| Literature DB >> 32403437 |
Bo Yoon Seo1, Eun Young Kim2, Jeong Joon Ahn3, Yonggyun Kim4, Sungtaeg Kang5, Jin Kyo Jung2.
Abstract
We investigated several characteristics of the development and reproduction of the aphid Aulacorthum solani raised on soybean (Glycine max) at 10 constant temperatures between 2.5 and 30 °C, and described the relationship between temperature and several critical biological characteristics using mathematical models. We found that A. solani could survive and reproduce on soybean at temperatures ranging from 5 to 27.5 °C. High fecundity was observed at temperatures from 12.5 to 20 °C. The lower developmental threshold and thermal constant for this species' nymphal stages were estimated to be 5.02 °C and 131.2 degree-days, respectively, using a linear model. The upper developmental threshold was estimated to be 33.9 °C using the Lactin-2 model. The optimum temperature for nymphal development was estimated to be 26.9 °C. The maximum total fecundity was estimated as ca. 76.9 nymphs per adult at 18.1 °C. The daily fecundity sharply increased at earlier adult ages, and slowly decreased thereafter until final parthenogenesis occurred, over a range of temperatures from 12.5 to 25 °C. The maximum daily fecundity was estimated to be ca. 6.1 nymphs per adult per day for a 5.2 day old of adult at 21.3 °C using an age- and temperature-dependent model of adult fecundity. In terms of life table statistics, the intrinsic rates of increase and the finite rate of increase were both highest at 25 °C, while the net reproductive rate was highest at 20 °C.Entities:
Keywords: Aulacorthum solani; Glycine max; development; life table; reproduction; temperature
Year: 2020 PMID: 32403437 PMCID: PMC7291301 DOI: 10.3390/insects11050296
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Insects ISSN: 2075-4450 Impact factor: 2.769
Development duration (days, D) (mean ± SD) and stage-specific mortality (%, M) of Aulacorthum solani nymphs on soybean at constant temperatures.
| Temp (°C) | First Instar | Second Instar | Third Instar | Fourth Instar | Total Nymph | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This Study | This Study | This Study | This Study | This Study | Kim et al. [ | |||||||
| D | M | D | M | D | M | D | M | D | M | D2 | M2 | |
| 2.5 | 16.9 ± 6.2 a 1 | 73.3 | 25.0 ± 16.5 a 1 | 62.5 | - | 100.0 | - | - | - | 100.0 | ||
| 5.0 | 9.3 ± 2.3 b | 3.3 | 12.0 ± 1.3 b | 3.4 | 13.4 ± 1.7 a 1 | 0.0 | 14.3 ± 2.0 a 1 | 3.6 | 48.7 ± 3.4 a 1 | 10.0 | ||
| 7.5 | 8.9 ± 2.2 b | 3.3 | 10.7 ± 1.8 b | 10.3 | 12.0 ± 5.5 a | 3.8 | 12.3 ± 1.6 b | 8.0 | 42.4 ± 5.0 b | 23.3 | ||
| 10.0 | 7.2 ± 1.1 c | 0.0 | 6.7 ± 0.6 c | 3.3 | 6.2 ± 0.4 b | 0.0 | 7.9 ± 0.5 c | 0.0 | 28.0 ± 1.1 c | 3.3 | 20.2 ± 4.5 | 3.0 |
| 12.5 | 4.1 ± 0.5 d | 0.0 | 4.6 ± 0.5 cd | 0.0 | 4.6 ± 0.6 bc | 0.0 | 5.8 ± 0.6 d | 0.0 | 19.2 ± 0.7 d | 0.0 | ||
| 15.0 | 3.2 ± 0.6 de | 0.0 | 3.0 ± 0.3 de | 0.0 | 3.1 ± 0.4 bcd | 0.0 | 3.7 ± 0.5 e | 0.0 | 13.0 ± 0.4 e | 0.0 | 13.4 ± 2.6 | 3.0 |
| 20.0 | 2.2 ± 0.5 ef | 0.0 | 2.1 ± 0.3 e | 0.0 | 2.0 ± 0.3 cd | 0.0 | 2.6 ± 0.5 f | 0.0 | 8.9 ± 0.6 f | 0.0 | 7.8 ± 1.2 | 0.0 |
| 25.0 | 1.7 ± 0.5 f | 0.0 | 1.7 ± 0.5 e | 0.0 | 1.4 ± 0.5 d | 0.0 | 1.8 ± 0.4 g | 0.0 | 6.5 ± 0.6 g | 0.0 | 7.0 ± 1.0 | 0.0 |
| 27.5 | 1.6 ± 0.5 f | 0.0 | 1.4 ± 0.5 e | 0.0 | 1.3 ± 0.5 d | 0.0 | 2.0 ± 0.3 fg | 0.0 | 6.3 ± 0.5 g | 0.0 | ||
| 30.0 | 2.0 ± 0.9 ef | 0.0 | 2.1 ± 0.7 e | 63.3 | 5.0 bc | 90.9 | - | 100.0 | - | 100.0 | - | 100 |
1 Thirty neonate nymphs were treated at various temperatures. Different letters within a column indicate statistically significant difference among means by Tukey’s HSD test at α = 0.05. ANOVA results were F9,266 = 161.47 (p < 0.0001) for 1st instar nymph, F9,237 = 173.47 (p < 0.0001) for 2nd, F8,224 = 145.79 (p < 0.0001) for 3rd, F7,221 = 707.03 (p < 0.0001) for 4th, and F7,221 = 1,741.79 (p < 0.0001) for total nymphal period. 2 These data are from soybean in Kim et al. [2], where 20 nymphs were replicated and Paldalkong cultivar was used.
Developmental duration (days) and fecundity of A. solani adults on soybean at constant temperatures.
| Temp (°C) | Init. No. 1 | Longevity (Day) | Rep. Rate (%) 3 | R. No. | Pre-Reproductive Period (Day) | Reproductive Period (Day) | Total Fecundity (No.) | Daily Fecundity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This Study | Kim et al. [ | This Study | This Study | This Study | Kim et al. [ | This Study | Kim et al. [ | This Study | |||
| 5.0 | 27 | 52.9 ± 30.1 b5 | 92.6 | 25 | 17.4 ± 2.7 a | 22.4 ± 12.1 b | 11.8 ± 5.8 ef | 0.6 ± 0.2 d | |||
| 7.5 | 23 | 67.0 ± 25.3 a | 82.6 | 19 | 12.8 ± 1.4 b | 45.9 ± 19.4 a | 27.8 ± 12.4 d | 0.6 ± 0.2 d | |||
| 10.0 | 29 | 53.2 ± 17.8 b | 52.6 ± 26.7 | 100.0 | 29 | 7.1 ± 0.8 c | 24.5 ± 9.6 b | 34.8 ± 10.4 | 19.4 ± 5.2 de | 41.8 ± 23.6 | 0.9 ± 0.3 d |
| 12.5 | 30 | 65.1 ± 20.4 ab | 100.0 | 30 | 4.6 ± 0.6 d | 46.0 ± 12.6 a | 73.5 ± 12.9 ab | 1.7 ± 0.3 c | |||
| 15.0 | 30 | 33.3 ± 14.3 c | 42.4 ± 21.4 | 100.0 | 30 | 2.6 ± 0.5 e | 28.4 ± 11.9 b | 28.7 ± 8.3 | 65.4 ± 20.9 b | 58.9 ± 25.7 | 2.4 ± 0.4 b |
| 20.0 | 30 | 28.9 ± 9.0 c | 31.4 ± 12.5 | 100.0 | 30 | 1.8 ± 0.4 ef | 21.7 ± 5.9 b | 26.4 ± 5.2 | 78.3 ± 14.6 a | 78.9 ± 19.4 | 3.8 ± 0.6 a |
| 25.0 | 30 | 14.2 ± 7.1 d | 28.2 ± 4.3 | 100.0 | 30 | 1.3 ± 0.5 f | 12.4 ± 6.3 c | 23.8 ± 3.6 | 42.5 ± 18.8 c | 83.0 ± 21.5 | 3.6 ± 0.7 a |
| 27.5 | 30 | 11.5 ± 6.0 d | 93.3 | 28 | 2.5 ± 0.6 e | 7.3 ± 3.6 cd | 16.9 ± 9.3 de | 2.3 ± 0.8 b | |||
| 30.0 2 | 30 | 3.7 ± 1.3 d | 13.3 ± 5.7 | 80.0 | 24 | 1.5 ± 0.6 f | 2.6 ± 1.2 d | 11.2 ± 6.1 | 4.4 ± 2.3 f | 25.4 ± 14.8 | 1.7 ± 0.5 c |
| 35.0 | 4.2 ± 2.1 | 2.3 ± 1.8 | 2.5 ± 1.7 | ||||||||
1 Initial number means the number of adults that emerged from nymphal stage. 2 The adults at 30 °C were treated separately without examination of their nymphal stages. 3 Reproductive rate was calculated as the percentage of the initial number of adults that produced progeny. 4 These data are from soybean in Kim et al. [2], in which 20 adults were replicated and Paldalkong cultivar was used. 5 Different letters within a column indicate statistically significant difference among means by Tukey’s HSD test at α = 0.05. ANOVA results were F8,250 = 58.09 (p < 0.0001) for longevity, F8,236 = 677.57 (p < 0.0001) for pre-reproductive period, F8,236 = 57.93 (p < 0.0001) for reproductive period, F8,236 = 128.48 (p < 0.0001) for total fecundity, and F8,236 = 158.57 (p < 0.0001) for daily fecundity during reproductive period.
Parameters and values derived from the development rate models and the distribution model for A. solani nymphs in Figure 1.
| Model | Parameters and Derived Estimates |
|
|---|---|---|
| Developmental rate Linear (Equation (1)) | 0.99 | |
| Lactin-2 (Equation (2)) | 0.99 | |
| Weibull distribution (Equation (3)) | 0.90 |
ANOVA results were F1,4 = 857.0 (p < 0.0001) for the linear model, F3,4 = 448.7 (p < 0.0001) for the Lactin-2 model, and F1,40 = 365.0 (p < 0.0001) for the Weibull distribution model. Abbreviations: LDT, lower development threshold; DD, degree-days; UDT, upper development threshold; radj2, adjusted r square value.
Figure 1Observed values of development rates at constant temperatures and estimated linear (Equation (1)) and nonlinear Lactin-2 model (Equation (2)) curves between temperature and development rates (A), and Weibull distribution curve (Equation (3)) for development completion (B) in A. solani nymphs.
Parameters and values derived from the linear and nonlinear temperature-dependent development models in separate instars of A. solani nymphs.
| Model | Parameters and Derived Values | First Instar | Second Instar | Third Instar | Fourth Instar |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linear | 0.03351 ± 0.00093 | 0.03579 ± 0.00151 | 0.04072 ± 0.00336 | 0.0298 ± 0.00178 | |
| −0.18052 ± 0.01608 | −0.20268 ± 0.02740 | −0.25756 ± 0.05424 | −0.1702 ± 0.02871 | ||
| Temp. range(°C) | 10.0–25.0 | 7.5–27.5 | 7.5–25.0 | 7.5–25.0 | |
| LDT and DD | 5.39, 29.8 | 5.66, 27.9 | 6.32, 24.6 | 5.70, 33.5 | |
|
| 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.98 | |
| ANOVA | |||||
| Lactin-2 |
| 0.14597 ± 0.01197 | 0.18764 ± 0.02063 | 0.23443 ± 0.01455 | 0.19659 ± 0.02063 |
| 33.78729 ± 0.60461 | 32.08891 ± 0.51063 | 30.30548 ± 0.11484 | 30.34261 ± 0.60381 | ||
|
| 6.75625 ± 0.52066 | 5.30357 ± 0.56751 | 4.25799 ± 0.26086 | 5.06637 ± 0.52048 | |
|
| −0.024430 ± 0.03485 | 0.02808 ± 0.04283 | 0.06220 ± 0.03000 | 0.01504 ± 0.03185 | |
| LDT | −8.36 | - 1 | - 1 | - 1 | |
|
| 27.03 | 26.79 | 26.05 | 25.28 | |
|
| 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.99 | |
| ANOVA | |||||
| Weibull |
| 0.96899 ± 0.01653 | 0.94956 ± 0.01867 | 0.91102 ± 0.02093 | 0.96280 ± 0.00995 |
| distribution |
| 3.91272 ± 0.38530 | 7.50896 ± 1.75786 | 5.59675 ± 1.07504 | 10.54906 ± 1.46181 |
|
| 0.89 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.90 | |
| ANOVA |
1 The parameters could not be calculated. Abbreviation: Topt, optimal temperature.
Several models and their parameters for A. solani adults in Figure 3.
| Model | Parameters |
|
|---|---|---|
| Aging rate (Equation (4)) | 0.88 | |
| Total fecundity (Equation (5)) | 0.74 | |
| Survival ratio (Equation (6)) | 0.92 | |
| Cumulative fecundity ratio (Equation (3)) | 0.91 |
ANOVA results were F1,7 = 70.96 (p < 0.0001) for aging rate, F3,5 = 11.17 (p = 0.0177) for total fecundity, F1,174 = 1949.19 (p < 0.0001) for survival ratio, and F1,566 = 5751.26 (p < 0.0001) for cumulative fecundity ratio.
Figure 2Observed values of the aging rate (A), total fecundity (B), cumulative survival ratio (C), and cumulative fecundity ratio (D), and curves estimated from their generalized models (Equation (4), Equation (5), Equation (6), Equation (3)) in A. solani adults.
Figure 3The age-specific survival rate (l), the age-specific fecundity (m), and the age-specific maternity (l) of A. solani in response to different temperature conditions.
Parameters estimated from the daily fecundity model (Equation (7)) of A. solani adults at constant temperatures.
| Temp (°C) |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.0 | 18.12654 ± 1.31138 | 3.98639 ± 0.68477 | 0.05573 ± 0.00382 | 0.58 |
| 7.5 | 31.87245 ± 1.52136 | 3.74750 ± 0.60615 | 0.04654 ± 0.00221 | 0.70 |
| 10.0 | 22.88171 ± 1.72476 | 1.52812 ± 0.33140 | 0.12175 ± 0.00871 | 0.66 |
| 12.5 | 83.24260 ± 1.99011 | 1.21637 ± 0.20426 | 0.08076 ± 0.00201 | 0.93 |
| 15.0 | 83.47867 ± 2.64907 | 0.22761 ± 0.24133 | 0.10680 ± 0.00374 | 0.91 |
| 20.0 | 88.53896 ± 3.64552 | 0.18145 ± 0.17975 | 0.17008 ± 0.00750 | 0.91 |
| 25.0 | 57.06038 ± 2.09382 | −0.04473 ± 0.12002 | 0.23537 ± 0.00946 | 0.94 |
| 27.5 | 22.04102 ± 1.87325 | 0.30660 ± 0.15650 | 0.30116 ± 0.02514 | 0.81 |
| 30.0 | 4.90767 ± 0.85356 | 0.00785 ± 0.13275 | 0.64841 ± 0.12095 | 0.61 |
ANOVA results were F2,107 = 76.82 (p < 0.0001) for 5 °C, F2,125 = 148.62 (p < 0.0001) for 7.5 °C, F2,85 = 88.41 (p < 0.0001) for 10 °C, F2,86 = 627.95 (p < 0.0001) for 12.5 °C, F2,52 = 263.86 (p < 0.0001) for 15 °C, F2,38 = 208.32 (p < 0.0001) for 20 °C, F2,22 = 197.73 (p < 0.0001) for 25 °C, F2,22 = 56.01 (p < 0.0001) for 27.5 °C, and F2,4 = 8.32 (p = 0.0375) for 30 °C.
Parameters estimated from the age- and temperature-dependent daily fecundity model (Equation (8)) of A. solani adults.
| Parameter Estimates |
|
|---|---|
| 0.90 |
ANOVA result is F5,562 = 981.4 (p < 0.0001).
Life table parameters of A. solani at different constant temperatures using traditional age-specific life table analysis.
| Temp. (°C) |
| G (Day) | λ | DT (Day) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.0 | 0.0297 | 9.61 | 76.29 | 1.03 | 23.37 |
| 7.5 | 0.0405 | 18.51 | 72.08 | 1.04 | 17.12 |
| 10.0 | 0.0699 | 18.71 | 41.91 | 1.07 | 9.92 |
| 12.5 | 0.1226 | 73.19 | 35.02 | 1.13 | 5.65 |
| 15.0 | 0.1813 | 64.21 | 22.95 | 1.20 | 3.82 |
| 20.0 | 0.2774 | 77.49 | 15.68 | 1.32 | 2.50 |
| 25.0 | 0.3349 | 40.67 | 11.06 | 1.40 | 2.07 |
| 27.5 | 0.2489 | 14.79 | 10.82 | 1.28 | 2.79 |
rm: intrinsic rate of increase, R0: net reproductive rate in numbers, G: generation time in days, λ: finite rate of increase, and DT: doubling time of population in days.
Life table parameters of A. solani at different constant temperatures using age–stage, two-sex life table analysis.
| Temp. (°C) |
| G (Day) | λ | DT (Day) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.0 | 0.0307 h | 10.51 e | 76.36 a | 1.03 h | 22.61 a |
| 7.5 | 0.0402 g | 18.17 d | 71.85 b | 1.04 g | 17.32 b |
| 10.0 | 0.0689 f | 17.68 d | 41.66 c | 1.07 f | 10.06 c |
| 12.5 | 0.1226 e | 73.56 ab | 35.05 d | 1.13 e | 5.65 d |
| 15.0 | 0.1827 d | 65.29 b | 22.86 e | 1.20 d | 3.79 e |
| 20.0 | 0.2774 b | 78.34 a | 15.72 f | 1.32 b | 2.50 g |
| 25.0 | 0.3377 a | 42.52 c | 11.09 g | 1.40 a | 2.05 h |
| 27.5 | 0.2534 c | 15.79 d | 10.87 g | 1.28 c | 2.74 f |
rm: intrinsic rate of increase, R0: net reproductive rate in numbers, G: generation time in days, λ: finite rate of increase, and DT: doubling time of population in days. Means in the same row followed by different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05), as determined by the paired bootstrap test.
Figure 4The population growth projection of A. solani in response to different temperature conditions, beginning with an initial population of newly born 10 nymphs.