD of three independent experiments
Fig. 5The growth curves of the test microorganisms: a) S. aureus 3048 and b) L. monocytogenes ATCC® 19111™ during cocultivation with (···) or without (▬ ▬) Lb. plantarum SF9C. Growth curve of Lb. plantarum SF9C (▬)
Fig. 6a The four most abundant phyla detected in the faecal microbiota of control and AlCl3-exposed rats, both fed with Lb. plantarum SF9C and Lb. brevis SF9B. b The distribution of the bacterial classes in the faeces of control (C) and AlCl3-exposed rats (A), before application (0), and on the 3rd day (1), and 10th day (2) after the application of SF9B and SF9C strains. The second number represents the ordinal number of the rat
Fig. 7PCR-DGGE analysis of 16S DNA fragments generated with the universal bacterial primers HDA1 and HDA2 from the pooled DNA samples of the Lactobacillus species, isolated on MRS agar from faecal samples of rats fed with Lb. plantarum SF9C and Lb. brevis SF9B. Lanes: C—before application of SF9C and SF9B strains; day 3—3rd day after the application of SF9C and SF9B strains; day 10—10th day after application of SF9C and SF9B strains, S—the ladder of sequences from the pure cultures of SF9C and SF9B strains, respectively. Bands indicated by the symbols were excised and after amplification sequenced
Bacterial strains used in this study
| Bacterial strain | Cultivation conditions | References |
|---|---|---|
| MRS, 37 °C, microaerophilic | Banić et al. [ | |
| MRS, 37 °C, microaerophilic | This study | |
| BHI broth, 37 °C, aerobic | CIM-FFTB | |
| BHI broth, 37 °C, aerobic | CIM-FFTB | |
| BHI broth, 37 °C, aerobic | ATCC | |
| BHI broth, 37 °C, aerobic | CIM-FFTB |
CIM-FFTB—Culture collection of the Laboratory for Antibiotic, Enzyme, Probiotic and Starter Culture Technologies, Faculty of Food Technology and Biotechnology, University of Zagreb
ATCC American Type Culture Collection
PCR primers used for the amplification of the plantaricin-related genes
| Target gene | Bacteriocin | Forward primer (5′–3′) | Reverse primer (5′–3′) | Amplicon size (bp) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plantaricin A | GTACAGTACTAATGGGAG | CTTACGCCAATCTATACG | 450 | Ben Omar et al. [ | |
| Plantaricin EF | GGCATAGTTAAAATTCCCCCC | CAGGTTGCCGCAAAAAAAG | 428 | Ben Omar et al. [ | |
| Plantaricin J | TAACGACGGATTGCTCTG | AATCAAGGAATTATCACATTAGTC | 475 | Ben Omar et al. [ | |
| Plantaricin NC8 | GGTCTGCGTATAAGCATCGC | AAATTGAACATATGGGTGCTTTAAATTC | 207 | Maldonado et al. [ | |
| Plantaricin S | GCCTTACCAGCGTAATGCCC | CTGGTGATGCAATCGTTAGTTT | 320 | Ben Omar et al. [ | |
| Plantaricin W | TCACACGAAATATTCCA | GGCAAGCGTAAGAAATAAATGAG | 165 | Holo et al. [ |