Tobias Forster1,2,3, Clara Victoria Katharina Köhler1, Jürgen Debus1,2,3,4,5,6, Juliane Hörner-Rieber1,2,3,4. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. 2. Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany. 3. National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany. 4. Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. 5. Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. 6. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Breast-conserving therapy including lumpectomy and adjuvant whole breast irradiation (WBI) has become the standard therapy for early-stage breast cancer (EBC). Without WBI, the recurrence rate is significantly increased. However, when selecting patients at a low a priori risk of local recurrence only a small breast-cancer-specific mortality benefit, but no overall survival improvement, was detected for WBI. As most recurrences occur close to the lumpectomy cavity, accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) delivered exclusively to a limited volume of tissue around the initial lumpectomy site, has gained increased attention and is now discussed as an alternative to WBI for selected EBC patients. SUMMARY: Numerous techniques for APBI (interstitial brachytherapy, external beam-based APBI, intraoperative radiotherapy, MR-guided radiotherapy) allow treatment delivery in a shorter period of time, and radiation oncologists expect to further reduce side effects by using these new techniques, with improvements in cosmetics and quality of life. In this review, we aim to describe the existing evidence for the feasibility and effectiveness of different APBI techniques used in modern radiotherapy. KEY MESSAGES: APBI has provided outcomes similar to WBI combined with potentially reduced toxicity. While appropriate patient selection persists to be crucial for acceptable recurrence rates, the precise definition of patients suitable for APBI remains a matter of discussion. As long-term data are often still lacking, special attention should be paid to late side effects and long-term outcomes. Decision-making on appropriate treatment techniques should take into account not only local control rates, but also the impact on the patient's quality of life.
BACKGROUND: Breast-conserving therapy including lumpectomy and adjuvant whole breast irradiation (WBI) has become the standard therapy for early-stage breast cancer (EBC). Without WBI, the recurrence rate is significantly increased. However, when selecting patients at a low a priori risk of local recurrence only a small breast-cancer-specific mortality benefit, but no overall survival improvement, was detected for WBI. As most recurrences occur close to the lumpectomy cavity, accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) delivered exclusively to a limited volume of tissue around the initial lumpectomy site, has gained increased attention and is now discussed as an alternative to WBI for selected EBC patients. SUMMARY: Numerous techniques for APBI (interstitial brachytherapy, external beam-based APBI, intraoperative radiotherapy, MR-guided radiotherapy) allow treatment delivery in a shorter period of time, and radiation oncologists expect to further reduce side effects by using these new techniques, with improvements in cosmetics and quality of life. In this review, we aim to describe the existing evidence for the feasibility and effectiveness of different APBI techniques used in modern radiotherapy. KEY MESSAGES: APBI has provided outcomes similar to WBI combined with potentially reduced toxicity. While appropriate patient selection persists to be crucial for acceptable recurrence rates, the precise definition of patients suitable for APBI remains a matter of discussion. As long-term data are often still lacking, special attention should be paid to late side effects and long-term outcomes. Decision-making on appropriate treatment techniques should take into account not only local control rates, but also the impact on the patient's quality of life.
Authors: Pierfrancesco Franco; Giuseppe Carlo Iorio; Sara Bartoncini; Mario Airoldi; Corrado De Sanctis; Isabella Castellano; Umberto Ricardi Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2018-04-03 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: U Veronesi; E Marubini; L Mariani; V Galimberti; A Luini; P Veronesi; B Salvadori; R Zucali Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Bernard Fisher; John Bryant; James J Dignam; D Lawrence Wickerham; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Edwin R Fisher; Richard G Margolese; Lois Nesbitt; Soonmyung Paik; Thomas M Pisansky; Norman Wolmark Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-10-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Gustavo Nader Marta; Samir Abdallah Hanna; Eduardo Martella; João Luis Fernandes da Silva; Heloisa de Andrade Carvalho Journal: Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) Date: 2011 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.209
Authors: J M Kurtz; R Amalric; H Brandone; Y Ayme; J Jacquemier; J C Pietra; D Hans; J F Pollet; C Bressac; J M Spitalier Journal: Cancer Date: 1989-05-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: R W Blamey; T Bates; U Chetty; S W Duffy; I O Ellis; D George; E Mallon; M J Mitchell; I Monypenny; D A L Morgan; R D Macmillan; J Patnick; S E Pinder Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2013-03-21 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: S Corradini; F Alongi; N Andratschke; C Belka; L Boldrini; F Cellini; J Debus; M Guckenberger; J Hörner-Rieber; F J Lagerwaard; R Mazzola; M A Palacios; M E P Philippens; C P J Raaijmakers; C H J Terhaard; V Valentini; M Niyazi Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2019-06-03 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: David Krug; René Baumann; Stephanie E Combs; Marciana Nona Duma; Jürgen Dunst; Petra Feyer; Rainer Fietkau; Wulf Haase; Wolfgang Harms; Thomas Hehr; Marc D Piroth; Felix Sedlmayer; Rainer Souchon; Vratislav Strnad; Wilfried Budach Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2021-01-28 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: András Herein; Gábor Stelczer; Csilla Pesznyák; Georgina Fröhlich; Viktor Smanykó; Norbert Mészáros; Csaba Polgár; Tibor Major Journal: Radiol Oncol Date: 2021-03-25 Impact factor: 2.991
Authors: András Herein; Gábor Stelczer; Csilla Pesznyák; Georgina Fröhlich; Viktor Smanykó; Norbert Mészáros; Csaba Polgár; Zoltán Takácsi-Nagy; Tibor Major Journal: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Date: 2022-03-22