Literature DB >> 29881066

A Dominance Variant Under the Multi-Unidimensional Pairwise-Preference Framework: Model Formulation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Estimation.

Daniel Morillo1, Iwin Leenen2, Francisco J Abad1, Pedro Hontangas3, Jimmy de la Torre4, Vicente Ponsoda1.   

Abstract

Forced-choice questionnaires have been proposed as a way to control some response biases associated with traditional questionnaire formats (e.g., Likert-type scales). Whereas classical scoring methods have issues of ipsativity, item response theory (IRT) methods have been claimed to accurately account for the latent trait structure of these instruments. In this article, the authors propose the multi-unidimensional pairwise preference two-parameter logistic (MUPP-2PL) model, a variant within Stark, Chernyshenko, and Drasgow's MUPP framework for items that are assumed to fit a dominance model. They also introduce a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) procedure for estimating the model's parameters. The authors present the results of a simulation study, which shows appropriate goodness of recovery in all studied conditions. A comparison of the newly proposed model with a Brown and Maydeu's Thurstonian IRT model led us to the conclusion that both models are theoretically very similar and that the Bayesian estimation procedure of the MUPP-2PL may provide a slightly better recovery of the latent space correlations and a more reliable assessment of the latent trait estimation errors. An application of the model to a real data set shows convergence between the two estimation procedures. However, there is also evidence that the MCMC may be advantageous regarding the item parameters and the latent trait correlations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian estimation; MCMC; forced-choice questionnaires; ipsative scores; multidimensional IRT

Year:  2016        PMID: 29881066      PMCID: PMC5978637          DOI: 10.1177/0146621616662226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0146-6216


  4 in total

1.  Fitting a Thurstonian IRT model to forced-choice data using Mplus.

Authors:  Anna Brown; Alberto Maydeu-Olivares
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2012-12

2.  Traditional scores versus IRT estimates on forced-choice tests based on a dominance model.

Authors:  Pedro M Hontangas; Iwin Leenen; Jimmy de la Torre; Vicente Ponsoda; Daniel Morillo; Francisco J Abad
Journal:  Psicothema       Date:  2016

3.  An investigation of emotional intelligence measures using item response theory.

Authors:  Seonghee Cho; Fritz Drasgow; Mengyang Cao
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2015-05-11

4.  Effect of personality item writing on psychometric properties of ideal-point and likert scales.

Authors:  Jialin Huang; Alan D Mead
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2014-07-07
  4 in total
  7 in total

1.  A Bayesian Random Block Item Response Theory Model for Forced-Choice Formats.

Authors:  HyeSun Lee; Weldon Z Smith
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 2.821

2.  Computerized Adaptive Testing for Ipsative Tests with Multidimensional Pairwise-Comparison Items: Algorithm Development and Applications.

Authors:  Xue-Lan Qiu; Jimmy de la Torre; Sage Ro; Wen-Chung Wang
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2022-04-14

3.  A genetic algorithm for optimal assembly of pairwise forced-choice questionnaires.

Authors:  Rodrigo Schames Kreitchmann; Francisco J Abad; Miguel A Sorrel
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-09-09

4.  Controlling for Response Biases in Self-Report Scales: Forced-Choice vs. Psychometric Modeling of Likert Items.

Authors:  Rodrigo Schames Kreitchmann; Francisco J Abad; Vicente Ponsoda; Maria Dolores Nieto; Daniel Morillo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-10-15

5.  On the Statistical and Practical Limitations of Thurstonian IRT Models.

Authors:  Paul-Christian Bürkner; Niklas Schulte; Heinz Holling
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 2.821

6.  Modeling Faking in the Multidimensional Forced-Choice Format: The Faking Mixture Model.

Authors:  Susanne Frick
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 2.290

7.  Bayesian paired comparison with the bpcs package.

Authors:  David Issa Mattos; Érika Martins Silva Ramos
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-11-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.