INTRODUCTION: Superior vena cava syndrome is one of the more serious complications of central venous catheter insertion. Drug interactions of administered drugs used in association with these catheters can lead to formation of precipitations and consequently thrombus formation. These interactions can be either anion-cation or acid-base based and more commonly present in clinical practice than expected. CASE PRESENTATION: The case of a 31-year old female who was admitted to an intensive care unit with an intracranial haemorrhage, is presented. Occlusion of the superior vena cava was caused by a drug-induced thrombus, formed by the precipitation and clotting of total parenteral nutrition and intravenous drugs. Given the nature of the thrombus and a recent intracranial haemorrhage, the patient was treated with a central thrombectomy supported by a heparin-free extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of drug interactions is crucial in order to heighten awareness for the dangers of concomitant drug administration, especially in combination with total parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients.
INTRODUCTION: Superior vena cava syndrome is one of the more serious complications of central venous catheter insertion. Drug interactions of administered drugs used in association with these catheters can lead to formation of precipitations and consequently thrombus formation. These interactions can be either anion-cation or acid-base based and more commonly present in clinical practice than expected. CASE PRESENTATION: The case of a 31-year old female who was admitted to an intensive care unit with an intracranial haemorrhage, is presented. Occlusion of the superior vena cava was caused by a drug-induced thrombus, formed by the precipitation and clotting of total parenteral nutrition and intravenous drugs. Given the nature of the thrombus and a recent intracranial haemorrhage, the patient was treated with a central thrombectomy supported by a heparin-free extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of drug interactions is crucial in order to heighten awareness for the dangers of concomitant drug administration, especially in combination with total parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients.
Central venous catheter (CVC) placement is increasingly routinely performed in-intensive care units (ICU), as well as outside ICUs, since the need for chemotherapy, total parenteral nutrition (TPN) and concomitant or long-term drug therapy has increased [1].An estimated 18% of patients in ICUs, receiving a subclavian CVC, experience adverse mechanical events, such as hematoma, pneumothorax and arterial puncture [2]. Superior vena cava (SVC) thrombosis is reported in 1.5 to 21% of patients in ICUs; however, this usually remains asymptomatic and only detected on venography or ultrasonography [2,3,4].A rare case of SVC syndrome, caused by a drug thrombus which required surgical thrombectomy is reported. A drug thrombus is defined as a thrombus predominantly consisting of an aggregation of chemicals or drugs. These aggregates are usually formed of chemical acid-base and anion-cation reactions [5,6].
SVC thrombosis remains one of the more severe complications following the insertion of a CVC. The patient in this report had a rare type of thrombus, presumably formed out of aggregates of TPN and one or several other administered drugs. These aggregates can be the result of chemical reactions such as anion-cation and acid-base reactions. Weak bases and acids are known to form soluble salts in both low and high pH environments.When mixed with a buffered substance, such as TPN, non-soluble precipitations can be produced. Most organic drugs are anions, which have the ability to interact with the hydronium ions found in TPN. Furthermore, bivalent anions are known to form poorly soluble salts with calcium [5,6].Therefore, numerous drugs have the potential to interact with each other, as well as components of TPN. Incompatibility reactions occur with midazolam, furosemide and cefazolin [8].Midazolam as well as furosemide were administered to the current patient which had the potential to form a drug thrombus.One type of precipitate occurs immediately, due to the poor mixing of the compounds; a second type within 24 to 48 hours due to crystal formation between calcium and bivalent bases [9].Temperature also plays an important role in the precipitation process. Higher temperatures cause more free calcium as well as bibasic salt formation, both with the potential to create interactions [5,9].Our patient experienced elevated body temperatures, which could have accelerated the process of anion-cation formation.Ultimately, it was presumed that several factors contributed to the drug thrombus formation. First of all, the concomitant administration of TPN and incompatible drugs, combined with an increased availability of precipitating components due to the elevated body temperature. Furthermore, it was hypothesized that a snowball effect was created because of reduced flow over the catheter by the initial aggregates which subsequently prolonged contact time of the different elements. This could have led to the rapid evolution of a total occlusion. In this case, pantoprazole, midazolam, amoxicillin, mannitol and furosemide all had the potential to form precipitates with TPN separately or in combination.TEE was the first diagnostic test used in the current case to detect the thrombus. This was later was confirmed via CT scan. Colour flow doppler ultrasound contributes to an increased detection rate of CVC related thrombi with a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 91% of total central vein occlusion [3,7,10,11].Diagnosis can be made indirectly by detection of thrombosis in the internal jugular vein or through flow voidance and nonpulsatile, non-phasic flow in the upper central veins [12, 13, 14]. Early detection is considered important because of the risk for pulmonary emboli when particles of the thrombus detach. Monreal et al. [15] found an incidence of pulmonary embolism related to CVC thrombi of 15%, of which 1 in 3 were symptomaticIn retrospect, the unusual Hounsfield density and configuration of the thrombus on CT scan also suggested its atypical nature and contributed to the diagnosis.Several treatment options exist as a treatment for SVC thrombus. Factor Xa inhibition is the first choice in stable patients with limited thrombus. Thrombolysis or interventional radiology guided clot retrieval can be considered in more unstable patients [15,16].Due to intracranial haemorrhage and necessity for anticoagulation, these options were not considered. Surgery frequently is a last resort when other treatment options are not feasible or fail [16].Additionally, it has been shown that once precipitates are formed, they are unlikely to dissolve on their own [9], ultimately supporting our decision to proceed to surgery.In the present case, a heparin-free ECMO circuit was used to provide hypothermic cardiac arrest and the necessary oxygenation to the brain. This method also minimized the need for heparinization as well as pathophysiologic stress. Muellenbach et al. [17] described a case series of heparin-free ECMO use in traumatic brain injury, with running times of up to 5 days without thromboembolic events.On the other hand, cardiopulmonary bypass was not considered an option, as it would have required an activated clotting times of at least 400 seconds.In conclusion, a unique case involving a rare type of thrombus resulting from the precipitation of concomitant drug therapy has been reported and described, which may contribute to heightened awareness with similar findings of SVC syndrome and thrombi resistant to anticoagulation.
Authors: Ralf M Muellenbach; Markus Kredel; Ekkehard Kunze; Peter Kranke; Julian Kuestermann; Alexander Brack; Armin Gorski; Christian Wunder; Norbert Roewer; Thomas Wurmb Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: L A Trissel; D L Gilbert; J F Martinez; M B Baker; W V Walter; J M Mirtallo Journal: Am J Health Syst Pharm Date: 1997-06-01 Impact factor: 2.637
Authors: J Merrer; B De Jonghe; F Golliot; J Y Lefrant; B Raffy; E Barre; J P Rigaud; D Casciani; B Misset; C Bosquet; H Outin; C Brun-Buisson; G Nitenberg Journal: JAMA Date: 2001-08-08 Impact factor: 56.272