Guolan Lu1, Nynke S van den Berg1, Brock A Martin2, Naoki Nishio1, Zachary P Hart1, Stan van Keulen1, Shayan Fakurnejad1, Stefania U Chirita3, Roan C Raymundo3, Grace Yi3, Quan Zhou1, George A Fisher4, Eben L Rosenthal5, George A Poultsides6. 1. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, CA, USA. 2. Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, CA, USA. 3. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, CA, USA; Cancer Clinical Trials Office, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, CA, USA. 4. Department of Medical Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, CA, USA. 5. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, CA, USA; Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, CA, USA. 6. Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, CA, USA. Electronic address: gpoultsides@stanford.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Complete surgical resection remains the primary curative option for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, with positive margins in 30-70% of patients. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the use of intraoperative tumour-specific imaging to enhance a surgeon's ability to detect visually occult cancer in real time. METHODS: In this single-centre, open-label, single-arm study, done in the USA, we enrolled patients who had clinically suspicious or biopsy-confirmed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas and were scheduled for curative surgery. Eligible patients were 19 years of age or older with a life expectancy of more than 12 weeks and a Karnofsky performance status of at least 70% or an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group or Zubrod level of one or lower, who were scheduled to undergo curative surgery. Patients were sequentially enrolled into each dosing group and 2-5 days before surgery, patients were intravenously infused with 100 mg of unlabelled panitumumab followed by 25 mg, 50 mg, or 75 mg of the near-infrared fluorescently labelled antibody (panitumumab-IRDye800CW). The primary endpoint was to determine the optimal dose of panitumumab-IRDye800CW in identifying pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas as measured by tumour-to-background ratio in all patients. The tumour-to-background ratio was defined as the fluorescence signal of the tumour divided by the fluorescence signal of the surrounding healthy tissue. The dose-finding part of this study has been completed. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03384238. FINDINGS: Between April, 2018, and July, 2019, 16 patients were screened for enrolment onto the study. Of the 16 screened patients, two (12%) patients withdrew from the study and three (19%) were not eligible; 11 (69%) patients completed the trial, all of whom were clinically diagnosed with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The mean tumour-to-background ratio of primary tumours was 3·0 (SD 0·5) in the 25 mg group, 4·0 (SD 0·6) in the 50 mg group, and 3·7 (SD 0·4) in the 75 mg group; the optimal dose was identified as 50 mg. Intraoperatively, near-infrared fluorescence imaging provided enhanced visualisation of the primary tumours, metastatic lymph nodes, and small (<2 mm) peritoneal metastasis. Intravenous administration of panitumumab-IRDye800CW at the doses of 25 mg, 50 mg, and 75 mg did not result in any grade 3 or higher adverse events. There were no serious adverse events attributed to panitumumab-IRDye800CW, although four possibly related adverse events (grade 1 and 2) were reported in four patients. INTERPRETATION: To our knowledge, this study presents the first clinical use of panitumumab-IRDye800CW for detecting pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas and shows that panitumumab-IRDye800CW is safe and feasible to use during pancreatic cancer surgery. Tumour-specific intraoperative imaging might have added value for treatment of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas through improved patient selection and enhanced visualisation of surgical margins, metastatic lymph nodes, and distant metastasis. FUNDING: National Institutes of Health and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research.
BACKGROUND: Complete surgical resection remains the primary curative option for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, with positive margins in 30-70% of patients. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the use of intraoperative tumour-specific imaging to enhance a surgeon's ability to detect visually occult cancer in real time. METHODS: In this single-centre, open-label, single-arm study, done in the USA, we enrolled patients who had clinically suspicious or biopsy-confirmed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas and were scheduled for curative surgery. Eligible patients were 19 years of age or older with a life expectancy of more than 12 weeks and a Karnofsky performance status of at least 70% or an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group or Zubrod level of one or lower, who were scheduled to undergo curative surgery. Patients were sequentially enrolled into each dosing group and 2-5 days before surgery, patients were intravenously infused with 100 mg of unlabelled panitumumab followed by 25 mg, 50 mg, or 75 mg of the near-infrared fluorescently labelled antibody (panitumumab-IRDye800CW). The primary endpoint was to determine the optimal dose of panitumumab-IRDye800CW in identifying pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas as measured by tumour-to-background ratio in all patients. The tumour-to-background ratio was defined as the fluorescence signal of the tumour divided by the fluorescence signal of the surrounding healthy tissue. The dose-finding part of this study has been completed. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03384238. FINDINGS: Between April, 2018, and July, 2019, 16 patients were screened for enrolment onto the study. Of the 16 screened patients, two (12%) patients withdrew from the study and three (19%) were not eligible; 11 (69%) patients completed the trial, all of whom were clinically diagnosed with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The mean tumour-to-background ratio of primary tumours was 3·0 (SD 0·5) in the 25 mg group, 4·0 (SD 0·6) in the 50 mg group, and 3·7 (SD 0·4) in the 75 mg group; the optimal dose was identified as 50 mg. Intraoperatively, near-infrared fluorescence imaging provided enhanced visualisation of the primary tumours, metastatic lymph nodes, and small (<2 mm) peritoneal metastasis. Intravenous administration of panitumumab-IRDye800CW at the doses of 25 mg, 50 mg, and 75 mg did not result in any grade 3 or higher adverse events. There were no serious adverse events attributed to panitumumab-IRDye800CW, although four possibly related adverse events (grade 1 and 2) were reported in four patients. INTERPRETATION: To our knowledge, this study presents the first clinical use of panitumumab-IRDye800CW for detecting pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas and shows that panitumumab-IRDye800CW is safe and feasible to use during pancreatic cancer surgery. Tumour-specific intraoperative imaging might have added value for treatment of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas through improved patient selection and enhanced visualisation of surgical margins, metastatic lymph nodes, and distant metastasis. FUNDING: National Institutes of Health and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research.
Authors: Johannes Schindelin; Ignacio Arganda-Carreras; Erwin Frise; Verena Kaynig; Mark Longair; Tobias Pietzsch; Stephan Preibisch; Curtis Rueden; Stephan Saalfeld; Benjamin Schmid; Jean-Yves Tinevez; Daniel James White; Volker Hartenstein; Kevin Eliceiri; Pavel Tomancak; Albert Cardona Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2012-06-28 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Willemieke S Tummers; Sarah E Miller; Nutte T Teraphongphom; Adam Gomez; Idan Steinberg; David M Huland; Steve Hong; Sri-Rajasekhar Kothapalli; Alifia Hasan; Robert Ertsey; Bert A Bonsing; Alexander L Vahrmeijer; Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg; Teri A Longacre; George A Fisher; Sanjiv S Gambhir; George A Poultsides; Eben L Rosenthal Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2018-04-17 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Stan van Keulen; Nynke S van den Berg; Naoki Nishio; Andrew Birkeland; Quan Zhou; Guolan Lu; Han-Wei Wang; Lyle Middendorf; Tymour Forouzanfar; Brock A Martin; A Dimitrios Colevas; Eben L Rosenthal Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2018-11-21 Impact factor: 5.337
Authors: Laetitia E Lamberts; Maximillian Koch; Johannes S de Jong; Arthur L L Adams; Jürgen Glatz; Mariëtte E G Kranendonk; Anton G T Terwisscha van Scheltinga; Liesbeth Jansen; Jakob de Vries; Marjolijn N Lub-de Hooge; Carolien P Schröder; Annelies Jorritsma-Smit; Matthijs D Linssen; Esther de Boer; Bert van der Vegt; Wouter B Nagengast; Sjoerd G Elias; Sabrina Oliveira; Arjen J Witkamp; Willem P Th M Mali; Elsken Van der Wall; Paul J van Diest; Elisabeth G E de Vries; Vasilis Ntziachristos; Gooitzen M van Dam Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2016-11-09 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Paula Ghaneh; Jorg Kleeff; Christopher M Halloran; Michael Raraty; Richard Jackson; James Melling; Owain Jones; Daniel H Palmer; Trevor F Cox; Chloe J Smith; Derek A O'Reilly; Jakob R Izbicki; Andrew G Scarfe; Juan W Valle; Alexander C McDonald; Ross Carter; Niall C Tebbutt; David Goldstein; Robert Padbury; Jennifer Shannon; Christos Dervenis; Bengt Glimelius; Mark Deakin; Alan Anthoney; Markus M Lerch; Julia Mayerle; Attila Oláh; Charlotte L Rawcliffe; Fiona Campbell; Oliver Strobel; Markus W Büchler; John P Neoptolemos Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Thomas Schnelldorfer; Adam L Ware; Michael G Sarr; Thomas C Smyrk; Lizhi Zhang; Rui Qin; Rachel E Gullerud; John H Donohue; David M Nagorney; Michael B Farnell Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Naoki Nishio; Nynke S van den Berg; Stan van Keulen; Brock A Martin; Shayan Fakurnejad; Nutte Teraphongphom; Stefania U Chirita; Nicholas J Oberhelman; Guolan Lu; Crista E Horton; Michael J Kaplan; Vasu Divi; A Dimitrios Colevas; Eben L Rosenthal Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2019-11-06 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Rahul Pal; Marisa E Hom; Nynke S van den Berg; Thinzar M Lwin; Yu-Jin Lee; Andrey Prilutskiy; William Faquin; Eric Yang; Srinivas V Saladi; Mark A Varvares; Eben L Rosenthal; Anand T N Kumar Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2022-06-01 Impact factor: 13.801
Authors: Feredun Azari; Gregory Kennedy; Elizabeth Bernstein; Constantinos Hadjipanayis; Alexander Vahrmeijer; Barbara Smith; Eben Rosenthal; Baran Sumer; Jie Tian; Eric Henderson; Amy Lee; Quyen Nguyen; Summer Gibbs; Brian Pogue; Daniel Orringer; Cleopatra Charalampaki; Linda Martin; Janos Tanyi; Major Lee; John Y Lee; Sunil Singhal Journal: J Biomed Opt Date: 2021-05 Impact factor: 3.170
Authors: Martijn A van Dam; Floris A Vuijk; Judith A Stibbe; Ruben D Houvast; Saskia A C Luelmo; Stijn Crobach; Shirin Shahbazi Feshtali; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Bert A Bonsing; Cornelis F M Sier; Peter J K Kuppen; Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg; Albert D Windhorst; Jacobus Burggraaf; Alexander L Vahrmeijer; J Sven D Mieog Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-12-02 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Quan Zhou; Nynke S van den Berg; Eben L Rosenthal; Michael Iv; Michael Zhang; Johana C M Vega Leonel; Shannon Walters; Naoki Nishio; Monica Granucci; Roan Raymundo; Grace Yi; Hannes Vogel; Romain Cayrol; Yu-Jin Lee; Guolan Lu; Marisa Hom; Wenying Kang; Melanie Hayden Gephart; Larry Recht; Seema Nagpal; Reena Thomas; Chirag Patel; Gerald A Grant; Gordon Li Journal: Theranostics Date: 2021-05-21 Impact factor: 11.556
Authors: Thinzar M Lwin; Michael A Turner; Siamak Amirfakhri; Hiroto Nishino; Robert M Hoffman; Michael Bouvet Journal: Cells Date: 2022-01-12 Impact factor: 6.600