Literature DB >> 30655034

Short interpregnancy intervals and adverse pregnancy outcomes by maternal age in the United States.

Sarah C Haight1, Carol J Hogue2, Cheryl L Raskind-Hood2, Katherine A Ahrens3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of the article was to examine the association between short interpregnancy intervals and adverse outcomes by maternal age among U.S. women.
METHODS: Using publicly available natality files for 2013-2016 singleton births, we compared the risks of preterm birth, gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, and maternal morbidity (delivery-related complications) for less than 6-month, 6 to 11-month, and 12 to 17-month to 18- to 23-month interpregnancy intervals, overall and by maternal age. Models adjusted for maternal demographics, conditions, and behaviors.
RESULTS: Among 2,365,219 births, adjusted risk ratios (aRR) for preterm birth overall for intervals less than 6, 6-11, and 12-17 months were 1.62 (95% confidence interval: 1.60, 1.65), 1.16 (1.15, 1.18), and 1.03 (1.02, 1.05), respectively, compared with 18-23 months. Intervals less than 6, 6-11, and 12-17 months were significantly protective overall for gestational diabetes (aRR range: 0.89-0.98), gestational hypertension (aRR range: 0.93-0.95), and maternal morbidity (aRR range: 0.93-1.08). All aRRs attenuated or remained flat with increasing maternal age.
CONCLUSION: Interpregnancy intervals less than 18 months showed different patterns of association for preterm birth compared with maternal outcomes, overall and across age. This suggests that increasing maternal age may have discordant effects on associations between short interpregnancy interval and adverse perinatal and maternal outcomes.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Birth intervals; Maternal age; Maternal health; Premature birth

Year:  2018        PMID: 30655034     DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Epidemiol        ISSN: 1047-2797            Impact factor:   3.797


  4 in total

1.  Interpregnancy Interval in a Rural Guatemalan Population: Results from a Quality Improvement Database.

Authors:  Margo S Harrison; Saskia Bunge Montes; Claudia Rivera; Amy Nacht; Andrea Jimenez Zambrano; Molly Lamb; Antonio Bolanos; Edwin Asturias; Stephen Berman; Gretchen Heinrichs
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2020-08

2.  Association of Interpregnancy Interval With Adverse Birth Outcomes.

Authors:  Ting Xu; Huazhang Miao; Yuliang Chen; Limei Luo; Pi Guo; Yingxian Zhu
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-06-01

3.  The confounder matrix: A tool to assess confounding bias in systematic reviews of observational studies of etiology.

Authors:  Julie M Petersen; Malcolm Barrett; Katherine A Ahrens; Eleanor J Murray; Allison S Bryant; Carol J Hogue; Sunni L Mumford; Salini Gadupudi; Matthew P Fox; Ludovic Trinquart
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  The role of intervening pregnancy loss in the association between interpregnancy interval and adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Gizachew A Tessema; Siri E Håberg; Gavin Pereira; Maria C Magnus
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 7.331

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.