Annika Kisch1, Ingrid Bolmsjö2, Stig Lenhoff3, Mariette Bengtsson4. 1. Department of Haematology, Skåne University Hospital, S-221 85 Lund, Sweden; Faculty of Health and Society, Malmö University, S-205 06 Malmö, Sweden. Electronic address: annika.kisch@mah.se. 2. Faculty of Health and Society, Malmö University, S-205 06 Malmö, Sweden. Electronic address: ingrid.bolmsjo@mah.se. 3. Department of Haematology, Skåne University Hospital, S-221 85 Lund, Sweden. Electronic address: stig.lenhoff@skane.se. 4. Faculty of Health and Society, Malmö University, S-205 06 Malmö, Sweden. Electronic address: mariette.bengtsson@mah.se.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is a lack of knowledge about sibling stem cell donors' experiences pre-donation and the waiting period before the donation might have been long. The donors and their corresponding sibling recipients were simultaneously included in two different interview studies. The results from the recipient study have been presented in a separate paper. PURPOSE: The aim was to explore the experiences of being a stem cell donor for a sibling, prior to donation. METHOD: Ten adult sibling donors were interviewed prior to stem cell donation. The interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim and subjected to qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: The main theme Being a cog in a big wheel describes the complex process of being a sibling donor prior to donation, covering a mixture of emotions and thoughts. The four subthemes Being available, Being anxious, Being concerned and Being obliged cover the various experiences. The sibling donors' experiences are influenced by the quality of the relationship with the sick sibling. CONCLUSIONS: Sibling stem cell donors go through a complex process once they have accidentally got involved in. They have been asked to become a donor; it was not a voluntary choice. In caring for sibling stem cell donors the nurses should be aware of the complexity of the process they experience and take into consideration their personal situation and needs. Providing optimal care for both sibling donors and their corresponding recipients is a challenge, and further improvement and exploration are needed.
BACKGROUND: There is a lack of knowledge about sibling stem cell donors' experiences pre-donation and the waiting period before the donation might have been long. The donors and their corresponding sibling recipients were simultaneously included in two different interview studies. The results from the recipient study have been presented in a separate paper. PURPOSE: The aim was to explore the experiences of being a stem cell donor for a sibling, prior to donation. METHOD: Ten adult sibling donors were interviewed prior to stem cell donation. The interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim and subjected to qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: The main theme Being a cog in a big wheel describes the complex process of being a sibling donor prior to donation, covering a mixture of emotions and thoughts. The four subthemes Being available, Being anxious, Being concerned and Being obliged cover the various experiences. The sibling donors' experiences are influenced by the quality of the relationship with the sick sibling. CONCLUSIONS: Sibling stem cell donors go through a complex process once they have accidentally got involved in. They have been asked to become a donor; it was not a voluntary choice. In caring for sibling stem cell donors the nurses should be aware of the complexity of the process they experience and take into consideration their personal situation and needs. Providing optimal care for both sibling donors and their corresponding recipients is a challenge, and further improvement and exploration are needed.
Authors: Margaret Bevans; Areej El-Jawahri; D Kathryn Tierney; Lori Wiener; William A Wood; Flora Hoodin; Erin E Kent; Paul B Jacobsen; Stephanie J Lee; Matthew M Hsieh; Ellen M Denzen; Karen L Syrjala Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2016-09-19 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Nina D Wagner-Johnston; Susan M Hannum; JaAlah-Ai Heughan; Martha Abshire; Jennifer L Wolff; Kathryn Yarkony; Heather Symons; Richard J Jones; Sydney M Dy Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2020-08-08 Impact factor: 5.742