Literature DB >> 32427351

Can custom 3D printed implants successfully reconstruct massive acetabular defects? A 3D-CT assessment.

Matthieu Durand-Hill1, Johann Henckel2, Anna Di Laura1, Alister J Hart1,2.   

Abstract

We report on the accuracy, measured with three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) postoperatively, in positioning custom 3D printed titanium components in patients with large acetabular defects. Twenty patients (13 females and 7 males) received custom-made acetabular implants between 2016 and 2018; the mean age was 66 years (SD = 11.6) and their mean body mass index was 28 (SD = 6.1). The median time to follow up was 25.5 months, range: 12 to 40 months. We describe a comparison method that uses the 3D models of CT-generated preoperative plans and the postoperative CT scans to quantify the discrepancy between planned and achieved component positions. Our primary outcome measures were the 3D-CT-measured difference between planned and achieved a component position in six degrees of freedom: center of rotation (CoR), component rotation, inclination (INC), and version (VER) of the cup. Our secondary outcome measures were: Oxford hip score, walking status, and complication rate. All components (100%) were positioned within 10 mm of planned CoR (in the three planes). Eighteen (95%) components were not rotated by more than 10° compared to the plan. Eleven (58%) components were positioned within 5° of planned cup angle (INC and VER). To date one complication has occurred, a periprosthetic fracture. This is the largest study in which postoperative 3D-CT measurements and clinical outcomes of custom-made acetabular components have been assessed. Accurate pre-op planning and the adoption of custom 3D printed implants show promising results in complex hip revision surgery.
© 2020 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computed tomography; custom 3D printed implants; image analysis for component orientation; paprosky acetabular defects; revision Hip surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32427351     DOI: 10.1002/jor.24752

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  7 in total

1.  Three dimensional printing as an aid for pre-operative planning in complex cases of total joint arthroplasty: A case series.

Authors:  Samuel Morgan; Juan Barriga; Solomon Dadia; Omri Merose; Amir Sternheim; Nimrod Snir
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-08-22

2.  Three-dimensional-printed titanium implants for severe acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty: short- and mid-term results.

Authors:  Sheng Fang; Yiming Wang; Peng Xu; Junke Zhu; Jinbo Liu; Huan Li; Xiaoliang Sun
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.479

3.  Custom Massive Allograft in a Case of Pelvic Bone Tumour: Simulation of Processing with Computerised Numerical Control vs. Robotic Machining.

Authors:  Leonardo Vivarelli; Marco Govoni; Dario Attala; Carmine Zoccali; Roberto Biagini; Dante Dallari
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-15       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Functional and radiological outcomes after treatment with custom-made acetabular components in patients with Paprosky type 3 acetabular defects: short-term results.

Authors:  Michael S Gruber; Michael Jesenko; Julia Burghuber; Josef Hochreiter; Peter Ritschl; Reinhold Ortmaier
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Defining the canal for ischial and pubic screws in cup revision surgery.

Authors:  Steffen Brodt; Vincent Boersch; Patrick Strube; Georgi Wassilew; Georg Matziolis
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 3.479

Review 6.  Clinical and radiological outcomes in three-dimensional printing assisted revision total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Jiajun Lin; Fenyong Chen; Wenge Liu; Min Chen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Mechanical and Microstructural Anisotropy of Laser Powder Bed Fusion 316L Stainless Steel.

Authors:  Zdeněk Pitrmuc; Jan Šimota; Libor Beránek; Petr Mikeš; Vladislav Andronov; Jiří Sommer; František Holešovský
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 3.623

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.