Literature DB >> 32402335

Immune response and protective efficacy of intramuscular and intradermal vaccination with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus 1 (PRRSV-1) modified live vaccine against highly pathogenic PRRSV-2 (HP-PRRSV-2) challenge, either alone or in combination with of PRRSV-1.

Adthakorn Madapong1, Kepalee Saeng-Chuto1, Puwich Chaikhumwang2, Angkana Tantituvanont2, Kriangsak Saardrak3, Rafael Pedrazuela Sanz4, Joel Miranda Alvarez4, Dachrit Nilubol5.   

Abstract

The study was conducted to evaluate the immune response of pigs vaccinated intramuscularly (IM) or intradermally (ID) with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus 1 (PRRSV-1) modified live vaccine (MLV). The protective efficacy was evaluated upon challenge with highly pathogenic (HP)-PRRSV-2, either alone or in combination with PRRSV-1. Forty-two, castrated male, PRRSV-free pigs were randomly allocated into 7 groups of 6 pig each. IM/HPPRRSV2, IM/CoChallenge, ID/HPPRRSV2 and ID/CoChallenge groups were vaccinated IM or ID with PRRSV-1 MLV (UNISTRAIN® PRRS, Laboratorios Hipra S.A., Amer, Spain) in accordance to the manufacturer's directions. NV/HPPRRSV2 and NoVac/CoChallenge groups were nonvaccinated/challenged controls. NoVac/NoChallenge group was left as the control. Antibody response, IFN-γ-secreting cells (IFN-γ-SC) and IL-10 production were evaluated following vaccination. At 35 days post vaccination (DPV), all challenged groups were intranasally inoculated with HP-PRRSV-2, either alone or in combination with PRRSV-1. PRRSV viremia and lung lesion scores were evaluated following challenge. The results demonstrated that ID vaccinated pigs had significantly lower IL-10 levels and higher IFN-γ-SC than that of IM vaccinated pigs. Following challenge with HP-PRRSV-2 either alone or with PRRSV-1, PRRSV viremia and lung lesions, both macroscopically and microscopically, were significantly reduced in vaccinated pigs than that of nonvaccinated pigs, regardless to the route of vaccine administration. ID vaccinated pigs had significantly lower levels of PRRSV viremia and lung lesion scores than that of IM vaccinated pigs. The results of the study suggested that the administration of PRRSV-1 MLV, either IM or ID, provided partial protection against HP-PRRSV-2, either alone or when cochallenged with PRRSV-1, as demonstrated by the reduction in lung lesions and viremia. The ID route might represent an alternative to improve vaccine efficacy, as it resulted in lower IL-10 levels and higher IFN-γ-SC levels.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Challenge; Immune response; Intradermal; Intramuscular; Modified live virus vaccine; Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus; Protective efficacy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32402335     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2020.108655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Microbiol        ISSN: 0378-1135            Impact factor:   3.293


  6 in total

1.  Booster administration can make a difference in the antibody response to intradermal foot-and-mouth disease vaccination in cattle.

Authors:  Can Çokçalışkan; Pelin Tuncer-Göktuna; Beyhan Sareyyüpoğlu; Tunçer Türkoğlu; Muhammet Yıldız; M Nuri Fırat Deveci; Eylem Aras-Uzun; Abdullah Arslan; Ayça Kürkçü; Ergün Uzunlu; Erdoğan Asar
Journal:  Arch Virol       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 2.574

2.  Intranasal delivery of inactivated PRRSV loaded cationic nanoparticles coupled with enterotoxin subunit B induces PRRSV-specific immune responses in pigs.

Authors:  Puwich Chaikhumwang; Adthakorn Madapong; Kepalee Saeng-Chuto; Dachrit Nilubol; Angkana Tantituvanont
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Safety of PRRSV-2 MLV vaccines administrated via the intramuscular or intradermal route and evaluation of PRRSV transmission upon needle-free and needle delivery.

Authors:  Adthakorn Madapong; Kepalee Saeng-Chuto; Angkana Tantituvanont; Dachrit Nilubol
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Using a concurrent challenge with porcine circovirus 2 and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus to compare swine vaccination programs.

Authors:  Adthakorn Madapong; Kepalee Saeng-Chuto; Angkana Tantituvanont; Dachrit Nilubol
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Angiotensin II Blood Serum Levels in Piglets, after Intra-Dermal or Intra-Muscular Vaccination against PRRSV.

Authors:  Georgios Maragkakis; Labrini V Athanasiou; Laskarina-Maria Korou; Serafeim C Chaintoutis; Chrysostomos Dovas; Despina N Perrea; Georgios Papakonstantinou; Georgios Christodoulopoulos; Dominiek Maes; Vasileios G Papatsiros
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2022-09-11

6.  miRNA let-7 family regulated by NEAT1 and ARID3A/NF-κB inhibits PRRSV-2 replication in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Xiangbin You; Min Liu; Qian Liu; Huijuan Li; Yilin Qu; Xiaoxiao Gao; Chengyu Huang; Gan Luo; Gang Cao; Dequan Xu
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 7.464

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.