| Literature DB >> 32415794 |
Savannah Giannasi1, Yukitaka Kani1, Fang-Chi Hsu2, John H Rossmeisl1,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intracranial hypertension (ICH) is often presumptively diagnosed based on clinical or imaging findings. Clinical or imaging surrogates of ICH are not usually validated with reference standard direct intracranial pressure (dICP) recordings. HYPOTHESES: Dogs with brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or clinical features of presumed ICH would have higher dICP than dogs lacking those features. ANIMALS: Twenty dogs with gliomas and 3 normal controls.Entities:
Keywords: brain tumor; canine; imaging biomarkers; intracranial hypertension; modified Glasgow coma scale
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32415794 PMCID: PMC7379039 DOI: 10.1111/jvim.15802
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vet Intern Med ISSN: 0891-6640 Impact factor: 3.333
FIGURE 1Methodological summary of direct intracranial pressure monitoring (dICP) procedure with intraparenchymal catheter strain‐gauge microtransducer. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging examinations of the brain are obtained with the dog instrumented in a stereotactic headframe, A, to allow for planning for an approach to the brain and tumor that will simultaneously allow for dICP, stereotactic needle biopsy of the tumor, and catheter or electrode‐based tumor treatment through a minimally invasive burr‐hole craniectomy with probe guide pedestal (PGP) placement, B. PGP placement is confirmed with postoperative imaging, C, before treatment. The dICP transducer, D, is placed through 1 operating channel of the PGP (inset) to a depth of 10 mm into grossly normal appearing brain parenchyma, and then connected to the dICP monitor
Composite clinical scoring system used to estimate intracranial pressure in dogs
| Clinical examination | Score range | Adjusted score |
|---|---|---|
| Fundoscopic score (FS) |
0 = Normal 1 = Papilledema | 0 or 1 |
| Karnofsky performance score (KPS) | 0‐100 | 100‐dogscore/10 = aKPS |
| Modified Glasgow coma scale score (MGCS) | 3‐18 | 18‐dog score = aMGCS |
| Composite clinical score (CCS) | 0‐26 | CCS = FS + aKPS + aMGCS |
Higher CCS indicative of more severe clinical dysfunction; CCS ≥ 4 considered indicative of presumptive intracranial hypertension.
Comparison of clinical variables and composite clinical scores between clinically predicted and MRI‐predicted ICP groups
| Mean (SD) group scores | Mean (SD) group scores | Mean (SD) group scores | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical assessment (range) | Control | Tumor |
| Clinically predicted normal ICP | Clinically predicted ICH |
| MRI‐predictednormal ICP | MRI‐predictedICH |
|
| Fundoscopic score (0–1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | NA | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | NA | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | NA |
| Karnofsky performance score (0–100) | 100 (0) | 75.3 (15.3) | .01* | 92.2 (6.7) | 69.6 (15.1) | .0001* | 82.5 (13.6) | 75.4 (18.6) | .66 |
| Modified Glasgow coma scale (3–18) | 18 (0) | 16.2 (2.0) | .04* | 17.9 (.33) | 15.5 (2.0) | .0006* | 16.8 (1.6) | 16.2 (2.2) | .48 |
|
Composite clinical score (0‐26) | 0 (0) | 4.4 (3.4) | .01* | .9 (.9) | 5.7 (3.2) | .0008* | 3.1 (2.7) | 4.4 (4.0) | .62 |
Abbreviations: ICH, intracranial hypertension; ICP, intracranial pressure; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
Statistically significant: *P < .05.
FIGURE 2Comparisons of intracranial pressures (ICP; left column), mean arterial pressures (MAP; middle column), and cerebral perfusion pressures (CPP; right column) between control and tumor‐bearing dogs, A, dogs with clinically predicted normal ICP and clinically predicted intracranial hypertension (ICH; B), and dogs with MRI‐predicted normal ICP and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) predicted ICH, C. The ICP is significantly higher (P = .004*) in dogs with MRI‐predicted ICH compared to dogs with MRI‐predicted normal ICP (C, left panel). No significant differences were noted between MAP or CPP in any group
Qualitative MRI feature comparisons between MRI‐predicted ICP groups
| MRI feature | MRI‐predicted ICP group; frequency (%) |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predicted normal ICP | Predicted ICH | |||
| Sulci effacement | Absent | 3 (13%) | 0 (0%) | .07 |
| Present | 7 (30%) | 13 (57%) | ||
| Transtentorial herniation | Absent | 10 (43%) | 6 (26%) | .008* |
| Present | 0 (0%) | 7 (30%) | ||
| Foramen magnum herniation | Absent | 10 (43%) | 8 (34%) | .04* |
| Present | 0 (0%) | 5 (22%) | ||
| Subfalcine herniation | Absent | 10 (43%) | 8 (34%) | .04* |
| Present | 0 (0%) | 5 (22%) | ||
| Lamina quadrigemina position | Rostral | 10 (43%) | 5 (22%) | .002* |
| Caudal | 0 (0%) | 8 (34%) | ||
| Perilesional edema | Absent | 6 (26%) | 0 (0%) | .002* |
| Present | 4 (17%) | 13 (57%) | ||
| Third ventricular compression | Absent | 8 (34%) | 2 (9%) | .003* |
| Present | 2 (9%) | 11 (48%) | ||
| Fourth ventricular compression | Absent | 10 (43%) | 10 (43%) | .22 |
| Present | 0 (0%) | 3 (13%) | ||
| Falx shift | Absent | 9 (39%) | 1 (4%) | .0001* |
| Present | 1 (4%) | 12 (52%) | ||
Abbreviations: ICH, intracranial hypertension; ICP, intracranial pressure; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
Statistically significant: *P < .05.
Quantitative MRI feature comparisons between MRI‐predicted ICP groups
| MRI feature | MRI‐predicted ICP group | Mean (SD) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| T2W lesion volume (cm3) | Predicted normal ICP | 1.45 (1.2) | .0004* |
| Predicted ICH | 5.71 (3.03) | ||
| T2 brain volume (cm3) | Predicted normal ICP | 77.32 (13.12) | .28 |
| Predicted ICH | 84.78 (18.08) | ||
| T2W lesion volume : brain volume | Predicted normal ICP | 0.02 (0.01) | .0004* |
| Predicted ICH | 0.06 (0.03) | ||
| Right optic nerve sheath diameter : BW | Predicted normal ICP | 0.24 (0.18) | .01* |
| Predicted ICH | 0.33 (0.26) | ||
| Left optic nerve sheath diameter : BW | Predicted normal ICP | 0.22 (0.17) | .04* |
| Predicted ICH | 0.35 (0.21) |
Abbreviations: BW, body weight; ICH, intracranial hypertension; ICP, intracranial pressure; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
Statistically significant: *P < .05.