| Literature DB >> 32403298 |
Xinshuai Zhang1, Yao Ruan1, Wukang Liu1, Qian Chen1, Lihong Gu1, Ailing Guo1,2.
Abstract
Lysozyme acts as a kind of cationic antimicrobial protein and effectively hydrolyzes bacterial peptidoglycan to have a bactericidal effect, which also plays an important role in protecting eggs from microbial contamination. Dermacoccus abyssi HZAU 226, a Gram-positive bacterium isolated from spoiled eggs, has egg white and lysozyme tolerance, but its survival mechanism is unknown, especially from a transcriptomics point of view. In this study, the high lysozyme tolerance of D. abyssi HZAU 226 was characterized by three independent experiments, and then the Illumina RNA-seq was used to compare the transcriptional profiles of this strain in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium with and without 5 mg/mL lysozyme to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs); 1024 DEGs were identified by expression analysis, including 544 up-regulated genes and 480 down-regulated genes in response to lysozyme treatment. The functional annotation analysis results of DEGs showed that these genes were mainly involved in glutathione biosynthesis and metabolism, ion transport, energy metabolism pathways, and peptidoglycan biosynthesis. This study is the first report of bacterial-related lysozyme RNA-seq, and our results help in understanding the lysozyme-tolerance mechanism of bacteria from a new perspective and provide transcriptome resources for subsequent research in related fields.Entities:
Keywords: Dermacoccus abyssi HZAU 226; RNA-seq; lysozyme treatment; tolerance mechanism
Year: 2020 PMID: 32403298 PMCID: PMC7286019 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8050707
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Figure 1(A) The survival curve of D. abyssi HZAU 226 and S. aureus ATCC 27,217 in Luria–Bertani (LB) medium with and without 5 mg/mL lysozyme. Data were obtained from two independent experiments using triplicate samples per each experiment via plate counts at different time points; (B) a and b were the lysozyme inhibition zone test of D. abyssi HZAU 226 and S. aureus ATCC 27217. The concentration of lysozyme in pores 1–5 were 1.5 mg/mL, 3.5 mg/mL, 5.5 mg/mL, 7.5 mg/mL and 10 mg/mL respectively, and central pore was saline control; (C) Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of lysozyme treatment. Note: control group: a (S. aureus) and c (D. abyssi); experimental group: b (S. aureus) and d (D. abyssi).
Data quality statistics and reference sequence matching after filtering.
| Sample | Sample Description | Total Reads | Bases | Q20 1 (%) | Q30 2 (%) | GC 3 (%) | Total Mapped |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK1 | Control replication 1 | 33,366,114 | 4,934,245,447 | 96.80 | 91.36 | 67.43 | 31,528,403 (94.4923%) |
| CK2 | Control replication 2 | 33,483,220 | 4,948,473,732 | 96.61 | 90.91 | 67.29 | 31,529,020 (94.1636%) |
| CK3 | Control replication 3 | 34,522,436 | 5,128,803,026 | 97.78 | 93.92 | 67.40 | 32,692,711 (94.6999%) |
| UV1 | Lysozyme treatment replication 1 | 56,645,366 | 8,421,131,651 | 98.17 | 94.79 | 66.31 | 51,680,501 (91.2352%) |
| UV2 | Lysozyme treatment replication 2 | 45,945,296 | 6,769,856,909 | 96.53 | 90.80 | 64.46 | 39,814,219 (86.6557%) |
| UV3 | Lysozyme treatment replication 3 | 38,707,694 | 5,712,404,289 | 96.60 | 90.93 | 64.77 | 33,415,978 (86.3290%) |
1 Percentage of bases with a Phred value of at least 20. 2 Percentage of bases with a Phred value of at least 30. 3 Total number of bases G and C as a percentage of total number of bases.
Figure 2Heatmap diagrams showed the relative expression levels of total differentially expressed genes (DEGs) among the two treatments. Note: CK: LB medium without lysozyme; UV: LB medium with lysozyme.
Figure 3Gene Ontology (GO) analysis of DEGs in three main categories.
Figure 4Cluster of Orthologous Groups of proteins (COG) analysis of DEGs between CK and lysozyme treatments.
Figure 5Scatter plot of Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment for DEGs. Rich factor referred to the ratio of the number of genes annotated to the pathway in the DEGs to the total number of genes located at the pathway among all annotated genes.
Figure 6Glutathione biosynthesis and metabolism.
Figure 7Energy metabolism pathway.