Literature DB >> 32428420

BI-RADS Category 3 Is a Safe and Effective Alternative to Biopsy or Surgical Excision.

Linda Moy1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2020        PMID： 32428420      PMCID： PMC7325700          DOI： 10.1148/radiol.2020201583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN： 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  The National Mammography Database: Preliminary Data.

Authors:  Cindy S Lee; Mythreyi Bhargavan-Chatfield; Elizabeth S Burnside; Paul Nagy; Edward A Sickles
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Surveillance mammography and stereotactic core breast biopsy for probably benign lesions: a cost comparison analysis.

Authors:  R J Brenner; E A Sickles
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Cancer Yield and Patterns of Follow-up for BI-RADS Category 3 after Screening Mammography Recall in the National Mammography Database.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; Jeremy M Berg; Edward A Sickles; Elizabeth S Burnside; Margarita L Zuley; Robert D Rosenberg; Cindy S Lee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Breast cancer yield for screening mammographic examinations with recommendation for short-interval follow-up.

Authors:  Karla Kerlikowske; Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Linn A Abraham; Constance D Lehman; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; William E Barlow; Jennifer H Voeks; Berta M Geller; Patricia A Carney; Edward A Sickles
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3,184 consecutive cases.

Authors:  E A Sickles
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Use of BI-RADS 3-probably benign category in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial.

Authors:  Janet K Baum; Lucy G Hanna; Suddhasatta Acharyya; Mary C Mahoney; Emily F Conant; Lawrence W Bassett; Etta D Pisano
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Recommendation for short-interval follow-up examinations after a probably benign assessment: is clinical practice consistent with BI-RADS guidance?

Authors:  Erin J Aiello Bowles; Edward A Sickles; Diana L Miglioretti; Patricia A Carney; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.959
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.