Literature DB >> 32401384

Using machine learning to improve ensemble docking for drug discovery.

Tanay Chandak1, John P Mayginnes1, Howard Mayes1, Chung F Wong1.   

Abstract

Ensemble docking has provided an inexpensive method to account for receptor flexibility in molecular docking for virtual screening. Unfortunately, as there is no rigorous theory to connect the docking scores from multiple structures to measured activity, researchers have not yet come up with effective ways to use these scores to classify compounds into actives and inactives. This shortcoming has led to the decrease, rather than an increase in the performance of classifying compounds when more structures are added to the ensemble. Previously, we suggested machine learning, implemented in the form of a naïve Bayesian model could alleviate this problem. However, the naïve Bayesian model assumed that the probabilities of observing the docking scores to different structures to be independent. This approximation might prevent it from achieving even higher performance. In the work presented in this paper, we have relaxed this approximation when using several other machine learning methods-k nearest neighbor, logistic regression, support vector machine, and random forest-to improve ensemble docking. We found significant improvement.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ensemble docking; k nearest neighbor; logistic regression; machine-learning; protein kinases; random forest; support vector machine

Year:  2020        PMID: 32401384      PMCID: PMC7815257          DOI: 10.1002/prot.25899

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  31 in total

Review 1.  Flexible receptor docking for drug discovery.

Authors:  Chung F Wong
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 6.098

Review 2.  Understanding the challenges of protein flexibility in drug design.

Authors:  Dinler A Antunes; Didier Devaurs; Lydia E Kavraki
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 6.098

3.  Virtual screening workflow development guided by the "receiver operating characteristic" curve approach. Application to high-throughput docking on metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 4.

Authors:  Nicolas Triballeau; Francine Acher; Isabelle Brabet; Jean-Philippe Pin; Hugues-Olivier Bertrand
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Molecular docking to ensembles of protein structures.

Authors:  R M Knegtel; I D Kuntz; C M Oshiro
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-02-21       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Molecular docking to flexible targets.

Authors:  Jesper Sørensen; Özlem Demir; Robert V Swift; Victoria A Feher; Rommie E Amaro
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2015

6.  Exploring protein flexibility: incorporating structural ensembles from crystal structures and simulation into virtual screening protocols.

Authors:  David J Osguthorpe; Woody Sherman; Arnold T Hagler
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Recipes for the selection of experimental protein conformations for virtual screening.

Authors:  Manuel Rueda; Giovanni Bottegoni; Ruben Abagyan
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 9.  Protein flexibility in docking and surface mapping.

Authors:  Katrina W Lexa; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 5.318

10.  Directory of useful decoys, enhanced (DUD-E): better ligands and decoys for better benchmarking.

Authors:  Michael M Mysinger; Michael Carchia; John J Irwin; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 7.446

View more
  6 in total

1.  Improving Structure-Based Virtual Screening with Ensemble Docking and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Joel Ricci-Lopez; Sergio A Aguila; Michael K Gilson; Carlos A Brizuela
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 4.956

2.  Essential Dynamics Ensemble Docking for Structure-Based GPCR Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Kyle McKay; Nicholas B Hamilton; Jacob M Remington; Severin T Schneebeli; Jianing Li
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-06-29

3.  EDock-ML: A web server for using ensemble docking with machine learning to aid drug discovery.

Authors:  Tanay Chandak; Chung F Wong
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Deep Learning-Based Available and Common Clinical-Related Feature Variables Robustly Predict Survival in Community-Acquired Pneumonia.

Authors:  Ding-Yun Feng; Yong Ren; Mi Zhou; Xiao-Ling Zou; Wen-Bin Wu; Hai-Ling Yang; Yu-Qi Zhou; Tian-Tuo Zhang
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-09-04

5.  AtomNet PoseRanker: Enriching Ligand Pose Quality for Dynamic Proteins in Virtual High-Throughput Screens.

Authors:  Kate A Stafford; Brandon M Anderson; Jon Sorenson; Henry van den Bedem
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 6.  Protein-Ligand Docking in the Machine-Learning Era.

Authors:  Chao Yang; Eric Anthony Chen; Yingkai Zhang
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 4.927

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.