| Literature DB >> 32416828 |
Xuemei Ding1, Jieming Du1, Keying Zhang1, Shiping Bai1, Qiufeng Zeng1, Huanwei Peng1, Yue Xuan1, Zhuowei Su1, Jianping Wang2.
Abstract
The tea polyphenol (TP) can improve the egg albumen quality in laying hens; however, our understanding of the molecular mechanisms and proteomic changes in the egg albumen remains limited. A total of 720 layers (35-wk-old) were allocated into 5 treatments with TP and were added at 0 (control), 200 (TP200), 400 (TP400), 600 (TP600), and 800 (TP800) mg/kg. It showed that 400 mg/kg TP increases albumen height and Haugh unit (quadratic effect, P < 0.01), while 400 mg/kg TP decreases gel strength, hardness, gumminess, and chewiness value in a quadratic manner (P = 0.01). Eggs from TP400-fed layers had highest reducing power and oxygen radical absorbance capacity, and lowest albumen malondialdehyde content (quadratic effect, P < 0.05). Through Tandem Mass Tag-based quantitative proteomics analysis, 258 proteins were identified and 31 differentially accumulated proteins in egg white affected by 400 mg/kg TP compared to control group, with 19 proteins upregulated and 12 proteins downregulated. A total of 11 binding proteins (A0A1D5PZE3, F1NTQ2, Q7SX63, F1NRV5, P24802, A0A1L1RM02, E1BTX1, A0A1L1RMF4, A0A1D5P1N3, A0A1L1RML6, A0A1L1RQF3), 9 immune response proteins (P10184, R4GI90, P01875, Q6IV20, Q64EU6, P02701, P08110, P0CB50, A0A1D5PQ63), and 3 cell redox homeostasis proteins (P0CB50, P20136, Q8JG64) were changed in albumen of laying hens fed TP400. The differentially expressed proteins mainly involved in pyruvate metabolism, cysteine and methionine metabolism, glutathione metabolism, glycolysis, and protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum pathway. The result gathered in this study suggested that the improving mechanism of TP on albumen quality may act through regulating binding mediation, immune function, and antioxidant activity-related proteins.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidative capacity; egg white; quantitative proteomic; tea polyphenols
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 32416828 PMCID: PMC7587682 DOI: 10.3382/ps/pez523
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Poult Sci ISSN: 0032-5791 Impact factor: 3.352
Ingredients and chemical composition of the basal diet (g/kg, as fed basis).
| Ingredients | Content, g/kg |
|---|---|
| Corn | 590.64 |
| Wheat bran | 38.67 |
| Soybean oil | 15.00 |
| Soybean meal, 43% CP | 152.36 |
| Corn gluten meal | 50.00 |
| Corn DDGS | 50.00 |
| CaCO3 | 86.03 |
| CaHPO4 | 9.41 |
| NaCl | 2.50 |
| NaHCO3 | 1.00 |
| L-Lysine | 1.62 |
| DL-Methionine | 0.12 |
| Choline chloride | 1.00 |
| Vitamin premix | 0.15 |
| Mineral premix | 1.50 |
| Total | 1,000.00 |
| Analyzed nutrient levels | |
| AME (kcal/kg) | 2,690 |
| Crude protein, % | 16.00 |
| Ether extract, % | 4.39 |
| Crude fiber, % | 2.69 |
| Calcium, % | 3.70 |
| Available phosphorus, % | 0.36 |
| Lysine, % | 0.65 |
| Methionine, % | 0.33 |
| Methionine + Cysteine, % | 0.23 |
Supplied per kilogram of diet: vitamin A, 12,000 IU; vitamin D3, 3,000 IU; vitamin E 7.5 IU; vitamin K2, 1.5 mg; vitamin B1, 0.6 mg; vitamin B2, 4.8 mg; vitamin B6, 1.8 mg; vitamin B12, 0.009 mg; pantothenic acid, 7.5 mg; folic acid, 0.15 mg/kg; niacin, 10.5 mg.
Supplied per kilogram of diet: 60 mg Mn (as MnSO4·H2 O); 80 mg Zn (as ZnSO4·7H2 O); 8 mg Cu (as CuSO4·5H2 O); 60 mg Fe (as FeSO4•7H2 O); 0.35 mg I (as KI); 0.3 mg Se (as Na2 SeO3•5H2 O).
Calculated by NRC (1994).
Effect of TP on the Egg White Quality of Laying Hens.1
| TP levels | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Items | Control | TP200 | TP400 | TP600 | TP800 | TP | Linear | Quadratic |
| pH | 8.41 | 8.24 | 8.33 | 8.37 | 8.29 | 0.64 | 0.77 | 0.53 |
| Albumen height, mm | 7.09 ± 0.80 | 7.21 ± 0.39 | 7.63 ± 0.70 | 7.31 ± 0.53 | 7.33 ± 0.23 | 0.02 | 0.06 | <0.01 |
| Haugh unit | 83.82 ± 0.67 | 84.97 ± 0.98 | 87.13 ± 1.15 | 85.13 ± 1.07 | 85.98 ± 1.05 | <0.01 | 0.06 | <0.01 |
| Albumen weight, % | 59.49 ± 2.37 | 60.02 ± 1.15 | 60.09 ± 0.99 | 61.31 ± 1.20 | 61.08 ± 1.33 | 0.21 | 0.02 | 0.08 |
| Thick albumen weight, % | 41.90 ± 7.38 | 43.33 ± 2.86 | 46.11 ± 5.48 | 44.62 ± 6.21 | 43.29 ± 4.26 | 0.73 | 0.56 | 0.42 |
| Thin albumen weight, % | 43.98 ± 4.45 | 45.22 ± 3.94 | 46.67 ± 5.27 | 42.62 ± 3.07 | 44.22 ± 4.38 | 0.57 | 0.70 | 0.72 |
Each mean represents 6 replicates, with 5 eggs/replicate. Abbreviation: TP = tea polyphenols, TP200 = 200 mg/kg tea polyphenols, TP400 = 400 mg/kg tea polyphnols, TP600 = 600 mg/kg tea polyphenols, TP800 = 800 mg/kg tea polyphenols.
Means in the same column with different letters differ significantly (P < 0.05).
Effect of TP on the egg white gels texture of laying hens.1
| TP level | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Items | Control | TP200 | TP400 | TP600 | TP800 | TP | Linear | Quadratic |
| Strength (g) | 758.48 ± 112.19 | 740.04 ± 67.39 | 567.47 ± 89.01 | 745.7 ± 99.97 | 784.87 ± 91.93 | 0.01 | 0.59 | 0.01 |
| Hardness (g) | 934.39 ± 108.53 | 903.1 ± 112.32 | 706.22 ± 92.98 | 905.96 ± 130.31 | 948.39 ± 110 | 0.02 | 0.53 | 0.02 |
| Adhesiveness (g/cm) | −68.83 ± 17.38 | −65.26 ± 16.18 | −66.57 ± 22.82 | −62.29 ± 14.53 | −69.37 ± 8.1 | 0.96 | 0.24 | 0.51 |
| Springiness (MPa) | 0.98 ± 0.02 | 0.99 ± 0.001 | 0.98 ± 0.01 | 0.98 ± 0.02 | 0.99 ± 0.004 | 0.53 | 0.89 | 0.44 |
| Cohesiveness (MPa) | 0.55 ± 0.03 | 0.55 ± 0.01 | 0.55 ± 0.01 | 0.55 ± 0.02 | 0.54 ± 0.02 | 0.97 | 0.80 | 0.47 |
| Gumminess (g) | 530.65 ± 48.9 | 488.41 ± 47.15 | 388.7 ± 58.95 | 499.1 ± 69.01 | 516.01 ± 66.56 | 0.01 | 0.49 | 0.03 |
| Chewiness (mJ) | 519.84 ± 45.14 | 505.63 ± 64.59 | 379.43 ± 55.43 | 488.2 ± 74.02 | 509.68 ± 63.93 | 0.01 | 0.50 | 0.03 |
| Resilience (MPa) | 0.22 ± 0.03 | 0.21 ± 0.01 | 0.22 ± 0.01 | 0.21 ± 0.01 | 0.20 ± 0.02 | 0.38 | 0.12 | 0.18 |
Each mean represents 6 replicates, with 5 eggs/replicate. Abbreviation: TP = tea polyphenols, TP200 = 200 mg/kg tea polyphenols, TP400 = 400 mg/kg tea polyphnols, TP600 = 600 mg/kg tea polyphenols, TP800 = 800 mg/kg tea polyphenols.
Means in the same column with different letters differ significantly (P < 0.05).
Figure 1Effect of tea polyphenol supplementation on the antioxidant activities in egg albumen and yolk of laying hens. (A) total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC); (B) malondialdehyde (MDA) content; (C) reducing power (RP); (D) oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) value. All data are mean ± standard deviation values. Different letters significant differences between samples of different treatment. Each mean represents 6 replicates, with 4 eggs/replicate.
Effect of TP on the egg white amino acid content of laying hens (mg/g egg white).1
| TP levels | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Items | Control | TP200 | TP400 | TP600 | TP800 | TP | Linear | Quadratic |
| Crude protein,% | 10.1 ± 0.7 | 10.3 ± 0.4 | 10.2 ± 0.5 | 10.2 ± 0.7 | 10.2 ± 0.8 | 0.47 | 0.63 | 0.77 |
| Lysine | 8.0 ± 0.4 | 8.1 ± 0.4 | 7.9 ± 0.3 | 8.2 ± 0.5 | 8.1 ± 0.6 | 0.51 | 0.44 | 0.37 |
| Leucine | 12.4 ± 0.9 | 12.1 ± 0.8 | 11.7 ± 0.7 | 12.0 ± 0.7 | 12.1 ± 0.9 | 0.14 | 0.25 | 0.84 |
| Valine | 8.1 ± 0.6 | 8.3 ± 0.7 | 8.2 ± 0.8 | 8.4 ± 0.6 | 8.1 ± 0.7 | 0.34 | 0.48 | 0.34 |
| Isoleucine | 6.8 ± 0.4 | 6.5 ± 0.5 | 6.9 ± 0.5 | 6.7 ± 0.5 | 6.9 ± 0.3 | 0.44 | 0.19 | 0.37 |
| Phenylalanine | 8.5 ± 0.6 | 8.6 ± 0.3 | 8.1 ± 0.3 | 8.0 ± 0.4 | 8.0 ± 0.3 | 0.77 | 0.69 | 0.24 |
| Threonine | 6.7 ± 0.3 | 6.3 ± 0.2 | 6.9 ± 0.3 | 7.1 ± 0.3 | 6.5 ± 0.4 | 0.37 | 0.54 | 0.18 |
| Methionine | 5.4 ± 0.2 | 5.7 ± 0.2 | 5.5 ± 0.3 | 5.9 ± 0.3 | 5.4 ± 0.2 | 0.79 | 0.85 | 0.32 |
| Histidine | 3.0 ± 0.7 | 2.8 ± 0.7 | 3.1 ± 0.7 | 3.2 ± 0.7 | 3.1 ± 0.7 | 0.47 | 0.25 | 0.27 |
| Glutamic acid | 14.3 ± 0.9 | 12.9 ± 1.1 | 13.8 ± 1.2 | 14.8 ± 0.9 | 14.2 ± 1.0 | 0.69 | 0.34 | 0.44 |
| Tryptophan | 2.3 ± 0.1 | 2.5 ± 0.2 | 2.9 ± 0.4 | 2.8 ± 0.4 | 2.7 ± 0.2 | 0.24 | 0.88 | 0.77 |
| Serine | 9.7 ± 0.8 | 10.1 ± 0.8 | 9.9 ± 0.7 | 9.8 ± 0.6 | 9.8 ± 0.7 | 0.88 | 0.61 | 0.68 |
| Aspartic | 13.5 ± 0.8 | 13.4 ± 0.9 | 12.9 ± 0.9 | 12.8 ± 1.2 | 13.1 ± 1.2 | 0.27 | 0.49 | 0.19 |
| Arginine | 8.1 ± 0.6 | 8.4 ± 0.7 | 8.7 ± 0.6 | 8.4 ± 0.4 | 8.5 ± 0.4 | 0.63 | 0.33 | 0.69 |
| Tyrosine | 4.1 ± 0.3 | 4.0 ± 0.2 | 4.2 ± 0.2 | 4.4 ± 0.2 | 4.2 ± 0.2 | 0.24 | 0.29 | 0.31 |
| Glycine | 5.0 ± 0.3 | 5.1 ± 0.4 | 5.2 ± 0.3 | 5.5 ± 0.3 | 5.4 ± 0.4 | 0.37 | 0.34 | 0.29 |
| Proline | 4.1 ± 0.3 | 3.9 ± 0.2 | 3.8 ± 0.2 | 4.1 ± 0.3 | 4.1 ± 0.2 | 0.29 | 0.66 | 0.11 |
| Cysteine | 2.7 ± 0.1 | 2.1 ± 0.1 | 2.5 ± 0.1 | 2.6 ± 0.1 | 2.8 ± 0.2 | 0.66 | 0.79 | 0.97 |
| ΣEAA | 58.8 ± 3.5 | 58.4 ± 2.7 | 58.3 ± 1.8 | 59.5 ± 2.1 | 58.2 ± 2.6 | 0.54 | 0.81 | 0.47 |
| ΣTAA | 123.0 ± 3.7 | 120.8 ± 4.6 | 121.7 ± 5.2 | 124.7 ± 3.5 | 123.4 ± 3.4 | 0.37 | 0.27 | 0.93 |
Each mean represents 6 replicates, with 4 eggs/replicate. Abbreviation: TP = tea polyphenols, TP200 = 200 mg/kg tea polyphenols, TP400 = 400 mg/kg tea polyphenols, TP600 = 600 mg/kg tea polyphenols, TP800 = 800 mg/kg tea polyphenols, EAA = percentage of essential amino acid for humans (including lysine, leucine, valine, isoleucine, phenylalanine, threonine, methionine, and histidine), TAA = percentage of total amino acids.
Figure 2Molecular weight (MW) distribution and coverage in this study. (A) Distribution of protein identified among different MWs. (B) Coverage of protein by the identified peptides. Most of the identified peptides had good peptide coverage, with ∼46% proteins having >10% of the sequence coverage, and ∼23% proteins having >20% sequence coverage. Each mean represents 6 replicates, with 2 eggs/replicate.
Differentially expressed proteins in albumen of 400 mg/kg TP group versus control group.1
| Protein accession | Description | Description of biological function | Gene | FC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Egg white protein | |||||
| I0J179 | Ovalbumin-related Y | None predicted | JPH3 | 1.60 | <0.01 |
| P10184 | Ovoinhibitor | Protease binding | OIH | 1.39 | 0.01 |
| Cell plasma membrane related protein | |||||
| F1NTQ2 | Beta-hexosaminidase subunit beta | Lysosome organization | HEXB | 1.43 | 0.05 |
| A0A1D5NYL9 | Uncharacterized protein | None predicted | LUZP2 | 1.33 | 0.01 |
| F1NRV5 | Uncharacterized protein | Immune response | CD80 | 0.76 | 0.02 |
| Protein related to biological process inside the cell metabolic process | |||||
| Response to stimulus | |||||
| Q7SX63 | Heat shock 70 kDa protein | Response to stimulus, binding | HSPA8 | 3.55 | 0.01 |
| P08110 | Endoplasmin | Response to stimulus, binding | HSP90B1 | 2.41 | 0.02 |
| P0CB50 | Peroxiredoxin-1 | Cell redox homeostasis | PRDX1 | 1.75 | 0.04 |
| R4GI90 | Uncharacterized protein | Innate immune response | OvoDA3 | 1.53 | 0.01 |
| Q6IV20 | Gallinacin-11 | Defense response to bacterium | GAL11 | 1.26 | 0.04 |
| P20136 | Glutathione S-transferase 2 | Cell redox homeostasis | GSTM2 | 1.25 | 0.04 |
| R4GLT1 | Cystatin | Defense response | CST3 | 1.24 | 0.04 |
| P02701 | Avidin | Antibacterial response; biotin binding | AVD | 1.24 | 0.01 |
| Q8JG64 | Protein disulfide-isomerase A3 | Cell redox homeostasis, identical protein binding | PDIA3 | 1.22 | 0.01 |
| A0A1D5PQ63 | Uncharacterized protein | Immune response | ENPP2 | 0.75 | 0.03 |
| A0A1L1RMF4 | Uncharacterized protein | Immune response | IGLL1 | 0.59 | 0.02 |
| P01875 | Ig mu chain C region | Immune response | — | 0.49 | 0.04 |
| A0A1L1RML6 | Uncharacterized protein | Immune response | IGLL1 | 0.45 | 0.04 |
| A0A1L1RQF3 | Immunoglobulin heavy variable 3-48 | Immune response | IGHV3-48 | 0.41 | 0.02 |
| Cell organization or biogenesis | |||||
| Q64EU6 | Betacellulin | Cell proliferation | BTC | 1.39 | 0.01 |
| E1BTX1 | Lipocalin | None predict | PTGDS | 0.73 | 0.01 |
| A0A1D5P5J0 | Chromatin target of PRMT1 protein | Cell proliferation | CHTOP | 0.63 | 0.02 |
| Metabolic process | |||||
| Q5ZME2 | Malate dehydrogenase, cytoplasmic | Carbohydrate metabolic process | MDH1 | 2.30 | 0.01 |
| P00940 | Triosephosphate isomerase | Gluconeogenesis | TPI1 | 2.16 | 0.02 |
| P00340 | L-lactate dehydrogenase A chain | Carbohydrate metabolic process | LDHA | 1.71 | 0.03 |
| O57579 | Aminopeptidase Ey | Peptide and metal binding | ANPEP | 1.26 | 0.03 |
| A0A1D5PZE3 | Apolipoprotein A-I | Lipid binding | APOA1 | 1.22 | <0.01 |
| A0A1D5P1N3 | Uncharacterized protein | ATP binding | PRKG2 | 0.78 | 0.01 |
| P24802 | Procollagen-lysine, 2-oxoglutarate 5-dioxygenase 1 | L-ascorbic acid binding | PLOD1 | 0.71 | 0.02 |
| R4GJP9 | Histone H2A type 1-J | DNA binding | HIST1H2AJ | 0.24 | 0.03 |
| A0A1L1RM02 | Uncharacterized protein | GTP binding | EEF1A | 0.07 | 0.03 |
Each mean represents 3 replicates, with 2 eggs/replicate.
Protein accession number from Uniprot database (www.Uniprot.org), FC = fold change.
Figure 3Bioinformatics analysis of the 31 proteins (1.2-fold) that were differentially expressed between the control and 400 mg/kg tea polyphenol groups. (A) Biological process: the protein participated in response to stimulus (16%), metabolic process (13%), and biological regulation (12%) were differential expressed; (B) cellular component: 37, 20, and 17% differential proteins located in the extracellular, cell and membrane, respectively; and (C) molecular function: binding proteins (66%) and catalytic activity (19%) were ranked at the top of the category for differential protein. Each mean represents 6 replicates, with 2 eggs/replicate.
Figure 4Functional classification of the significant up-regulated and down-regulated protein. (A) Molecular function and biological process; (B) subcellular location. Each mean represents 6 replicates, with 2 eggs/replicate.
Enriched KEGG pathway-based sets and GO terms of proteins of differential abundance in the albumen from layers fed 400 mg/kg tea polyphenols.1
| KEGG term | Term | Count | Protein accession | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| gga00620 | Pyruvate metabolism | 2 | P00340, Q5ZME2 | 0.01 |
| gga00270 | Cysteine and methionine metabolism | 2 | P00340, Q5ZME2 | 0.01 |
| gga00480 | Glutathione metabolism | 2 | P20136, O57579 | 0.02 |
| gga00010 | Glycolysis/gluconeogenesis | 2 | P00940, P00340 | 0.04 |
| gga04141 | Protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum | 3 | Q7SX63, P08110, Q8JG64 | 0.04 |
Each mean represents 3 replicates, with 2 eggs/replicate.
P values are calculated according to a modified Fisher's exact test and corrected for multiple testing using the Bonferroni correction provided by DAVID.
Figure 5The overview of effect of EGCG in layers. Tea polyphenol (TP) improve albumen quality and antioxidant activity, and the improve mechanism of TP on albumen quality may act through regulating binding mediation, immune function and antioxidant activity-related proteins.