Literature DB >> 35034176

Booster administration can make a difference in the antibody response to intradermal foot-and-mouth disease vaccination in cattle.

Can Çokçalışkan1, Pelin Tuncer-Göktuna2, Beyhan Sareyyüpoğlu3, Tunçer Türkoğlu3, Muhammet Yıldız4, M Nuri Fırat Deveci4, Eylem Aras-Uzun3, Abdullah Arslan3, Ayça Kürkçü3, Ergün Uzunlu3, Erdoğan Asar5.   

Abstract

Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is a highly contagious and economically important viral disease of cloven-hoofed animals. Routine vaccination is one of the preferred methods of protection against this disease in endemic countries. For protective immunity against FMD, repeated immunizations with frequent administration are required. Intradermal immunization has many advantages over intramuscular administration of vaccines. In this study, a commercial tetravalent FMD vaccine adjuvanted with Montanide ISA 206 was administered to cattle via the intramuscular (2 mL [n = 10] and 0.5 mL [n = 9]) and intradermal (0.5 mL [n = 11]) routes. Booster doses were administered 28 days later using the same vaccine and routes. Serum samples were collected on days 0, 7, 14, and 28 post-vaccination (pv) and at 30 and 60 days post-booster. Homologous and heterologous virus neutralization tests and liquid-phase blocking and isotype ELISAs were used to measure the antibody response. The results showed that intradermal administration of quarter doses of the vaccine provides an equal or better virus neutralization antibody response than intramuscular administration of the same dose of vaccine after booster administration in cattle. This means that four times more cattle can be immunized with the same amount of vaccine using the intradermal route without compromising immunity.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35034176     DOI: 10.1007/s00705-021-05273-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Virol        ISSN: 0304-8608            Impact factor:   2.574


  18 in total

Review 1.  Efficacy of intradermal vaccination.

Authors:  B D Hunsaker; L J Perino
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  2001-05-10       Impact factor: 2.046

2.  Modes of vaccine administration at a glance.

Authors:  Birgit Makoschey
Journal:  Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.328

3.  Intradermal vaccination of pigs against FMD with 1/10 dose results in comparable vaccine efficacy as intramuscular vaccination with a full dose.

Authors:  P L Eblé; K Weerdmeester; F van Hemert-Kluitenberg; A Dekker
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2008-12-27       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  The effect of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) vaccination on virus transmission and the significance for the field.

Authors:  Karin Orsel; Annemarie Bouma
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.008

5.  No significant differences in the breadth of the foot-and-mouth disease serotype A vaccine induced antibody responses in cattle, using different adjuvants, mixed antigens and different routes of administration.

Authors:  Tesfaalem Tekleghiorghis; Klaas Weerdmeester; Froukje van Hemert-Kluitenberg; Rob J M Moormann; Aldo Dekker
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 6.  Estimating the protection afforded by foot-and-mouth disease vaccines in the laboratory.

Authors:  D J Paton; R Reeve; A V Capozzo; A Ludi
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  Induction of a protective antibody response to foot and mouth disease virus in mice following oral or parenteral immunization with alfalfa transgenic plants expressing the viral structural protein VP1.

Authors:  A Wigdorovitz; C Carrillo; M J Dus Santos; K Trono; A Peralta; M C Gómez; R D Ríos; P M Franzone; A M Sadir; J M Escribano; M V Borca
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 3.616

8.  Montanide ISA™ 201 adjuvanted FMD vaccine induces improved immune responses and protection in cattle.

Authors:  Pervaiz Dar; Ramya Kalaivanan; Nuru Sied; Bedaso Mamo; Subodh Kishore; V V S Suryanarayana; Ganesh Kondabattula
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2013-06-02       Impact factor: 3.641

9.  Intranasal immunization of guinea pigs with an immunodominant foot-and-mouth disease virus peptide conjugate induces mucosal and humoral antibodies and protection against challenge.

Authors:  D Fischer; D Rood; R W Barrette; A Zuwallack; E Kramer; F Brown; L K Silbart
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.103

10.  Comparison of antibody titres between intradermal and intramuscular rabies vaccination using inactivated vaccine in cattle in Bhutan.

Authors:  Karma Wangmo; Richard Laven; Florence Cliquet; Marine Wasniewski; Aaron Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.