Case Report: Acute hydrotherapy with super-saturated hydrogen-rich water for ankle sprain in a professional athlete.

Background: The traditional treatment of soft tissue injuries consists of the RICE protocol - rest, ice, compression, and elevation, followed for up to 72 hours after a trauma. Although designed as an immediate therapy to reduce inflammation that occurs after an acute injury, the RICE protcol might not be the best way to promote healing due to limiting blood flow. Molecular hydrogen (H 2) has recently been put forward as a possible adjuvant treatment in musculoskeletal medicine, yet limited data are available concerning its effectiveness as a first-aid intervention. Case report: We report here a case of an elite professional athlete who suffered a grade II ankle sprain, and who subsequently received six sessions of ankle and foot hydrotherapy (e.g. 30-min at every four hours) with super-saturated hydrogen-rich water during the first 24 hours post-injury. The pain VAS self-completed by the patient dropped from 50 points (moderate pain) at baseline (immediately after injury) to 20 points (mild pain) at 24-h follow-up. Ankle swelling dropped by 2.8% and dorsiflexion range of movement improved by 27.9% from baseline to follow-up, respectively. Conclusions: Our case has indicated that an acute multi-session hydrotherapy with hydrogen-rich water might be a helpful treatment in terms of pain, swelling reduction and regaining range of motion after an ankle sprain. Copyright:

Introduction

Soft tissue injuries (STIs) remain among the most prevalent traumata in musculoskeletal medicine [1]. Sprains, strains and contusions are common STIs that often occur during sport and exercise activities [2]. STIs usually require immediate treatment to reduce inflammation, bleeding and damage within the injured tissue (e.g. muscle, tendon, ligaments, joint), with management options typically comprise a break from the activity that caused an injury, and different physical therapy procedures. Applying rest, ice, compression, and elevation (RICE) therapy is referred as a long standard first-aid treatment protocol for STIs [3]. However, insufficient evidence appears to be available to determine the relative effectiveness of RICE therapy for specific STIs [4]. In particular, RICE therapy might not be the best way to promote tissue healing due to limiting blood flow, and alternative methods and techniques are advocated to help manage STIs [5]. Among others, molecular hydrogen (H 2) has recently been put forward as a possible adjuvant treatment in musculoskeletal medicine [6]. Addition of oral and topical H 2 intervention to RICE protocol was effective to reduce inflammation and augment range-of-motion recovery in athletes who suffered a soft tissue injury [7]. However, no data are available concerning the effectiveness of hydrogen when applied as an individual first-aid intervention. This case report illustrates the efficacy and safety of acute multi-session hydrotherapy with super-saturated hydrogen-rich water for ankle sprain in a professional male athlete.

Case report

Patient information

We are reporting here the case of a 29 year old male Caucasian professional football athlete who suffered a sport-related ankle sprain in April 2019. The injury occurred during a regular exercise session on artificial turf as an inversion sprain accompanied by plantar flexion. The patient was immediately evaluated by a sports medicine specialist who confirmed the category and the degree of injury (grade II ankle sprain) by physical examination. The patient was an apparently healthy young men (age 29 years, weight 77.0 kg, height 184.0 cm, professional experience 11 years), with no history of ankle sprain (or other lower extremity injuries) in the past 6 months, and no cardiometabolic or other musculoskeletal disorders. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and study protocol approved by the local IRB at the FSPE Applied Bioenergetics Lab at the University of Novi Sad (A14-2019).

Clinical findings

At the initial examination immediately after the injury, right ankle was painful, swollen and warm, and had increased laxity on testing ( Figure 1, Panel a). Self-completed visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain was 50 points (moderate pain). Figure-of-eight method of measuring ankle joint swelling at the injured ankle revealed 56.5 cm, with weight-bearing lunge test (WBLT) showing 43.1 mm. The patient demonstrated a diminished ability to bear weight.

Figure 1.

An image of sprained ankle: ( a) Immediately after the injury; ( b) At 24-h follow-up after six 30-min sessions of hydrotherapy with super-saturated hydrogen-rich water.

Hydrogen therapy

Hydrotherapy with super-saturated hydrogen-rich water was used as an exclusive treatment (besides rest) with the main aim to reduce symptoms and signs of acute ankle sprain, and it was hoped to speed up the acute recovery. Super-saturated hydrogen-rich water was produced by putting a magnesium-producing formulation (10 g) into a 3-L stationary whirlpool with tap water of neutral temperature (20°C). Hydrogen was produced by a following reaction: Mg + H 2O → H 2 + Mg(OH) 2, with concentration of hydrogen in a whirlpool ~ 8 ppm. The intervention was provided by HRW Natural Health Products Inc. (catalogue number 6-27843; New Westminster, BC, Canada). Throughout the 24 hours after the ankle sprain, the participant received six 30-min ankle baths (e.g. one hydrotherapy every 4 hours), with the first session given immediately after an initial examination (~ 60 min after the injury). During each session, the foot and ankle of injured leg were immersed in a stationary whirlpool. All hydrotherapies were formulated and supervised by a health care professional.

Follow-up and outcomes

At the 24-h follow-up examination ( Figure 1, Panel b), VAS score for pain dropped to 20 points (mild pain), with ankle circumference decreased to 54.9 cm; WBLT improved to 55.0 mm. The patient reported no side effects of hydrogen intervention (e.g. pain, cramps, tingling, discoloration of skin, burning, itching, rash), as evaluated with open-ended questionnaire administered at the end of each session of hydrotherapy, and at 24-h follow-up.

Discussion

This case report suggests the beneficial effects of hydrotherapy with hydrogen-rich water as a possible treatment to decrease pain and swelling in a professional athlete with moderate-degree ankle sprain. A number of recent animal and human studies evaluated the efficacy of H 2 in musculoskeletal medicine. H 2 appears to be effective in tackling disuse muscle atrophy in rats [8], Duchenne muscular dystrophy in mice [9], bone loss induced by modeled microgravity [10] or ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis in rats [11], and mitigate disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis [12]. For acute injuries, hydrogen-rich saline (1 ml/100 g) seems to be beneficial in attenuating muscle damage in a rat model of skeletal muscle injury induced by 3-h tourniquet occlusion and 4-h reperfusion [13]. Our group reported advantageous effects of 2-week administration of topical and oral H 2 (added to the RICE therapy) on plasma viscosity and functional recovery in a randomized controlled trial with professional athletes who suffered STIs [7]. In this case report, we found that acute hydrotherapy with super-saturated hydrogen-rich water might be beneficial when used as the exclussive first-aid treatment in specific STIs, such as ankle sprain. H 2 positively affected STI-induced signs and symptoms at 24-h follow up perhaps due to its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic effects [14]. Due to its small size and higher-grade diffusibility [6], topical hydrogen could be easily transported to hard-to-reach tissues, including areas of injury that are often characterized by low drug penetrability [15]. Specifically, H 2 might prevent (or offset) the generation of toxic compounds that occur after initial injury due to subsequent cell damage and tissue hypoxia, often referred as a secondary injury [16].

This professional athlete received a rather intensive treatment, with H 2 hydrotherapy applied in several recurrent episodes throughout the first 24 hours post-injury, a pattern that might be highly applicable to an athlete looking for an accelerated and efficacious strategy in STIs management and recovery [3]. This treatment dynamics appear to be comparable to the traditional acute RICE protocol for STIs medical care in terms of frequency (e.g. number of sessions per day) and duration of intervention (e.g. length of individual session) [4]. On the other hand, acute H 2 hydrotherapy may be superior to RICE protocol due to improved blood flow (as implied here by a decreased swelling at follow-up), while the ice component of RICE reduces blood flow to the injured area and delays healing [5]. To confirm this hypothesis, future case series should compare two interventions in a double-blind, parallel-group randomized controlled design, by evaluating peripheral circulation at the site of injury.

Due to the fact that hydrogen in water tends to evaporate over time [17], hydrogen-rich water for every session was prepared fresh and administered for 30 min. A report have shown that gaseous hydrogen remains detained in water exposed to air for up to 2 hours before its concentration drops below a therapeutical level (e.g. < 1 ppm) [18]. The super-saturated hydrogen-rich water used here (8 ppm) perhaps provides an advantage of supraphysiological dosages of H 2 administered in a time-optimized manner. However, how H 2 concentration changes during the session of hydrotherapy remains unknown. Despite that, topical H 2 hydrotherapy yielded no side effects in our patient, confirming an affirmative safety record for H 2 reported by others [for review see Ref. 16].

Several limitations must be considered when the study findings are interpreted. First, we report a relatively short period of the intervention and post-injury assessment (e.g. 24 hours) while no medium- and long-term efficacy and safety of topical hydrogen were evaluated. Second, only limited compendium of clinician- and patient-reported outcomes were analyzed, while no biomarkers of tissue injury or inflammation were employed, and a possible mechanism of hydrogen action remains unknown. Finally, it remains open to question how topical H 2 positively affects the acute recovery of other STIs with different location, etiology and severity.

Conclusions

Even though our results are based on a single-patient report, our case has indicated that an acute multi-session hydrotherapy with hydrogen-rich water might be a safe and helpful treatment in terms of pain, swelling reduction, and regaining the range of motion after an ankle sprain. We suggest a closer monitoring of the efficacy and safety of topical H 2 therapy use in different musculoskeletal injuries on a larger similar case series.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report, including any associated images.

Data availability

Underlying data

All data underlying the results are available as part of the article and no additional source data are required.

The authors of this case report argue that there is insufficient evidence on the effectiveness of RICE therapy for specific soft tissue injuries. Hence, further development of the intervention for soft tissue injuries is warranted. With that, they presented a case of a professional footballer who suffered a grade II ankle sprain and subsequently treated with six 30-minute foot immersion in hydrogen-rich water (3 L, ~8 ppm). The author concluded that the treatment might be safe and helpful in reducing pain and swelling, and regaining the range of motion after an ankle sprain.

It seems that it is the left ankle, as shown in Figure 1, but the authors reported it as right ankle sprain in the text. Further clarification is needed. The treatment was given every 4 hours throughout the 24 hours after injury, and it is reasonable to assume that the nighttime sleep would have been disrupted. Does it represent a feasible and ideal therapy for the athlete? The water temperature for the foot/ankle bath was 20°C, how does adding hydrogen-producing magnesium tablets into it help the blood flow? Further explanation of the mechanism for improved blood flow after the treatment is relevant to the understanding of hydrogen medicine in soft tissue injury.

Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?

Yes

Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for other practitioners?

Yes

Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?

Yes

Is the background of the case’s history and progression described in sufficient detail?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Exercise Physiology

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Thank you for your valuable comments and notes.

We confirmed that the right ankle was injured yet we depicted here a mirror image.

Also, the intensive hydrogen treatment might disrupt sleeping time but that's the case with all intensive measures for acute ankle injuries since the treatment requires immediate and intensive care during the firts 24 to 48 h do to specific pathophysiology.

Further studies are highly warranted to evaluate the possible effects of hydrogen on blood flow, a factor that might contribute to its mechanism(s) of action.

I thought there was good documentation of the injury including physical examination, photographs and pain scales.

The application of hydrogen water as treatment with reference to schedule and treatment application was well documented and should be repeatable.

The ankle injury was to a professional athlete. Was the athlete able to return to athletic competition as soon utilizing the hydrogen water method as would be possible using the more traditional “RICE”, approach to treatment of ankle injuries, primarily sprained ankle injury?

Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?

Yes

Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for other practitioners?

Yes

Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?

Yes

Is the background of the case’s history and progression described in sufficient detail?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Neurology

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Thank you for your comment.

We haven't been able to evaluate post-injury recovery in terms of return to athletic competition due to the nature of this study, However, this issue requires an additional trial since this aspect might be of great importance for professional athletes who usually strive for re-getting to competition as soon as possible.