Literature DB >> 32424951

Opportunities for using in silico-based extended dosing regimens for monoclonal antibody immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Cody J Peer1, Daniel A Goldstein2, Jennifer C Goodell1, Ryan Nguyen1, William D Figg1, Mark J Ratain3.   

Abstract

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) involves frequent measurements of drug concentrations to ensure levels remain within a therapeutic window, and it is especially useful for drugs with narrow therapeutic indices or extensive interindividual pharmacokinetic variability. This technique has never been applied to immuno-oncology drugs, but, given recent examinations of clinical data (both exposure and response) on a number of these drugs, further investigations into TDM may be justified to reduce costs as well as potentially reducing the severity and/or duration of immune-related adverse events. Specifically, all but one of the approved PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors (pembrolizumab, nivolumab, cemiplimab-rwlc, atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab) have been shown to exhibit a plateaued exposure-response (E-R) curve at doses evaluated extensively to date, as well as time-dependent changes in drug exposure. Furthermore, responders have a greater decrease in drug clearance over time and would, therefore, have supratherapeutic serum concentrations. With frequent trough measurements, it is possible to use pharmacokinetic modelling and simulation to estimate drug clearance via Bayesian methods. Based on patient-specific estimates for clearance, optimal alternative dosing strategies can be simulated to lower drug and cost burden yet maintain therapeutic levels, especially as the clearance of the drug decreases over time. This review will comprehensively discuss each of the FDA approved PD-1, PD-L1/2 and CTLA-4 inhibitors regarding their indications and current recommended dosing, with evidence supporting the investigation of these types of TDM strategies.
© 2020 The British Pharmacological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  immune checkpoint inhibitors; oncology; therapeutic drug monitoring

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32424951      PMCID: PMC7444775          DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   3.716


  55 in total

1.  Association of time-varying clearance of nivolumab with disease dynamics and its implications on exposure response analysis.

Authors:  C Liu; J Yu; H Li; J Liu; Y Xu; P Song; Q Liu; H Zhao; J Xu; V E Maher; B P Booth; G Kim; A Rahman; Y Wang
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Time Is Money: Optimizing the Scheduling of Nivolumab.

Authors:  Mark J Ratain; Daniel A Goldstein
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Atezolizumab in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.

Authors:  M Stroh; H Winter; M Marchand; L Claret; S Eppler; J Ruppel; O Abidoye; S L Teng; W T Lin; S Dayog; R Bruno; J Jin; S Girish
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Predictive correlates of response to the anti-PD-L1 antibody MPDL3280A in cancer patients.

Authors:  Roy S Herbst; Jean-Charles Soria; Marcin Kowanetz; Gregg D Fine; Omid Hamid; Michael S Gordon; Jeffery A Sosman; David F McDermott; John D Powderly; Scott N Gettinger; Holbrook E K Kohrt; Leora Horn; Donald P Lawrence; Sandra Rost; Maya Leabman; Yuanyuan Xiao; Ahmad Mokatrin; Hartmut Koeppen; Priti S Hegde; Ira Mellman; Daniel S Chen; F Stephen Hodi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma who progressed after anti-CTLA-4 treatment (CheckMate 037): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Weber; Sandra P D'Angelo; David Minor; F Stephen Hodi; Ralf Gutzmer; Bart Neyns; Christoph Hoeller; Nikhil I Khushalani; Wilson H Miller; Christopher D Lao; Gerald P Linette; Luc Thomas; Paul Lorigan; Kenneth F Grossmann; Jessica C Hassel; Michele Maio; Mario Sznol; Paolo A Ascierto; Peter Mohr; Bartosz Chmielowski; Alan Bryce; Inge M Svane; Jean-Jacques Grob; Angela M Krackhardt; Christine Horak; Alexandre Lambert; Arvin S Yang; James Larkin
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Standard-dose pembrolizumab in combination with reduced-dose ipilimumab for patients with advanced melanoma (KEYNOTE-029): an open-label, phase 1b trial.

Authors:  Georgina V Long; Victoria Atkinson; Jonathan S Cebon; Michael B Jameson; Bernie M Fitzharris; Catriona M McNeil; Andrew G Hill; Antoni Ribas; Michael B Atkins; John A Thompson; Wen-Jen Hwu; F Stephen Hodi; Alexander M Menzies; Alexander D Guminski; Richard Kefford; Benjamin Y Kong; Babak Tamjid; Archana Srivastava; Anna J Lomax; Mohammed Islam; Xinxin Shu; Scot Ebbinghaus; Nageatte Ibrahim; Matteo S Carlino
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 7.  Cemiplimab-rwlc as first and only treatment for advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Saqib R Ahmed; Erik Petersen; Ravi Patel; Michael R Migden
Journal:  Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 5.045

8.  Nivolumab dose selection: challenges, opportunities, and lessons learned for cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Shruti Agrawal; Yan Feng; Amit Roy; Georgia Kollia; Brian Lestini
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 13.751

9.  Time-Varying Clearance and Impact of Disease State on the Pharmacokinetics of Avelumab in Merkel Cell Carcinoma and Urothelial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Justin J Wilkins; Brigitte Brockhaus; Haiqing Dai; Yulia Vugmeyster; Joleen T White; Satjit Brar; Carlo L Bello; Berend Neuteboom; Janet R Wade; Pascal Girard; Akash Khandelwal
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2019-04-25

10.  Alternative dosing regimens for atezolizumab: an example of model-informed drug development in the postmarketing setting.

Authors:  Kari M Morrissey; Mathilde Marchand; Hina Patel; Rong Zhang; Benjamin Wu; H Phyllis Chan; Almut Mecke; Sandhya Girish; Jin Y Jin; Helen R Winter; René Bruno
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 3.333

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Dosage of anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies: a cardinal open question.

Authors:  M Sureda; E Calvo; J J Mata; V Escudero-Ortiz; E Martinez-Navarro; A Catalán; J Rebollo
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Taking the brake off the immune system: Hypotheses, trials, tribulations, and the evolving discipline of clinical immunopharmacology.

Authors:  Jennifer H Martin; Lionel D Lewis
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Adoption of Extended-Interval Dosing of Single-Agent Pembrolizumab and Comparative Effectiveness vs Standard Dosing in Time-to-Treatment Discontinuation.

Authors:  Garth W Strohbehn; Robert Holleman; Jennifer Burns; Mandi L Klamerus; Michael J Kelley; Eve A Kerr; Nithya Ramnath; Timothy P Hofer
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 33.006

Review 4.  When Less May Be Enough: Dose Selection Strategies for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Focusing on AntiPD-(L)1 Agents.

Authors:  Daniel V Araujo; Bruno Uchoa; Juan José Soto-Castillo; Larissa L Furlan; Marc Oliva
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.864

Review 5.  Opportunities for using in silico-based extended dosing regimens for monoclonal antibody immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Authors:  Cody J Peer; Daniel A Goldstein; Jennifer C Goodell; Ryan Nguyen; William D Figg; Mark J Ratain
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 3.716

Review 6.  Immune checkpoint-targeted antibodies: a room for dose and schedule optimization?

Authors:  Christophe Maritaz; Sophie Broutin; Nathalie Chaput; Aurélien Marabelle; Angelo Paci
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 17.388

Review 7.  Dosing Regimens of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Attempts at Lower Dose, Less Frequency, Shorter Course.

Authors:  Mengjie Jiang; Yujie Hu; Gang Lin; Chao Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 5.738

8.  Direct analysis in real time-mass spectrometry for rapid quantification of five anti-arrhythmic drugs in human serum: application to therapeutic drug monitoring.

Authors:  Yuzhou Gui; Youli Lu; Shuijun Li; Mengqi Zhang; Xiaokun Duan; Charles C Liu; Jingying Jia; Gangyi Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.