Literature DB >> 32404682

Reasons for Revision: Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Mechanisms of Failure.

Grayson Kelmer1, Andrea H Stone, Justin Turcotte, Paul J King.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to examine the major reasons for total hip arthroplasty (THA) failure and temporal patterns in THA revisions.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on 535 revisions performed on 444 THAs from January 2010 to May 2019 at our institution.
RESULTS: The average time to revision THA was 8.51 ± 8.38 years, with 136 cases (30.9%) occurring within 2 years after primary THA. The major mechanisms of failure that resulted in revision surgery were mechanical failure (162, 36.5%), metallosis (95, 21.4%), dislocation or instability (65, 14.6%), periprosthetic fracture (46, 10.4%), infection (44, 9.9%), hematoma or poor wound healing (15, 3.4%), and pain or other (17, 3.8%).
CONCLUSION: Based on our institutional experience over the past decade, mechanical failure without dislocation, metallosis, dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, and infection are typical reasons patients present for primary THA revision. Revisions within 2 years after primary THA are more likely to be the result of infection and periprosthetic fracture. Mechanical failure is the most common reason for revision THA overall, and mechanical failure and metallosis are more likely to be the reason revision is necessary 2 or more years after primary THA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 32404682     DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1067-151X            Impact factor:   3.020


  4 in total

1.  An epidemiological analysis of revision aetiologies in total hip arthroplasty at a single high-volume centre.

Authors:  Benjamin Kerzner; Kyle N Kunze; Michael B O'Sullivan; Karan Pandher; Brett R Levine
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2021-01-03

2.  Contemporary indications for first-time revision surgery after primary cementless total hip arthroplasty with emphasis on early failures.

Authors:  Goro Motomura; Satoshi Hamai; Satoshi Ikemura; Masanori Fujii; Shinya Kawahara; Soichiro Yoshino; Yasuharu Nakashima
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 2.359

3.  TiO2 Nanotubes Promote Osteogenic Differentiation Through Regulation of Yap and Piezo1.

Authors:  Keyu Kong; Yongyun Chang; Yi Hu; Hua Qiao; Chen Zhao; Kewei Rong; Pu Zhang; Jingwei Zhang; Zanjing Zhai; Huiwu Li
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-04-07

4.  A 92 protein inflammation panel performed on sonicate fluid differentiates periprosthetic joint infection from non-infectious causes of arthroplasty failure.

Authors:  Cody R Fisher; Harold I Salmons; Jay Mandrekar; Kerryl E Greenwood-Quaintance; Matthew P Abdel; Robin Patel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 4.996

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.