Literature DB >> 32408166

Using immersive virtual reality to modify body image.

Kamila R Irvine1, Andrew R Irvine2, Nadia Maalin3, Kristofor McCarty4, Katri K Cornelissen4, Martin J Tovée4, Piers L Cornelissen4.   

Abstract

We tested the efficacy of a training programme, delivered in virtual reality (VR), to modify the perceptual boundary between what participants classify as a fat versus a thin body. Three cohorts of 20 female volunteers with high body image concerns were recruited to two intervention groups and one control group. All participants completed a 4-day training programme in VR where they categorised a series of 3D models as either thin or fat; one intervention group was presented with the stimuli briefly, while the other group had no time limits imposed. Both intervention groups were given inflationary feedback to shift their categorisations of the stimulus models towards higher BMIs. Our results show that, compared to controls, both intervention groups shifted their categorical boundaries between Day 1 and follow-up on Day 14. Unlimited stimulus presentation times were associated with a larger training effect. Furthermore, both intervention groups experienced statistically significant reductions in their concerns about their own body shape, weight and eating habits. However, only in the group with longer stimulus presentation times were these reductions consistent with a clinically meaningful effect. These findings suggest that manipulating categorical perception in VR might provide a complementary addition to existing treatments for eating disorders.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anorexia nervosa; body size; body size judgement; categorical perception; virtual reality

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32408166     DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Body Image        ISSN: 1740-1445


  6 in total

1.  Two components of body-image disturbance are differentially associated with distinct eating disorder characteristics in healthy young women.

Authors:  Yumi Hamamoto; Shinsuke Suzuki; Motoaki Sugiura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Drawings or 3D models: Do illustration methods matter when assessing perceived body size and body dissatisfaction?

Authors:  Cynthia Sob; Luana Giacone; Kaspar Staub; Nicole Bender; Michael Siegrist; Christina Hartmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Various Types of Virtual Reality-Based Therapy for Eating Disorders: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Julia Ciążyńska; Janusz Maciaszek
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Views of Practitioners and Researchers on the Use of Virtual Reality in Treatments for Substance Use Disorders.

Authors:  Rigina Skeva; Lynsey Gregg; Caroline Jay; Steve Pettifer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-05-21

5.  Beyond BMI for self-estimates of body size and shape: A new method for developing stimuli correctly calibrated for body composition.

Authors:  Nadia Maalin; Sophie Mohamed; Robin S S Kramer; Piers L Cornelissen; Daniel Martin; Martin J Tovée
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-10-13

Review 6.  Anorexia Nervosa, Body Image Perception and Virtual Reality Therapeutic Applications: State of the Art and Operational Proposal.

Authors:  Massimo Magrini; Olivia Curzio; Marco Tampucci; Gabriele Donzelli; Liliana Cori; Maria Cristina Imiotti; Sandra Maestro; Davide Moroni
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.