| Literature DB >> 32409237 |
Andrew S Levey1, Kai-Uwe Eckardt2, Nijsje M Dorman3, Stacy L Christiansen4, Ewout J Hoorn5, Julie R Ingelfinger6, Lesley A Inker7, Adeera Levin8, Rajnish Mehrotra9, Paul M Palevsky10, Mark A Perazella11, Allison Tong12, Susan J Allison13, Detlef Bockenhauer14, Josephine P Briggs15, Jonathan S Bromberg16, Andrew Davenport17, Harold I Feldman18, Denis Fouque19, Ron T Gansevoort20, John S Gill8, Eddie L Greene21, Brenda R Hemmelgarn22, Matthias Kretzler23, Mark Lambie24, Pascale H Lane25, Joseph Laycock26, Shari E Leventhal27, Michael Mittelman28, Patricia Morrissey29, Marlies Ostermann30, Lesley Rees31, Pierre Ronco32, Franz Schaefer33, Jennifer St Clair Russell34, Caroline Vinck35, Stephen B Walsh36, Daniel E Weiner7, Michael Cheung37, Michel Jadoul38, Wolfgang C Winkelmayer39.
Abstract
The worldwide burden of kidney disease is rising, but public awareness remains limited, underscoring the need for more effective communication by stakeholders in the kidney health community. Despite this need for clarity, the nomenclature for describing kidney function and disease lacks uniformity. In June 2019, Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) convened a Consensus Conference with the goal of standardizing and refining the nomenclature used in the English language to describe kidney function and disease, and of developing a glossary that could be used in scientific publications. Guiding principles of the conference were that the revised nomenclature should be patient-centered, precise, and consistent with nomenclature used in the KDIGO guidelines. Conference attendees reached general consensus on the following recommendations: (i) to use "kidney" rather than "renal" or "nephro-" when referring to kidney disease and kidney function; (ii) to use "kidney failure" with appropriate descriptions of presence or absence of symptoms, signs, and treatment, rather than "end-stage kidney disease"; (iii) to use the KDIGO definition and classification of acute kidney diseases and disorders (AKD) and acute kidney injury (AKI), rather than alternative descriptions, to define and classify severity of AKD and AKI; (iv) to use the KDIGO definition and classification of chronic kidney disease (CKD) rather than alternative descriptions to define and classify severity of CKD; and (v) to use specific kidney measures, such as albuminuria or decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR), rather than "abnormal" or "reduced" kidney function to describe alterations in kidney structure and function. A proposed 5-part glossary contains specific items for which there was general agreement. Conference attendees acknowledged limitations of the recommendations and glossary, but they considered standardization of scientific nomenclature to be essential for improving communication.Entities:
Keywords: acute kidney diseases and disorders; acute kidney injury; chronic kidney disease; kidney disease; kidney failure; kidney function; kidney measures; nomenclature; patient-centeredness; precision medicine
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32409237 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2020.02.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Kidney Int ISSN: 0085-2538 Impact factor: 10.612