Literature DB >> 32410177

Morphophenotypic Classification of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: the Biliary/Stem Cell Subgroup and Worst Outcome-Implications on Patient Selection.

Rui Caetano Oliveira1,2,3, Ricardo Martins4,5,6,7,8, Ana Margarida Abrantes4,5, Ângela Jesus9, Paulo Teixeira9, Carolina Canhoto6, Pedro Guerreiro6, Beatriz Costa5,6,7, Mário Rui Silva9, José Guilherme Tralhão6,7,8, Maria Augusta Cipriano9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide and the third cause of cancer-related death. Current clinical/pathological criteria contribute to risk stratification, but are far from the desired on individualized medicine. Recently, HCC classifications have been published based on immunohistochemical and morphological features.
METHODS: A retrospective review of patients submitted to surgical treatment-partial hepatectomy (PH) or liver transplantation (LT), with pathological diagnosis of HCC, in a 9-year period (2007-2015) was performed.
RESULTS: Applying the classification of Srivastava et al. (#1), based on the expression of CD31, p53, AFP and CD44, tumour size and presence of vascular invasion, HCC were categorized as low- and high-risk HCC. With the classification of Tsujikawa et al. (#2), HCC were classified into biliary/stem cell marker positive, Wnt signalling positive and the "all negative" HCC, according to the expression of CK19, SALL4, β-catenin glutamine synthetase, EpCAM and p53. There were sixty-six patients (53 males; 13 females), with median age of 64.5 ± 9.46 years (range 38-86), with solitary HCC, comprehending 37 PH (56.1%) and 29 LT (43.9%). The mean overall survival (OS) was 75.4 ± 6.9 months. Biliary/stem cell type of HCC was a predictive factor of worse OS on the overall population (24.4 versus 78.3 months, p = 0.032) and in PH cohort (11.5 versus 64.01 months, p = 0.016), on uni- and multivariate analyses.
CONCLUSION: These results support the relevance of a risk stratification classification of HCC. Classification #2 seems adequate to our reality demonstrating OS impact, allowing its application in future biopsies, prompting individualized medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hepatocellular carcinoma; Individualized medicine; Morphophenotypic classification; Stem cells

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32410177     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-020-04611-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  43 in total

Review 1.  From NAFLD to NASH and HCC: pathogenetic mechanisms and therapeutic insights.

Authors:  Samuele De Minicis; Chris Day; Gianluca Svegliati-Baroni
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.116

2.  Clinicopathologic features of hepatocellular carcinoma patients with compensated cirrhosis surviving more than 10 years after curative hepatectomy.

Authors:  Saburo Fukuda; Toshiyuki Itamoto; Hironobu Amano; Toshihiko Kohashi; Hideki Ohdan; Hirotaka Tashiro; Toshimasa Asahara
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Human hepatocellular carcinomas with a periportal phenotype have the lowest potential for early recurrence after curative resection.

Authors:  Romain Désert; Florian Rohart; Frédéric Canal; Marie Sicard; Mireille Desille; Stéphanie Renaud; Bruno Turlin; Pascale Bellaud; Christine Perret; Bruno Clément; Kim-Anh Lê Cao; Orlando Musso
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 17.425

4.  Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: the BCLC staging classification.

Authors:  J M Llovet; C Brú; J Bruix
Journal:  Semin Liver Dis       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 6.115

5.  Immunohistochemical molecular analysis indicates hepatocellular carcinoma subgroups that reflect tumor aggressiveness.

Authors:  Hanako Tsujikawa; Yohei Masugi; Ken Yamazaki; Osamu Itano; Yuko Kitagawa; Michiie Sakamoto
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.466

6.  Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.

Authors:  Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 7.  Hepatocellular carcinoma: Review of disease and tumor biomarkers.

Authors:  Jin Un Kim; Mohamed I F Shariff; Mary M E Crossey; Maria Gomez-Romero; Elaine Holmes; I Jane Cox; Haddy K S Fye; Ramou Njie; Simon D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2016-04-08

8.  A morpho-molecular prognostic model for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  S Srivastava; K F Wong; C W Ong; C Y Huak; K G Yeoh; M Teh; J M Luk; M Salto-Tellez
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 9.  Prognostic indicators in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review of 72 studies.

Authors:  Puneeta Tandon; Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 5.828

10.  The Clinicopathologic and Prognostic Significance of Gross Classification on Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Hepatectomy.

Authors:  Jian He; Jiong Shi; Xu Fu; Liang Mao; Tie Zhou; Yudong Qiu; Bin Zhu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.817

View more
  1 in total

1.  Identification and Validation of a Potential Stemness-Associated Biomarker in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yangyang Zhang; Ruike Zhang; Lingxiu Zeng; Haizhou Wang; Ruyi Peng; Meng Zhang; Hailin Zhang; Zhenwei Yang; Liping Gao; Meng Wang; Jing Liu
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 5.131

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.