Literature DB >> 32405739

Interpregnancy Interval in a Rural Guatemalan Population: Results from a Quality Improvement Database.

Margo S Harrison1,2, Saskia Bunge Montes3, Claudia Rivera3, Amy Nacht4, Andrea Jimenez Zambrano5, Molly Lamb5, Antonio Bolanos3, Edwin Asturias5, Stephen Berman5, Gretchen Heinrichs6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This analysis describes the interpregnancy interval (time from livebirth to subsequent conception) in a convenience sample of women living in Southwest Guatemala and the association of antepartum characteristics and postpartum outcomes with a short interpregnancy interval (< 24 months).
METHODS: This is an observational study of a convenience sample of women enrolled in the Madres Sanas community antenatal/postnatal nursing program supported by the Center for Human Development in Southwest Trifinio, Guatemala, between October 1, 2018 and October 1, 2019. We observed the distribution of interpregnancy intervals among the population of women with a reported date of last live birth, and used bivariate comparisons to compare women with a short interpregnancy interval (< 24 months) to those with an optimal interval ([Formula: see text] 24 months) by antepartum, obstetric and delivery, and postpartum outcomes.
RESULTS: 171 parous women enrolled in the Madres Sanas program between October 1, 2018 and October 1, 2019, and reported the date of their last live birth. One hundred-forty-one (82.5%) women delivered and 130 of those women (92.2%) were seen for their 40-day postpartum visit. The mean interval was 37.1 months with a 22.1-month standard deviation. The median interval was 33.7 months with an interquartile range of 19.6-49.5 months. Among these women, 113 (66.1%) the interpregnancy interval was at least 24 months. The only covariate of all sociodemographic, obstetric and antepartum, delivery, and postpartum characteristics that differed between women who achieved an interval ([Formula: see text] 24 months) compared to those that did not (< 24 months), was age (median 22.9, interquartile range (IQR) [19.1,27.0] vs median 24.8, IQR [21.6,27.9], respectively, p = 0.006). A regression model found that with each increasing year of age, the interpregnancy interval increases by 1.08 months, p = 0.025.
CONCLUSION: Among parous women, two-thirds of women space pregnancies at least 24 months. Older women were more likely to have a longer interval between live births.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Guatemala; Interpregnancy interval; Pregnancy outcomes; Quality improvement

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32405739      PMCID: PMC7329567          DOI: 10.1007/s10995-020-02954-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  7 in total

1.  Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Agustin Conde-Agudelo; Anyeli Rosas-Bermúdez; Ana Cecilia Kafury-Goeta
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Short interpregnancy intervals and adverse pregnancy outcomes by maternal age in the United States.

Authors:  Sarah C Haight; Carol J Hogue; Cheryl L Raskind-Hood; Katherine A Ahrens
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 3.797

3.  A Qualitative Assessment of Community Attitudes and Barriers to Family Planning Use in the Trifinio Region of Southwest Guatemala.

Authors:  Claire Schultz; Nicole Larrea; Marco Celada; Gretchen Heinrichs
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-04

4.  The Center for Human Development in Guatemala: An Innovative Model for Global Population Health.

Authors:  Edwin J Asturias; Gretchen Heinrichs; Gretchen Domek; John Brett; Elizabeth Shick; Maureen Cunningham; Sheana Bull; Marco Celada; Lee S Newman; Liliana Tenney; Lyndsay Krisher; Claudia Luna-Asturias; Kelly McConnell; Stephen Berman
Journal:  Adv Pediatr       Date:  2016-06-03

5.  Effect of the interpregnancy interval on perinatal outcomes in Latin America.

Authors:  Agustin Conde-Agudelo; José M Belizán; Maureen H Norton; Anyeli Rosas-Bermúdez
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Mode of delivery among women with a history of prior cesarean in rural Guatemala: Results from a quality improvement database.

Authors:  Margo S Harrison; Saskia Bunge Montes; Claudia Rivera; Amy Nacht; Andrea Jimenez Zambrano; Molly Lamb; Antonio Bolanos; Edwin Asturias; Stephen Berman; Gretchen Heinrichs
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 2.435

7.  Association of Short Interpregnancy Interval With Pregnancy Outcomes According to Maternal Age.

Authors:  Laura Schummers; Jennifer A Hutcheon; Sonia Hernandez-Diaz; Paige L Williams; Michele R Hacker; Tyler J VanderWeele; Wendy V Norman
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 21.873

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Initial Contraceptive Choices of Women Enrolled in a Cluster-Randomized Trial in Southwest Trifinio, Guatemala.

Authors:  Margo S Harrison; Saskia Bunge-Montes; Claudia Rivera; Andrea Jimenez-Zambrano; Gretchen Heinrichs; Antonio Bolanos; Edwin Asturias; Stephen Berman; Jeanelle Sheeder
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2021-10-28

2.  Twelve-Month outcomes of a Cluster-Randomized Trial of Home-Based Postpartum Contraceptive Delivery in Southwest Trifinio, Guatemala.

Authors:  Margo S Harrison; Saskia Bunge-Montes; Claudia Rivera; Andrea Jimenez-Zambrano; Gretchen Heinrichs; Antonio Bolanos; Edwin Asturias; Stephen Berman; Jeanelle Sheeder
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Res       Date:  2021-04-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.