Literature DB >> 32416282

Estimating dose delivery accuracy in stereotactic body radiation therapy: A review of in-vivo measurement methods.

Marco Esposito1, Elena Villaggi2, Sara Bresciani3, Savino Cilla4, Maria Daniela Falco5, Cristina Garibaldi6, Serenella Russo7, Cinzia Talamonti8, Michele Stasi3, Pietro Mancosu9.   

Abstract

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been recognized as a standard treatment option for many anatomical sites. Sophisticated radiation therapy techniques have been developed for carrying out these treatments and new quality assurance (QA) programs are therefore required to guarantee high geometrical and dosimetric accuracy. This paper focuses on recent advances on in-vivo measurements methods (IVM) for SBRT treatment. More specifically, all of the online QA methods for estimating the effective dose delivered to patients were compared. Determining the optimal IVM for performing SBRT treatments would reduce the risk of errors that could jeopardize treatment outcome. A total of 89 papers were included. The papers were subdivided into the following topics: point dosimeters (PD), transmission detectors (TD), log file analysis (LFA), electronic portal imaging device dosimetry (EPID), dose accumulation methods (DAM). The detectability capability of the main IVM detectors/devices were evaluated. All of the systems have some limitations: PD has no spatial data, EPID has limited sensitivity towards set-up errors and intra-fraction motion in some anatomical sites, TD is insensitive towards patient related errors, LFA is not an independent measure, DAMs are not always based on measures. In order to minimize errors in SBRT dose delivery, we recommend using synergic combinations of two or more of the systems described in our review: on-line tumor position and patient information should be combined with MLC position and linac output detection accuracy. In this way the effects of SBRT dose delivery errors will be reduced.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EPID dosimetry; In-vivo dosimetry; Quality assurance

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32416282     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.05.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  8 in total

1.  Improving dose delivery accuracy with EPID in vivo dosimetry: results from a multicenter study.

Authors:  M Esposito; A Piermattei; S Bresciani; L C Orlandini; M D Falco; S Giancaterino; S Cilla; A Ianiro; R Nigro; L Botez; S Riccardi; A Fidanzio; F Greco; E Villaggi; S Russo; M Stasi
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 2.  In vivo dosimetry in external beam photon radiotherapy: Requirements and future directions for research, development, and clinical practice.

Authors:  Igor Olaciregui-Ruiz; Sam Beddar; Peter Greer; Nuria Jornet; Boyd McCurdy; Gabriel Paiva-Fonseca; Ben Mijnheer; Frank Verhaegen
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-08-29

3.  Effect of an integral quality monitor on 4-, 6-, 10-MV, and 6-MV flattening filter-free photon beams.

Authors:  Trang Hong Thi Nguyen; Haruna Yokoyama; Hironori Kojima; Naoki Isomura; Akihiro Takemura; Shinichi Ueda; Kimiya Noto
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Optimisation of a composite difference metric for prompt error detection in real-time portal dosimetry of simulated volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  James L Bedford; Ian M Hanson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Verification of an optimizer algorithm by the beam delivery evaluation of intensity-modulated arc therapy plans.

Authors:  Tamas Pocza; Domonkos Szegedi; Tibor Major; Csilla Pesznyak
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  A recurrent neural network for rapid detection of delivery errors during real-time portal dosimetry.

Authors:  James L Bedford; Ian M Hanson
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-04-20

7.  Head and neck radiotherapy on the MR linac: a multicenter planning challenge amongst MRIdian platform users.

Authors:  Madalyne Chamberlain; Jerome Krayenbuehl; Janita E van Timmeren; Lotte Wilke; Nicolaus Andratschke; Helena Garcia Schüler; Stephanie Tanadini-Lang; Matthias Guckenberger; Panagiotis Balermpas
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 3.621

8.  Quality Assurance for Small-Field VMAT SRS and Conventional-Field IMRT Using the Exradin W1 Scintillator.

Authors:  Zike Huang; Jian Qiao; Cui Yang; Ming Liu; Jiazhou Wang; Xu Han; Weigang Hu
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.