Jian-Yu E1, Aleksandra Mihailovic2, Pei-Lun Kuo1,3, Sheila K West2, David S Friedman4, Laura N Gitlin5, Tianjing Li6, Jennifer A Schrack1,3, Pradeep Y Ramulu1,2,3. 1. Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 2. Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 3. Center on Aging and Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 4. Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 5. College of Nursing and Health Professions, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. 6. Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Fear of falling (FoF) may alter mobility in older adults, especially among those with visual impairment. Using a longitudinal prospective cohort of older glaucoma patients, we investigated whether and how FoF is associated with future falls and physical activity. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Hospital-based single-center recruitment. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals with glaucoma or suspected glaucoma. MEASUREMENTS: FoF was measured annually over a 3-year period using the University of Illinois at Chicago FoF Questionnaire, with lower Rasch-analyzed FoF scores (in logit units) indicating less fear. Participants recorded falls prospectively over the 3-year period using monthly mail-in calendars. Daily steps were collected annually over 7 days using an accelerometer. Visual field (VF) sensitivity was derived by combining sensitivities from monocular VF results. Participants completed questionnaires to determine other demographic/health characteristics. Multivariate random effects models evaluated within-participant changes in fall rates and physical activity across study years. RESULTS: At lower FoF levels (FoF≤0), each one-unit worsening in FoF score across study years was associated with 2.73 times higher odds of reporting at least one fall in the next year (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.55-4.81) but was not associated with average daily steps (P = .44). Similar results were seen when fall rates were normalized by number of steps taken (P = .97). At higher FoF levels (FoF > 0), inter-year changes in FoF scores were not significantly associated with reporting a fall in the following year (P = .78) but were associated with 407 fewer average daily steps per one-unit change in FoF (95% CI = -743 to -71). CONCLUSION: FoF is an important psychological factor associated with mobility in glaucoma patients, although specific aspects of mobility (fall rates vs activity levels) affected vary by the degree of FoF. Our findings suggest that customizing behavioral interventions for older adults based on their levels of FoF may be an important strategy for fall prevention and activity promotion. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1847-1851, 2020.
OBJECTIVE: Fear of falling (FoF) may alter mobility in older adults, especially among those with visual impairment. Using a longitudinal prospective cohort of older glaucomapatients, we investigated whether and how FoF is associated with future falls and physical activity. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Hospital-based single-center recruitment. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals with glaucoma or suspected glaucoma. MEASUREMENTS: FoF was measured annually over a 3-year period using the University of Illinois at Chicago FoF Questionnaire, with lower Rasch-analyzed FoF scores (in logit units) indicating less fear. Participants recorded falls prospectively over the 3-year period using monthly mail-in calendars. Daily steps were collected annually over 7 days using an accelerometer. Visual field (VF) sensitivity was derived by combining sensitivities from monocular VF results. Participants completed questionnaires to determine other demographic/health characteristics. Multivariate random effects models evaluated within-participant changes in fall rates and physical activity across study years. RESULTS: At lower FoF levels (FoF≤0), each one-unit worsening in FoF score across study years was associated with 2.73 times higher odds of reporting at least one fall in the next year (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.55-4.81) but was not associated with average daily steps (P = .44). Similar results were seen when fall rates were normalized by number of steps taken (P = .97). At higher FoF levels (FoF > 0), inter-year changes in FoF scores were not significantly associated with reporting a fall in the following year (P = .78) but were associated with 407 fewer average daily steps per one-unit change in FoF (95% CI = -743 to -71). CONCLUSION: FoF is an important psychological factor associated with mobility in glaucomapatients, although specific aspects of mobility (fall rates vs activity levels) affected vary by the degree of FoF. Our findings suggest that customizing behavioral interventions for older adults based on their levels of FoF may be an important strategy for fall prevention and activity promotion. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1847-1851, 2020.
Authors: Anthony J Nastasi; Alka Ahuja; Vadim Zipunnikov; Eleanor M Simonsick; Luigi Ferrucci; Jennifer A Schrack Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 2.159
Authors: Victoria Hornyak; Jennifer S Brach; David M Wert; Elizabeth Hile; Stephanie Studenski; Jessie M VanSwearingen Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2013-06-28 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Alice C Scheffer; Marieke J Schuurmans; Nynke van Dijk; Truus van der Hooft; Sophia E de Rooij Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Eric S Orwoll; Nora F Fino; Thomas M Gill; Jane A Cauley; Elsa S Strotmeyer; Kristine E Ensrud; Deborah M Kado; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Douglas C Bauer; Peggy M Cawthon; Jodi Lapidus Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2019-08-16 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Angeline M Nguyen; Karun S Arora; Bonnielin K Swenor; David S Friedman; Pradeep Y Ramulu Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2015-06-12 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Barbara J Jefferis; Steve Iliffe; Denise Kendrick; Ngaire Kerse; Stewart Trost; Lucy T Lennon; Sarah Ash; Claudio Sartini; Richard W Morris; S Goya Wannamethee; Peter H Whincup Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2014-10-27 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Heather Waterman; Claire Ballinger; Caroline Brundle; Sebastien Chastin; Heather Gage; Robert Harper; David Henson; Bob Laventure; Lisa McEvoy; Mark Pilling; Nicky Olleveant; Dawn A Skelton; Penelope Stanford; Chris Todd Journal: Trials Date: 2016-09-26 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Yurun Cai; Jennifer A Schrack; Hang Wang; Jian-Yu E; Amal A Wanigatunga; Yuri Agrawal; Jacek K Urbanek; Eleanor M Simonsick; Luigi Ferrucci; Bonnielin K Swenor Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2021-11-15 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Jian-Yu E; Aleksandra Mihailovic; Jennifer A Schrack; Tianjing Li; David S Friedman; Sheila K West; Laura N Gitlin; Pradeep Y Ramulu Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2021-01-08 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Jian-Yu E; Aleksandra Mihailovic; Catalina Garzon; Jennifer A Schrack; Tianjing Li; Sheila K West; David S Friedman; Laura N Gitlin; Pradeep Y Ramulu Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 5.488
Authors: Chase Reuter; John Bellettiere; Sandy Liles; Chongzhi Di; Dorothy D Sears; Michael J LaMonte; Marcia L Stefanick; Andrea Z LaCroix; Loki Natarajan Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2020-07-09 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Catalina Garzon; Aleksandra Mihailovic; E Jian-Yu; Sheila K West; Laura N Gitlin; David S Friedman; Pradeep Y Ramulu Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2022-02-04 Impact factor: 3.921