Literature DB >> 32413711

Psychological underpinning of panic buying during pandemic (COVID-19).

S M Yasir Arafat1, Sujita Kumar Kar2, Marthoenis Marthoenis3, Pawan Sharma4, Ehsanul Hoque Apu5, Russell Kabir6.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32413711      PMCID: PMC7202808          DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Res        ISSN: 0165-1781            Impact factor:   11.225


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, Epidemics and pandemics are the impending public health challenges whereby fear and panic are integral human responses historically (Bonneux and Van Damme ,2006). Panic behavior during disaster and calamities is an expected response they threaten the ability to cope and destroy the existing equilibrium. Many a time, people develop much-unexplained behavior which differs from country to country, culture to culture. Panic buying / increased buying behavior has been observed during public health emergencies since the ancient period. However, the exact psychological explanation responsible for it has not sought systematically. Therefore, we intended a thrust to identify the possible psychological explanations behind the panic buying behavior during crisis moments such as, pandemics. A perception of scarcity (the perceived scarcity effect) is strongly linked with the panic buying behavior and hoarding behaviors increases if the scarcity develops for the immediate necessaries (Wilkens, 2020; Dholakia, 2020; Bonneux and Van Damme, 2006). It also creates a feeling of insecurity which in turn activates another mechanism to collect things (Dholakia, 2020). A perceived sense of losing control over the environment can responsible for that. During a crisis period, people generally like to control things and this brings them some aspect of certainty (Wilkens, 2000). People don't want to get engaged in any kind of debate, and the moral insecurity pushes them to take action to alleviate anxiety and bring back the feeling of control (Yap, 2020). The phenomenon may be explained as a remedial response to reduce fear and anxiety of losing control over the surrounding environment (Dholakia ,2020). As there prevail extraordinary uncertainty, individuals anticipate regret if they fail to collect necessaries when they are available. Moreover, people have not to control the pandemic creating the wish to have control at least something those are needed during the crisis (Bonneux and Van Damme, 2006). Panic buying also has been linked with perceived feeling of insecurity and instability of certain situations (Hendrix, 2013). The Pandemic status of corona in 2020 leaves the community with uncertainty. The people unsure when the calamity would end, thus saving basic needs by purchasing as many as possible is a shortcut to cope with the feeling of insecurity. Furthermore, supply disruption, a condition where normal product supply in supply chain interrupted, has been frequently observed during a disaster or other unwanted calamities (Shou, 2013). This also led to a feeling of insecurity. As a social being, sometimes we gauge the intensity of the crisis by the reactions of our surrounding fellows which explain the social learning theory for the phenomenon. In response to the panic buying of others, people tend to indulge to buy madly (Dholakia, 2020). It can be also described as the herd instinct (Wilkens, 2020). The phenomenon can also be attributed to similar things that happened during other epidemics and natural calamities in the past. Stockpiling of drugs and vaccines is regarded as a method of preparation in cases of pandemics (Jennings et al., 2008). So, by extension, the general public might start stockpiling the goods necessary to them. In an emergency or crisis moment, the primitive part of our brain usually becomes more prominent and indulges us in the behaviors that are necessary for survival (Dodgson, 2020). Moreover, primitive instinctual behaviors have poor humanistic expression and rational thinking which could be an important aspect to explain the phenomenon. It has been noticed that during the crisis of calamities, people sometimes believe that the Government will not be able to control black marketing and provide support to the countrymen. Lack of trust and anticipation of the exhaustion of resources might be responsible for panic buying. They unthinkingly overestimate the risk of danger along with underestimating the possibilities of help (Bonneux and Van Damme, 2006). Sometimes people get threatening perception from the media reports that people are buying excessively than before; there is a possibility of a global crisis. Sometimes, the media reports the crisis in a sensational way which raises more panic. Another important factor is the way the viruses or any pandemic has been portrayed in the movies. People tend to learn from them and try to imitate whenever they are faced with pandemics (Schell, 1997). In summary, fear of scarcity and losing control over the environment, insecurity (which could because of fear), social learning, exacerbation of anxiety, the basic primitive response of humans are the core factor responsible for the panic buying phenomenon. Further observational, as well as qualitative studies, are warranted to explore the psychological perspective of panic buying behavior during the crisis moments which in turn would help to find out preventive measures during the future moments. We present the possible hypothetical explanations for the behavior to draw the attention of global scientists.

Declaration of Competing Interest

None.
  3 in total

1.  Outburst! A chilling true story about emerging-virus narratives and pandemic social change.

Authors:  H Schell
Journal:  Configurations       Date:  1997

Review 2.  An iatrogenic pandemic of panic.

Authors:  Luc Bonneux; Wim Van Damme
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-04-01

3.  Stockpiling prepandemic influenza vaccines: a new cornerstone of pandemic preparedness plans.

Authors:  Lance C Jennings; Arnold S Monto; Paul K S Chan; Thomas D Szucs; Karl G Nicholson
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 25.071

  3 in total
  25 in total

1.  Early Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Outpatient Neurologic Care in Hawai'i.

Authors:  Julie Crocker; Keke Liu; Maiya Smith; Max Nakamoto; Catherine Mitchell; Ena Zhu; Enze Ma; Frances Tiffany Morden; Ariel Chong; Nicholas Van; Nong Dang; Pat Borman; Enrique Carrazana; Jason Viereck; Kore Kai Liow
Journal:  Hawaii J Health Soc Welf       Date:  2022-01

2.  Psychological Science in the Wake of COVID-19: Social, Methodological, and Metascientific Considerations.

Authors:  Daniel L Rosenfeld; Emily Balcetis; Brock Bastian; Elliot T Berkman; Jennifer K Bosson; Tiffany N Brannon; Anthony L Burrow; C Daryl Cameron; Serena Chen; Jonathan E Cook; Christian Crandall; Shai Davidai; Kristof Dhont; Paul W Eastwick; Sarah E Gaither; Steven W Gangestad; Thomas Gilovich; Kurt Gray; Elizabeth L Haines; Martie G Haselton; Nick Haslam; Gordon Hodson; Michael A Hogg; Matthew J Hornsey; Yuen J Huo; Samantha Joel; Frank J Kachanoff; Gordon Kraft-Todd; Mark R Leary; Alison Ledgerwood; Randy T Lee; Steve Loughnan; Cara C MacInnis; Traci Mann; Damian R Murray; Carolyn Parkinson; Efrén O Pérez; Tom Pyszczynski; Kaylin Ratner; Hank Rothgerber; James D Rounds; Mark Schaller; Roxane Cohen Silver; Barbara A Spellman; Nina Strohminger; Janet K Swim; Felix Thoemmes; Betul Urganci; Joseph A Vandello; Sarah Volz; Vivian Zayas; A Janet Tomiyama
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-10-01

3.  Do open data impact citizens' behavior? Assessing face mask panic buying behaviors during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Yuya Shibuya; Chun-Ming Lai; Andrea Hamm; Soichiro Takagi; Yoshihide Sekimoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Panic buying: An insight from the content analysis of media reports during COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  S M Yasir Arafat; Sujita Kumar Kar; Vikas Menon; Charanya Kaliamoorthy; Srijeeta Mukherjee; Angi Alradie-Mohamed; Pawan Sharma; Marthoenis Marthoenis; Russell Kabir
Journal:  Neurol Psychiatry Brain Res       Date:  2020-07-16

5.  Based on Computational Communication Paradigm: Simulation of Public Opinion Communication Process of Panic Buying During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Qianqian Li; Tinggui Chen; Jianjun Yang; Guodong Cong
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2020-11-20

6.  Characteristics Associated With Self-Reported Worry Among Adults About Food Availability and Food Safety During the COVID-19 Pandemic-United States, June 2020 Survey Data.

Authors:  Brianna L Dumas; Seung Hee Lee; Diane M Harris; Amy L Yaroch; Mary A Pomeroy; Heidi M Blanck
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2021-08-10

7.  Assessing the Aftermath of COVID-19 Outbreak in the Agro-Food System: An Exploratory Study of Experts' Perspectives.

Authors:  Elena Raptou; Konstadinos Mattas; Efthimia Tsakiridou; George Baourakis
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-04-15

8.  COVID-19: Situation of European Countries so Far.

Authors:  Sunitha Pillai; Nazeeba Siddika; Ehsanul Hoque Apu; Russell Kabir
Journal:  Arch Med Res       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 2.235

9.  Responsible Factors of Panic Buying: An Observation From Online Media Reports.

Authors:  S M Yasir Arafat; Sujita Kumar Kar; Vikas Menon; Angi Alradie-Mohamed; Srijeeta Mukherjee; Charanya Kaliamoorthy; Russell Kabir
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-11-05

10.  Effects of COVID-19 on University Student Food Security.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Davitt; Michelle M Heer; Donna M Winham; Simon T Knoblauch; Mack C Shelley
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.