Literature DB >> 32409523

Spontaneous quantity discrimination of artificial flowers by foraging honeybees.

Scarlett R Howard1,2, Jürgen Schramme3, Jair E Garcia4, Leslie Ng5, Aurore Avarguès-Weber2, Andrew D Greentree6, Adrian G Dyer4,7.   

Abstract

Many animals need to process numerical and quantity information in order to survive. Spontaneous quantity discrimination allows differentiation between two or more quantities without reinforcement or prior training on any numerical task. It is useful for assessing food resources, aggressive interactions, predator avoidance and prey choice. Honeybees have previously demonstrated landmark counting, quantity matching, use of numerical rules, quantity discrimination and arithmetic, but have not been tested for spontaneous quantity discrimination. In bees, spontaneous quantity discrimination could be useful when assessing the quantity of flowers available in a patch and thus maximizing foraging efficiency. In the current study, we assessed the spontaneous quantity discrimination behaviour of honeybees. Bees were trained to associate a single yellow artificial flower with sucrose. Bees were then tested for their ability to discriminate between 13 different quantity comparisons of artificial flowers (numeric ratio range: 0.08-0.8). Bees significantly preferred the higher quantity only in comparisons where '1' was the lower quantity and where there was a sufficient magnitudinal distance between quantities (e.g. 1 versus 12, 1 versus 4, and 1 versus 3 but not 1 versus 2). Our results suggest a possible evolutionary benefit to choosing a foraging patch with a higher quantity of flowers when resources are scarce.
© 2020. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apis mellifera; Approximate number system; Numeric; Object file system; Ratio; Subitizing

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32409523     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.223610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  8 in total

1.  Wild non-eusocial bees learn a colour discrimination task in response to simulated predation events.

Authors:  Scarlett R Howard
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2021-06-21

2.  Non-numerical strategies used by bees to solve numerical cognition tasks.

Authors:  HaDi MaBouDi; Andrew B Barron; Sun Li; Maria Honkanen; Olli J Loukola; Fei Peng; Wenfeng Li; James A R Marshall; Alex Cope; Eleni Vasilaki; Cwyn Solvi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Estimating on the fly: The approximate number system in rufous hummingbirds (Selasphorus rufus).

Authors:  Mia Corliss; Theo Brown; T Andrew Hurly; Susan D Healy; Maria C Tello-Ramos
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Cichlids and stingrays can add and subtract 'one' in the number space from one to five.

Authors:  I M Gosemann; E Schmidt; V Schluessel; N Kreuter
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Does quantity matter to a stingless bee?

Authors:  Johanna Eckert; Manuel Bohn; Johannes Spaethe
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 2.899

6.  Comparative psychophysics of colour preferences in two species of non-eusocial Australian native halictid bees.

Authors:  Scarlett R Howard; Jair E Garcia; Adrian G Dyer
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Magnitude integration in the Archerfish.

Authors:  Tali Leibovich-Raveh; Ashael Raveh; Dana Vilker; Shai Gabay
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Quantitative abilities of invertebrates: a methodological review.

Authors:  Elia Gatto; Olli J Loukola; Christian Agrillo
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 3.084

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.