Literature DB >> 32419079

A Scoping Review of Bikeability Assessment Methods.

Debra K Kellstedt1, John O Spengler2, Margaret Foster3, Chanam Lee4, Jay E Maddock2.   

Abstract

Bicycling holds promise as a healthy and sustainable means of transportation and physical activity. Despite the growing interest in community-based environmental approaches to promoting physical activity, bikeability has received relatively little attention. This paper provides a scoping review of the instruments developed to measure bikeability along with practice-based analyses of the tools related to user expertise, estimated cost, and required time to implement. The review summarizes the literature, identifies research gaps, and informs stakeholders with articles from EBSCO and transportation databases published after 2003 when the previous bikeability instrument review paper was published. Data extraction included the tool name, data collection method, study location, data collection scale, type of measure, and description. Two reviewers independently reviewed articles included in the full text review, and the inter-rater agreement exceeded 90%. The database search yielded 388 unique articles, and 17 met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Most of the studies, 11 of 17, were applied to settings outside of the U.S. Five studies employed a self-report survey, and five studies examined bikeability using geospatial data, like GIS. Seven studies used a direct observation audit tool-one specifically using a mobile app and another using virtual observation techniques with Google Street View. Bikeability tools are useful for assessing communities and their supports for bicycling. Our primary finding is that advances in technology over the past two decades have driven innovative and useful methodologies, in a variety of disciplines, for assessing the environment, but more consensus is needed to provide a universal definition of bikeability.

Keywords:  Bikeability; Environmental assessment tools; Physical activity; Scoping review

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 32419079     DOI: 10.1007/s10900-020-00846-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  24 in total

1.  Daily walking and cycling to work: their utility as health-enhancing physical activity.

Authors:  P Oja; I Vuori; O Paronen
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1998-04

Review 2.  Walking and bicycling: an evaluation of environmental audit instruments.

Authors:  Anne Vernez Moudon; Chanam Lee
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct

3.  Perceived and objective environmental measures and physical activity among urban adults.

Authors:  Christine M Hoehner; Laura K Brennan Ramirez; Michael B Elliott; Susan L Handy; Ross C Brownson
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Adult active transportation: adding habit strength to the theory of planned behavior.

Authors:  Gert-Jan de Bruijn; Stef P J Kremers; Amika Singh; Bas van den Putte; Willem van Mechelen
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 5.  Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: an international review.

Authors:  John Pucher; Jennifer Dill; Susan Handy
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. State indicator report on Physical Activity, 2014. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2014.

Authors:  Shelley McGuire
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 8.701

7.  Walking and cycling in the United States, 2001-2009: evidence from the National Household Travel Surveys.

Authors:  John Pucher; Ralph Buehler; Dafna Merom; Adrian Bauman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Physical activity in U.S.: adults compliance with the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans.

Authors:  Jared M Tucker; Gregory J Welk; Nicholas K Beyler
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Measuring physical activity environments: a brief history.

Authors:  James F Sallis
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 10.  Measuring the built environment for physical activity: state of the science.

Authors:  Ross C Brownson; Christine M Hoehner; Kristen Day; Ann Forsyth; James F Sallis
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.043

View more
  1 in total

1.  Realtors' Perceptions of Social and Physical Neighborhood Characteristics Associated with Active Living: A Canadian Perspective.

Authors:  Gavin R McCormack; Autumn Nesdoly; Dalia Ghoneim; Tara-Leigh McHugh
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 3.390

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.