Literature DB >> 32427557

Cancer Yield and Patterns of Follow-up for BI-RADS Category 3 after Screening Mammography Recall in the National Mammography Database.

Wendie A Berg1,2, Jeremy M Berg1,2, Edward A Sickles1,2, Elizabeth S Burnside1,2, Margarita L Zuley1,2, Robert D Rosenberg1,2, Cindy S Lee1,2.   

Abstract

Background The literature supports the use of short-interval follow-up as an alternative to biopsy for lesions assessed as probably benign, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 3, with an expected malignancy rate of less than 2%. Purpose To assess outcomes from 6-, 12-, and 24-month follow-up of probably benign findings first identified at recall from screening mammography in the National Mammography Database (NMD). Materials and Methods This retrospective study included women recalled from screening mammography with BI-RADS category 3 assessment at additional evaluation from January 2009 through March 2018 from 471 NMD facilities. Only the first BI-RADS category 3 occurrence for women aged 25 years or older with no personal history of breast cancer was analyzed, with biopsy or 2-year imaging follow-up. Cancer yield and positive predictive value of biopsies performed (PPV3) were determined at each follow-up. Results Among 45 202 women (median age, 55 years; range, 25-90 years) with a BI-RADS category 3 lesion, 1574 (3.5%) underwent biopsy at the time of lesion detection, yielding 72 cancers (cancer yield, 4.6%; 72 of 1574 women). For the remaining 43 628 women who accepted surveillance, 922 were seen within 90 days (with 78 lesions biopsied and 12 [15%] classified as malignant). The women still in surveillance (31 465 of 43 381 women [72.5%]) underwent follow-up mammography at 6 months. Of 3001 (9.5%) lesions biopsied, 456 (15.2%) were malignant (cancer yield, 1.5%; 456 of 31 465 women; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3%, 1.6%). Among 18 748 of 25 997 women (72.1%) in surveillance who underwent follow-up at 12 months, 1219 (6.5%) underwent biopsy with 230 (18.9%) malignant lesions found (cancer yield, 1.2%; 230 of 18 748 women; 95% CI: 1.1%, 1.4%). Through 2-year follow-up, the biopsy rate was 11.2% (4894 of 43 628 women) with a cancer yield of 1.86% (810 malignancies found among 43 628 women; 95% CI: 1.73%, 1.98%) and a PPV3 of 16.6% (810 malignancies found among 4894 women). Conclusion In the National Mammography Database, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 3 use is appropriate, with 1.86% cumulative cancer yield through 2-year follow-up. Of 810 malignancies, 468 (57.8%) were diagnosed at or before 6 months, validating necessity of short-interval follow-up of mammographic BI-RADS category 3 findings. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Moy in this issue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32427557     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020192641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  4 in total

1.  BI-RADS Category 3 Is a Safe and Effective Alternative to Biopsy or Surgical Excision.

Authors:  Linda Moy
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Value of BI-RADS 3 Audits.

Authors:  Prithwijit Roychowdhury; Gopal R Vijayaraghavan; John Roubil; Imani M Williams; Efaza Siddiqui; Srinivasan Vedantham
Journal:  Biomed J Sci Tech Res       Date:  2022-02-14

Review 3.  BI-RADS 3 on Screening Breast Ultrasound: What Is It and What Is the Appropriate Management?

Authors:  Wendie A Berg
Journal:  J Breast Imaging       Date:  2021-08-15

4.  A Comprehensive Model for Diagnosis of Primary Breast Lymphoma Differentiated From Breast Cancer and Prognosis Evaluation of Surgical Treatment.

Authors:  Yanan Li; Yan Zhang; Wei Wang; Chong Wei; Danqing Zhao; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 5.738

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.