Literature DB >> 32425220

A Bayesian Random Block Item Response Theory Model for Forced-Choice Formats.

HyeSun Lee1, Weldon Z Smith1.   

Abstract

Based on the framework of testlet models, the current study suggests the Bayesian random block item response theory (BRB IRT) model to fit forced-choice formats where an item block is composed of three or more items. To account for local dependence among items within a block, the BRB IRT model incorporated a random block effect into the response function and used a Markov Chain Monte Carlo procedure for simultaneous estimation of item and trait parameters. The simulation results demonstrated that the BRB IRT model performed well for the estimation of item and trait parameters and for screening those with relatively low scores on target traits. As found in the literature, the composition of item blocks was crucial for model performance; negatively keyed items were required for item blocks. The empirical application showed the performance of the BRB IRT model was equivalent to that of the Thurstonian IRT model. The potential advantage of the BRB IRT model as a base for more complex measurement models was also demonstrated by incorporating gender as a covariate into the BRB IRT model to explain response probabilities. Recommendations for the adoption of forced-choice formats were provided along with the discussion about using negatively keyed items.
© The Author(s) 2019.

Keywords:  Bayesian estimation; forced-choice format; multidimensional item response theory (IRT); random effect

Year:  2019        PMID: 32425220      PMCID: PMC7221495          DOI: 10.1177/0013164419871659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0013-1644            Impact factor:   2.821


  13 in total

1.  Fitting a Thurstonian IRT model to forced-choice data using Mplus.

Authors:  Anna Brown; Alberto Maydeu-Olivares
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2012-12

2.  Modeling local item dependence with the hierarchical generalized linear model.

Authors:  Hong Jiao; Shudong Wang; Akihito Kamata
Journal:  J Appl Meas       Date:  2005

3.  Forced-choice assessments of personality for selection: evaluating issues of normative assessment and faking resistance.

Authors:  Eric D Heggestad; Morgan Morrison; Charlie L Reeve; Rodney A McCloy
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2006-01

4.  Psychological scaling without a unit of measurement.

Authors:  C H COOMBS
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1950-05       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Comparing Traditional and IRT Scoring of Forced-Choice Tests.

Authors:  Pedro M Hontangas; Jimmy de la Torre; Vicente Ponsoda; Iwin Leenen; Daniel Morillo; Francisco J Abad
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2015-05-19

6.  The BUGS project: Evolution, critique and future directions.

Authors:  David Lunn; David Spiegelhalter; Andrew Thomas; Nicky Best
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Modeling subjective health outcomes: top 10 reasons to use Thurstone's method.

Authors:  Alberto Maydeu-Olivares; Ulf Böckenholt
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  A Dominance Variant Under the Multi-Unidimensional Pairwise-Preference Framework: Model Formulation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Estimation.

Authors:  Daniel Morillo; Iwin Leenen; Francisco J Abad; Pedro Hontangas; Jimmy de la Torre; Vicente Ponsoda
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-08-20

9.  Comparison of Single-Response Format and Forced-Choice Format Instruments Using Thurstonian Item Response Theory.

Authors:  David M Dueber; Abigail M A Love; Michael D Toland; Trisha A Turner
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 2.821

10.  On the Statistical and Practical Limitations of Thurstonian IRT Models.

Authors:  Paul-Christian Bürkner; Niklas Schulte; Heinz Holling
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 2.821

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.