Literature DB >> 32427281

Mixture and concentration effects on odorant receptor response patterns in vivo.

Timothy S McClintock1, Qiang Wang1, Tomoko Sengoku1, William B Titlow1, Patrick Breheny2.   

Abstract

Natural odors are mixtures of volatile chemicals (odorants). Odors are encoded as responses of distinct subsets of the hundreds of odorant receptors and trace amine-associated receptors expressed monogenically by olfactory sensory neurons. This is an elegantly simple mechanism for differentially encoding odors but it is susceptible to complex dose-response relationships and interactions between odorants at receptors, which may help explain olfactory phenomena such as mixture suppression, synthetic versus elemental odor processing, and poorly predictable perceptual outcomes of new odor mixtures. In this study in vivo tests in freely behaving mice confirm evidence of a characteristic receptor response pattern consisting of a few receptors with strong responses and a greater number of weakly responding receptors. Odorant receptors responsive to an odor are often unrelated and widely divergent in sequence, even when the odor consists of a single species of odorant. Odorant receptor response patterns to a citrus odor broaden with concentration. Some highly sensitive receptors respond only to a low concentration but others respond in proportion to concentration, a feature that may be critical for concentration-invariant perception. Other tests find evidence of interactions between odorants in vivo. All of the odorant receptor responses to a moderate concentration of the fecal malodor indole are suppressed by a high concentration of the floral odorant, α-ionone. Such suppressive effects are consistent with prior evidence that odorant interactions at individual odorant receptors are common.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  G-protein coupled receptor; Smell; citrus; malodor; sensory neuroscience

Year:  2020        PMID: 32427281     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjaa032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  7 in total

Review 1.  Position Review: Functional Selectivity in Mammalian Olfactory Receptors.

Authors:  Barry W Ache
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 2.  The Sniffing Kidney: Roles for Renal Olfactory Receptors in Health and Disease.

Authors:  Blythe D Shepard
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2021-04-19

3.  Encoding the Odor of Cigarette Smoke.

Authors:  Timothy S McClintock; Naazneen Khan; Yelena Alimova; Madeline Aulisio; Dong Y Han; Patrick Breheny
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Inhibitory signaling in mammalian olfactory transduction potentially mediated by Gαo.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Corey; Kirill Ukhanov; Yuriy V Bobkov; Jeremy C McIntyre; Jeffrey R Martens; Barry W Ache
Journal:  Mol Cell Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-25       Impact factor: 4.626

5.  Exploring the Characteristics of an Aroma-Blending Mixture by Investigating the Network of Shared Odors and the Molecular Features of Their Related Odorants.

Authors:  Anne Tromelin; Florian Koensgen; Karine Audouze; Elisabeth Guichard; Thierry Thomas-Danguin
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 6.  More than meets the AI: The possibilities and limits of machine learning in olfaction.

Authors:  Ann-Sophie Barwich; Elisabeth A Lloyd
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 5.152

7.  A physicochemical model of odor sampling.

Authors:  Mitchell E Gronowitz; Adam Liu; Qiang Qiu; C Ron Yu; Thomas A Cleland
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 4.475

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.