| Literature DB >> 32414332 |
Masayuki Koshikawa1, Masahide Harada1, Shunsuke Noyama2, Ken Kiyono2, Yuji Motoike1, Yoshihiro Nomura1, Asuka Nishimura1, Hideo Izawa3, Eiichi Watanabe4, Yukio Ozaki1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inflammation and skeletal muscle wasting often coexist in elderly populations, but few studies have examined their relationship in elderly heart failure (HF) patients. This study examined the relationship between inflammation and increased skeletal muscle proteolysis, reduced skeletal mass and strength, and their prognostic implications in elderly HF patients (> 65 years) using a random forest approach.Entities:
Keywords: Elderly; Frailty; Mortality; Sarcopenia
Year: 2020 PMID: 32414332 PMCID: PMC7229573 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-020-01514-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord ISSN: 1471-2261 Impact factor: 2.298
Clinical characteristics of the patients
| Characteristic | Control | Heart failure | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 72 ± 5 | 73 ± 8 | 0.21 |
| Female | 24 (29) | 28 (36) | 0.15 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 23.3 ± 3.5 | 22.8 ± 4.2 | 0.42 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 123 ± 17 | 125 ± 23 | 0.69 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 75 ± 13 | 76 ± 14 | 0.51 |
| Cardiac rhythm | 0.40 | ||
| Sinus rhythm | 35 (42) | 23 (29) | |
| Paroxysmal/persistent AF | 48 (58) | 55 (71) | |
| Medical comorbidities | |||
| Coronary artery disease | 6 (7) | 6 (8) | 0.86 |
| Valvular disease | 1 (1) | 10 (13) | < 0.001 |
| Hypertension | 30 (36) | 38 (49) | 0.11 |
| Diabetes | 10 (12) | 16 (21) | 0.14 |
| Dyslipidemia | 17 (20) | 14 (18) | 0.68 |
| TIA/Stroke | 4 (5) | 11 (14) | < 0.05 |
| Laboratory data | |||
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 13.8 ± 11.7 | 12.7 ± 2.0 | < 0.001 |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.83 ± 0.19 | 0.88 ± 0.39 | 0.36 |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73m2) | 68 ± 17 | 66 ± 18 | 0.39 |
| CRP (mg/dL) | 0.16 ± 0.26 | 0.70 ± 1.16 | < 0.001 |
| IL-6 (pg/mL) | 3.30 ± 3.71 | 8.08 ± 7.05 | < 0.001 |
| Creatine kinase (IU/L) | 91 ± 33 | 92 ± 50 | 0.87 |
| BNP (pg/mL) | 41 ± 28 | 328 ± 249 | < 0.001 |
| LVEF (%) | 56 ± 11 | 45 ± 16 | < 0.001 |
| LAD (mm) | 35 ± 5.8 | 40 ± 7.4 | < 0.001 |
| Medications | |||
| β-Blocker | 59 (71) | 75 (96) | < 0.001 |
| ACE-I/ARB | 29 (35) | 66 (85) | < 0.001 |
| Loop diuretics | 4 (5) | 31 (40) | < 0.001 |
| Aldosterone blocker | 5 (6) | 18 (23) | < 0.01 |
| Calcium blocker | 23 (28) | 19 (24) | 0.56 |
| Statin | 16 (19) | 27 (35) | < 0.05 |
| Aspirin | 10 (12) | 21 (27) | 0.16 |
| Anticoagulant | 48 (58) | 56 (72) | 0.09 |
AF Atrial fibrillation, TIA Transient ischemic attack, eGFR Estimated glomerular filtration rate, CRP High-sensitivity C-reactive protein, IL-6 Interleukin 6, BNP B-type natriuretic peptide, LVEF Left ventricular ejection fraction, LAD Left atrial dimension, ACE-I Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, ARB Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker. Data represent the number, frequency, or means±SD
Skeletal muscle measurements and the 6-min walk distance
| Control | Heart failure | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thigh circumference (cm) | 48 ± 7.2 | 42 ± 8.2 | < 0.001 |
| Thigh muscle thickness (cm) | 2.9 ± 0.2 | 1.8 ± 0.3 | < 0.001 |
| Knee extensor strength (kg) | 19.7 ± 6.4 | 13.9 ± 4.4 | < 0.001 |
| 3-MH/Cr (nmol/g Cr) | 191 ± 144 | 386 ± 445 | < 0.001 |
| 6-min walk distance (m) | 570 ± 45 | 534 ± 45 | < 0.001 |
3-MH 3-methylhystidine, Cr Creatinine. Data represent means±SD
Relationships between the clinical features and skeletal muscle measurements in the controls
| Age | Female | AF | CRP | IL-6 | BNP | LAD | LVEF | Thigh circumference | Rectus femoris thickness | Knee extensor strength | 3-MH/Cr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | − 0.03 | |||||||||||
| AF | −0.14 | − 0.04 | ||||||||||
| CRP | −0.06 | − 0.16 | − 0.12 | |||||||||
| IL-6 | 0.08 | −0.13 | − 0.18 | 0.53§ | ||||||||
| BNP | 0.02 | 0.21 | 0.13 | 0.07 | 0.17 | |||||||
| LAD | −0.05 | − 0.10 | 0.16 | 0.26* | 0.27* | 0.43§ | ||||||
| LVEF | −0.03 | 0.05 | 0.01 | −0.22* | − 0.26* | − 0.15 | − 0.19 | |||||
| Thigh circumference | −0.29* | − 0.40# | − 0.15 | −0.15 | − 0.03 | − 0.40# | − 0.17 | −0.02 | ||||
| Rectus femoris thickness | −0.32* | −0.40# | − 0.11 | −0.12 | − 0.10 | −0.16 | − 0.02 | 0.09 | 0.58§ | |||
| Knee extensor strength | −0.37# | −0.32# | − 0.10 | −0.10 | − 0.15 | −0.31 | − 0.04 | 0.16 | 0.43# | 0.64 § | ||
| 3-MH/Cr | 0.22* | 0.16 | −0.17 | 0.09 | 0.13 | 0.17 | 0.03 | −0.16 | 0.05 | −0.14 | −0.23* | |
| 6-min walk distance | −0.29* | −0.14 | − 0.07 | −0.30# | − 0.57§ | −0.41# | − 0.43§ | 0.18 | 0.34# | 0.29* | 0.25* | −0.22* |
The abbreviations are as in Tables 1 and 2. *P < 0.05, #p < 0.01, §p < 0.001
Relationships between the clinical features and skeletal muscle measurements in the heart failure patients
| Age | Female | AF | CRP | IL-6 | BNP | LAD | LVEF | Thigh circumference | Rectus femoris thickness | Knee extensor strength | 3-MH/Cr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | −0.05 | |||||||||||
| AF | −0.13 | 0.13 | ||||||||||
| CRP | 0.13 | 0.10 | 0.11 | |||||||||
| IL-6 | 0.22 | 0.07 | 0.21 | 0.51§ | ||||||||
| BNP | 0.31# | 0.04 | 0.31# | 0.31# | 0.50§ | |||||||
| LAD | 0.05 | −0.07 | 0.22* | 0.16 | 0.05 | 0.24* | ||||||
| LVEF | 0.08 | −0.08 | − 0.23 | −0.32§ | − 0.52§ | −0.49§ | − 0.20 | |||||
| Thigh circumference | −0.41# | −0.14 | 0.13 | −0.17 | − 0.22 | −0.40# | − 0.02 | 0.32# | ||||
| Rectus femoris thickness | −0.35# | −0.31* | 0.07 | −0.27# | − 0.41§ | −0.42§ | − 0.05 | 0.31# | 0.49§ | |||
| Knee extensor strength | −0.36# | −0.21 | 0.05 | −0.36# | − 0.41§ | −0.60§ | − 0.14 | 0.43§ | 0.50§ | 0.69§ | ||
| 3-MH/Cr | 0.09 | 0.17 | 0.26* | 0.21# | 0.28# | 0.26# | 0.14 | −0.12 | −0.26* | −0.24* | − 0.22* | |
| 6-min walk distance | −0.19 | −0.14 | 0.10 | −0.42§ | − 0.77§ | −0.42§ | − 0.16 | 0.46§ | 0.23* | 0.32* | 0.37# | −0.28* |
The abbreviations are as in Tables 1 and 2. *P < 0.05, #p < 0.01, §p < 0.001
Fig. 1The mean decreased impurity from cross-validation procedure. This figure is sorted by the order of contribution of each variable for risk prediction. The random forest model selected 19 variables
Fig. 2a Receiver operating characteristics curve. The cutoff points for the dichotomization (0.499) were determined by maximizing the sensitivity and specificity of the receiver-operating characteristics curve. b Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. The Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a significantly higher event rate in patients classified as a high-risk group by a random forest model (hazard ratio 22.3, log-rank test, p < 0.0001)