| Literature DB >> 32424962 |
Julien J Freudenreich1, Sean Bartlett1, Naomi S Robertson1, Sarah L Kidd1, Suzie Forrest2, Hannah F Sore1, Warren R J D Galloway1, Martin Welch2, David R Spring1.
Abstract
The cylindrocyclophanes are a family of macrocyclic natural products reported to exhibit antibacterial activity. Little is known about the structural basis of this activity due to the challenges associated with their synthesis or isolation. We hypothesised that structural modification of the cylindrocyclophane scaffold could streamline their synthesis without significant loss of activity. Herein, we report a divergent synthesis of the cylindrocyclophane core enabling access to symmetrical macrocycles by means of a catalytic, domino cross-metathesis-ring-closing metathesis cascade, followed by late-stage diversification. Phenotypic screening identified several novel inhibitors of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The most potent inhibitor has a unique tetrabrominated [7,7]paracyclophane core with no known counterpart in nature. Together these illustrate the potential of divergent synthesis using catalysis and unbiased screening methods in modern antibacterial discovery.Entities:
Keywords: cross metathesis; cylindrocyclophane; macrocycles; ring-closing metathesis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32424962 PMCID: PMC7522682 DOI: 10.1002/cmdc.202000179
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ChemMedChem ISSN: 1860-7179 Impact factor: 3.540
Figure 1Structural features of [7.7]paracyclophane natural products. All share a dimeric alkylresorcinol motif but differ in substitution pattern. R1–R4 represent side chain substituents.
Scheme 1Disconnection of the cylindrocyclophane core into symmetrical monomers. Dashed lines indicate the intended location of bond disconnection. P=protecting group.
Scheme 2Synthesis of cylindrocyclophanes 1 a–1 c. a) chloromethyl methyl ether (3.3 equiv), N,N‐diisopropylethylamine/CH2Cl2 (1 : 1), 0 °C to rt, 16 h, quant.; b) Me(MeO)NH⋅HCl (1.6 equiv), iPrMgCl (3.2 equiv), THF, −10 °C, 30 min, 75 %; c) Pd(OAc)2 (3 mol %), 1,1′‐bis(di‐tert‐butylphosphino)ferrocene (3.6 mol %), K2CO3 (3 equiv), allylboronic acid pinacol ester (2.5 equiv), THF, reflux, overnight, 78 %; d) alkenyl magnesium bromide (2 equiv), THF, 0 °C to rt, 2 h, 72–89 %; e) HCl/MeOH (1 : 2), 60 °C, 1–3 h, quant.; f) NEt3 (4.4 equiv), AcCl (4.4 equiv), CH2Cl2, 0 °C to rt, overnight, 66–87 %; g) Grubbs’ 2nd‐generation catalyst (5 mol %), CH2Cl2, reflux, 20 h, 4–61 %; h) NaOH (12 equiv), MeOH/CH2Cl2/H2O (4 : 1 : 1), rt, 1 h, 84–89 %; i) H2 (1 atm), Pd/BaSO4 (10 wt %), acetone, rt, overnight, 35–60 %.
Scheme 3Late‐stage diversification of [7.7]cylindrocyclophane 1 b. a) H2 (1 atm), Pd/BaSO4 (10 wt %), acetone, rt, overnight, 35 %; b) NaBH4 (4.8 equiv), MeOH, rt, 30 min, 55 %; c) NaBH4 (4.8 equiv), MeOH, rt, 30 min, then Pd/BaSO4 (10 wt %), acetone, rt, overnight, 68 % for second step; d) pyridinium tribromide (2.4 equiv), EtOH, rt, overnight, 23 %.
Figure 2Comparison of cylindrocyclophane A and 10, highlighting the alkylresorcinol motif in cylindrocyclophane A and the lack thereof in 10.