| Literature DB >> 32429055 |
Jinlong Wang1,2, Xusheng Li1,2, Jianxiao Song1,2, Kunze Wu1,2, Yichun Xue1,2, Yiting Wu1,2, Shuangfei Wang1,2.
Abstract
Separating the fibers, deconstructing both the interlamellar structures and the intermicrofibrils structures in the cell wall, and cleaving the amorphous regions of cellulose (all reached in one bath chemical-assisted treatment), then extracting cellulose nanofibers (CNFs) from biomass, is both challenging and imperative. A simple, cost-effective and green strategy for extracting CNFs from bamboo using nitric acid and hydrogen peroxide (NCHP), to enable fibrillation via a cooperative mechanism, is demonstrated herein. NCHP-CNFs 13.1 ± 2.0 nm wide, with a high aspect ratio, 74% crystallinity, excellent UV resistance and high thermal stability, were successfully extracted by treatment in HNO3 aqueous solution, at a concentration of 3.2 mol/L, and treatment with 60.00 mmol/g H2O2 at 50 °C for 48 h. The yields of NCHP-CNFs reached 73% and 99% based on biomass and cellulose, respectively, due to the high delignification selectivity of OH+ and the mild aqueous conditions during the NCHP treatment. These NCHP-CNFs with excellent UV resistance can potentially be applied in the field of UV-resistant coatings, to replace organic and inorganic materials.Entities:
Keywords: biomass; cellulose nanofibers; hydrogen peroxide; nitric acid
Year: 2020 PMID: 32429055 PMCID: PMC7279225 DOI: 10.3390/nano10050943
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the extraction of cellulose nanofibers (CNF) from bamboo, by nitric acid and hydrogen peroxide (NCHP) treatment.
Figure 2Proposed mechanism of pretreatment.
The conditions of bamboo chemical pre-treatment with NCHP as well as the yield, chemical component ratio, removal ratio.
| S.N. | Treatment Condition (h/°C) | Nitric Acid Concentration (mol/L) | Hydrogen Peroxide (mmol/g) | Yield wt (%) | Lignin Content (%) | Lignin Removal (%) | Cellulose Content (%) | Cellulose Retention (%) | Hemicellulose Content (%) | Hemicellulose Removal (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 48/50 | 9.6 | 60.00 | 23.47 | 0.37 | 99.01 | 80.99 | 39.56 | 18.64 | 84.85 |
| 2 | 48/50 | 3.2 | 60.00 | 58.72 | 9.65 | 74.14 | 79.34 | 96.96 | 11.01 | 77.61 |
| 3 | 72/50 | 3.2 | 60.00 | 53.13 | 5.43 | 85.45 | 82.86 | 91.62 | 11.71 | 78.46 |
| 4 | 48/50 | 3.2 | 90.00 | 56.01 | 7.91 | 78.80 | 78.68 | 95.45 | 13.41 | 73.99 |
| 5 | 48/65 | 3.2 | 60.00 | 48.61 | 5.81 | 84.43 | 86.11 | 87.11 | 8.08 | 86.40 |
| 6 | 48/35 | 3.2 | 60.00 | 73.44 | 12.88 | 65.48 | 65.33 | 99.85 | 21.79 | 44.59 |
Figure 3SEM image of the morphology of the fibers after NCHP treatment for different times: (a) bamboo powder; (b) 12 h; (c) 24 h; and (d) 48 h.
Figure 4(a) TEM image of the NCHP-CNFs; (b) diameter distribution of the NCHP-CNFs.
Figure 5FTIR spectra of the untreated bamboo powder fiber and the NCHP-CNFs.
Figure 6XRD patterns of the bamboo powder fiber and the NCHP-CNFs.
Figure 7TGA curve and derivative curve of the bamboo powder fiber and the NCHP-CNFs.