| Literature DB >> 32399850 |
Lynne L Johnson1, Jordan Johnson2, Ziad Ali2, Yared Tekabe2, Rebecca Ober3, Gail Geist3, Alicia McLuckie3, Aram Safarov3, April Holland2, Geping Zhang3, Marina Backer4, Joseph Backer5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: New therapies to treat diabetic peripheral artery disease (PAD) require target-specific non-invasive imaging modalities to follow efficacy. As a translational study, we performed targeted imaging of receptors for vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in response to anterior femoral artery occlusion (FAO) in Yucatan minipigs and compare the normal response to response in diabetic Yucatan minipigs.Entities:
Keywords: Angiogenesis; Diabetes; Limb ischemia; VEGF; Yucatan minipigs
Year: 2020 PMID: 32399850 PMCID: PMC7218044 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-020-00626-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EJNMMI Res ISSN: 2191-219X Impact factor: 3.138
Fig. 1Coronal and transverse 3D rendering of the volumetric pig hindlimb muscles from the CT images used to identify muscle boundaries to measure 201Tl uptake for each muscle. Color code explained below images.
Fig. 2a Coronal 201Tl SPECT images of non-diabetic and diabetic pig imaged 24 h after L FAO showing reduced tracer uptake in the occluded limb (yellow arrows) compared to the non-occluded limb. The color scale bar represents counts/unit time. Mean values of ratios of total hindlimb counts for the ischemic/non-ischemic (L/R) limbs for the non-diabetic and diabetic pigs are shown on the images. b Bar graphs of mean ± SD 201Tl uptake as %IA for the three distal hindlimb muscles for day 1 and day 28 scans for non-diabetic group (left graph) and diabetic group (right graph). c Mean ± SD for the difference in 201Tl uptake (%IA) in the gastrocnemius between the 2 time points for the two groups. The difference was significant (P = 0.003). d Individual values for 201Tl uptake (%IA) at day 1 and day 28 for the gastrocnemius muscle for non-diabetic pig (blue lines) and diabetic pig (orange lines)
Fig. 3a scV/Tc SPECT/CT scans from day 7 after FAO for a non-diabetic pig on the left and a diabetic pig on the right. Yellow arrows identify the occluder on the CT scan. Red outlines show borders of the proximal gastrocnemius muscle identified on the CT. The color scale bar represents counts/unit time. The bladder was removed, and the upper threshold reduced equally in both images to about 50% of peak counts to visually bring out the muscle uptake. The raw counts derived from the images were moved to spread sheet to convert to %IA (see text). b Bar graphs of mean ± SD of ratios of tracer uptake (%IA/cc) between the two limbs taken from gastrocnemius regions. c Bar graph of ratios for %IA/g between the two limbs measured from semimembranosus biopsy specimens taken immediately prior to scans
Fig. 4Immunohistochemical staining on muscle biopsy samples taken at day 7 after FAO. Lectin stained sections below show more staining for lectin (brown chromogen) for the non-diabetic pig compared to the diabetic pig (magnification × 200). The bar graph on the right shows mean ± SD for quantification of the lectin stained capillaries for all biopsy specimens in the two groups of pigs. The non-diabetic pigs had significantly higher lectin staining. The second set of sections shows greater staining for VEGFA (brown chromogen) in the non-diabetic compared to diabetic pig
Fig. 5Top images show contrast angiograms performed at day 28 after FAO immediately prior to sacrifice showing the occluder (red arrow) and the anterior femoral artery immediately distal to the occluder (yellow arrow). The non-diabetic pig (left) shows good contrast opacification of the vessel immediately distal to the occluder while the diabetic pig (right) shows poor opacification. The green arrow identifies the profunda artery and blue arrow the circumflex branch of the anterior femoral artery that are providing more abundant collaterals in the non-diabetic pig than the diabetic pig. The bar graph below shows mean ± SD for ratios of contrast intensity between the distal anterior femoral artery and the profunda artery for the non-diabetic and diabetic pigs