| Literature DB >> 32401053 |
Vijaya Knight1, Thomas Long1, Qing H Meng1, Michael A Linden1, Daniel D Rhoads1.
Abstract
CONTEXT.—: The measurement of cytokines in clinical laboratories is becoming an increasingly routine part of immune monitoring when administering biologic and cell-based immunotherapies and also for clinical assessment of inflammatory conditions. While a number of commercial assays and platforms are available for cytokine measurement, there is currently little standardization among these analytical methods. OBJECTIVE.—: To characterize the variability and comparability among cytokine testing platforms that are commonly used in clinical laboratories. DESIGN.—: We analyzed data for 4 cytokines (interleukin [IL]-1, IL-6, IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha [TNF-α]) from 6 College of American Pathologists cytokine surveys administered from 2015 to 2018. Analyses interrogated variability between testing methods and variability within each laboratory across the mailings. RESULTS.—: Significant variability was noted across methods with analysis of IL-1 showing the least variability and IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α varying between methods to a greater extent. Intralab variability was also significant with TNF-α measurements again showing the greatest variability. CONCLUSIONS.—: This retrospective analysis of College of American Pathologists proficiency testing data for cytokine measurement is the largest method comparison to date, and this study provides a description of the variation of cytokine measurement across methods, across laboratories, and within laboratories. Serial monitoring of cytokines should preferentially be performed by the same method within the same laboratory.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32401053 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2019-0519-CP
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Pathol Lab Med ISSN: 0003-9985 Impact factor: 5.534