| Literature DB >> 35447775 |
Xue-Mei Li1, Mu-Hua Zhao1, Feng Huang2, Fang-Ge Shang1, Yun-Hui Zhang1, Cheng-Min Liu1, Shuai-Jie He1, Gang Wu1.
Abstract
To assess the effect of elevated CO2 on the development, fecundity, and population dynamic parameters of L. erysimi, the age-stage, two-sex life table was used to predict the individual fitness and population parameters of three successive generations of L. erysimi in this study. The results show that a significantly longer total pre-adult stage before oviposition (TPOP) was observed in the third generation compared with the first generation of L. erysimi under the 800 μL/L CO2 treatment. The fecundity is significantly lower in the 800 μL/L CO2 treatment than that in the 400 μL/L CO2 treatment in the third generation of L. erysimi, which indicates that elevated CO2 had a negative effect on the individual fitness parameters of L. erysimi. Additionally, the life expectancy (exj) is significantly lower under the 800 μL/L CO2 treatment than that under the 400 μL/L CO2 treatment in the three successive generations. A significantly higher intrinsic rate of increase (r) and finite rate of increase (λ) were found in the second generation compared with those in the first and third generations of L. erysimi under the 800 μL/L CO2 treatment. Moreover, significantly lower r and λ were observed under the 800 μL/L CO2 treatment compared with those under the 400 μL/L and 600 μL/L CO2 treatments in the first generation of L. erysimi, which indicates that elevated CO2 has a short-term effect on the population parameters (r and λ) of L. erysimi. Our experiment can provide the data for the comprehensive prevention and control of L. erysimi in the future with increasing CO2 levels.Entities:
Keywords: Lipaphis erysimi; elevated CO2; fecundity; intrinsic rate of increase; two-sex life table
Year: 2022 PMID: 35447775 PMCID: PMC9031089 DOI: 10.3390/insects13040333
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Insects ISSN: 2075-4450 Impact factor: 3.139
Life history parameters of three successive generations of L. erysimi under three CO2 treatments (mean ± SE).
| Life History Parameters | 400 μL/L | 600 μL/L | 800 μL/L | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gen 1 | Gen 2 | Gen 3 | Gen 1 | Gen 2 | Gen 3 | Gen 1 | Gen 2 | Gen 3 | |
| 1st instar (d) | 1.26 ± 0.05 bA | 1.32 ± 0.06 aA | 1.33 ± 0.06 aA | 1.57 ± 0.06 aA | 1.27 ± 0.06 aB | 1.38 ± 0.06 aB | 1.64 ± 0.06 aA | 1.32 ± 0.06 aB | 1.48 ± 0.06 aAB |
| 2nd instar (d) | 1.14 ± 0.04 aB | 1.05 ± 0.03 cB | 1.32 ± 0.06 abA | 1.10 ± 0.04 aA | 1.22 ± 0.05 bA | 1.20 ± 0.05 bA | 1.14 ± 0.05 aB | 1.47 ± 0.06 aA | 1.45 ± 0.07 aA |
| 3rd instar (d) | 1.10 ± 0.04 aA | 1.15 ± 0.05 aA | 1.21 ± 0.05 bA | 1.22 ± 0.05 aB | 1.25 ± 0.06 aB | 1.44 ± 0.07 aA | 1.13 ± 0.05 aB | 1.29 ± 0.06 aA | 1.17 ± 0.05 bAB |
| 4th instar (d) | 1.70 ± 0.06 aA | 1.48 ± 0.06 aB | 1.33 ± 0.06 bB | 1.34 ± 0.06 bA | 1.38 ± 0.06 aA | 1.24 ± 0.06 bA | 1.54 ± 0.07 aA | 1.15 ± 0.05 bB | 1.57 ± 0.08 aA |
| APOP (d) | 0.20 ± 0.05 aB | 0.37 ± 0.06 aA | 0.43 ± 0.06 aA | 0.14 ± 0.04 aAB | 0.05 ± 0.03 bB | 0.28 ± 0.06 aA | 0.07 ± 0.03 bB | 0.42 ± 0.06 aA | 0.34 ± 0.07 aA |
| TPOP (d) | 5.38 ± 0.07 aB | 5.37 ± 0.08 bB | 5.62 ± 0.07 abA | 5.36 ± 0.09 aA | 5.14 ± 0.06 cB | 5.57 ± 0.08 bA | 5.52 ± 0.09 aB | 5.64 ± 0.06 aAB | 5.90 ± 0.13 aA |
| Fecundity | 100.6 ± 3.5 aA | 101.4 ± 3.6 aA | 100.6 ± 3.8 aA | 102.0 ± 2.6 aA | 96.5 ± 4.4 aA | 106.2 ± 4.0 aA | 83.2 ± 5.5 bAB | 94.3 ± 4.1 aA | 79.8 ± 5.6 bB |
| Adult longevity (d) | 19.3 ± 0.8 aA | 18.0 ± 0.9 aA | 18.8 ± 0.9 aA | 17.7 ± 0.7 aA | 17.0 ± 0.9 aA | 18.7 ± 0.8 aA | 14.9 ± 1.1 bAB | 15.8 ± 0.9 aA | 13.0 ± 1.0 bB |
| Survival rate (%) | 0.92 ± 0.03 abB | 1.00 ± 0.00 aA | 0.97 ± 0.02 aAB | 0.98 ± 0.02 aA | 1.00 ± 0.00 aA | 0.90 ± 0.04 aB | 0.90 ± 0.04 bB | 0.98 ± 0.02 aA | 0.73 ± 0.06 bC |
Note: Standard errors were analyzed by using 100,000 bootstraps. Means followed by lowercase letters indicate significant differences among three CO2 treatments within the same generation (p < 0.05). Means followed by different uppercase letters indicate significant differences among three generations within the same CO2 treatment (p < 0.05). APOP: the pre-oviposition period based on the adult stage. TPOP: the total pre-adult stage before oviposition.
Figure 1Age-stage-specific survival rates (s) of three successive generations of L. erysimi under three CO2 treatments.
Figure 2Age-stage-specific reproductive value (v) of three successive generations of L. erysimi under three CO2 treatments.
Figure 3Age-specific survival rate (l) (left y-axis), age-stage-specific fecundity (f(x, female)) (right y-axis), age-specific fecundity (m) (right y-axis), and age-specific maternity (l) (right y-axis) of three successive generations of L. erysimi under three CO2 treatments.
Figure 4Age-stage-specific life expectancy (e) of three successive generations of L. erysimi under three CO2 treatments.
Population parameters of successive three generations of L. erysimi under three CO2 treatments (mean ± SE).
| Generations | Population Parameters | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intrinsic Rate of Increase ( | Finite Rate of Increase ( | Net Reproductive Rate ( | Mean Generation Time ( | ||
| 400 μL/L | Gen 1 | 0.4744 ± 0.0076 aA | 1.6071 ± 0.0123 aA | 92.80 ± 4.63 aA | 9.55 ± 0.11 aB |
| Gen 2 | 0.4926 ± 0.0054 aA | 1.6365 ± 0.0088 aA | 101.42 ± 3.59 aA | 9.38 ± 0.10 aB | |
| Gen 3 | 0.4552 ± 0.0052 aB | 1.5766 ± 0.0081 aB | 97.28 ± 4.37 aA | 10.06 ± 0.10 aA | |
| 600 μL/L | Gen 1 | 0.4763 ± 0.0057 aA | 1.6102 ± 0.0092 aA | 100.27 ± 3.07 aA | 9.67 ± 0.11 aB |
| Gen 2 | 0.4832 ± 0.0047 abA | 1.6213 ± 0.0076 abA | 96.52 ± 4.43 aA | 9.46 ± 0.10 aB | |
| Gen 3 | 0.4573 ± 0.0067 aB | 1.5799 ± 0.0105 aB | 95.58 ± 5.44 aA | 9.97 ± 0.08 aA | |
| 800 μL/L | Gen 1 | 0.4395 ± 0.0085 bB | 1.5519 ± 0.0131 bB | 75.06 ± 5.91 bB | 9.81 ± 0.12 aAB |
| Gen 2 | 0.4742 ± 0.0039 bA | 1.6068 ± 0.0063 bA | 92.70 ± 4.30 aA | 9.55 ± 0.09 aB | |
| Gen 3 | 0.4055 ± 0.0124 bC | 1.500 ± 0.0185 bC | 58.53 ± 6.10 bB | 10.02 ± 0.14 aA | |
Note: Means followed by lowercase letters indicate significant differences among three CO2 treatments within the same generation (p < 0.05). Means followed by different uppercase letters indicate significant differences among three generations within the same CO2 treatment (p < 0.05).